Good thing airlines can easily tanker enough gas for 1:20 each way.

I voted for this:

The Trump administration has repealed an EPA rule that classified carbon dioxide and five other greenhouse gases as a threat to public health.

The endangerment finding underpinned regulations that set emissions standards for cars and light trucks, power plants, and oil and gas industry facilies.

It is the most significant action taken yet by the Trump administration to dismantle U.S. regulations that address climate change.

And I also voted for this:

The Trump Administration is pressing ahead with its Schedule Policy/Career rule, a move that could strip civil service protections from up to 50,000 federal employees by reclassifying their jobs. The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) published the final rule in the Federal Register. It takes effect March 8. 

The rule, which was known as Schedule F in the first Trump Administration, creates a new class of federal employees known as Schedule Policy/Career. Employees in so-called “policy “positions will lose longstanding civil service protections. That means it will be easier to remove them, and more difficult to appeal adverse personnel actions. 

Over the next month, agencies will assemble a list of positions to be moved into Schedule Policy/Career. It will then go to the White House for review, with President Trump making the final call on which positions are moved into the new category. 

OPM says the change is needed to improve accountability in the federal workforce and maintain adherence to the president’s policy objectives.

“People are free to agree or disagree with any of the priorities that the president has. The only impact is if their disagreement leads them to then try to actively thwart or undermine the execution of those priorities. That behavior is not acceptable,” said OPM Director Scott Kupor at a press conference “You can’t run an organization if people are refusing to actually carry out the lawful objectives and orders of the administration.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2026/02/14/havana-syndrome-cia-norway-experiment/

BLUF: some guy in Norway did an experiment on himself to disprove Havana Syndrome and likely fried his brain in the process.

On 2/7/2026 at 9:37 AM, FourFans said:

Answers first, in my opinion: No. No. Yes. I answered Yes. Absolutely. Yes even Moreso than the president. See below. Why I served is completely irrelevant to the discussion, and would take too long to explain here.

Honor is of the utmost importance. It is the product of a lifetime of wrestling with tough decisions, making mistakes, learning from them, and actively trying to become better. It centers on TRYING to do the best and right action in every situation. Honor does not demand perfection, it demands accountability for one's actions and respect for human dignity and fallibility. One display of honor is how one treats those they don't need to treat well...such as complete strangers on the internet. That's my short answer on honor. Please feel free to define what you mean by "honor" in a positive sense, not in the negative space (negative sense such as 'honor is not what trump is')

To the implied insult to my service and sense of honor (yes, asking a service member if honor means shit to them is generally insulting, especially when you don't know them): I'm not taking your bait, but asking that question certainly speaks to your character. You've never met me. You know very little about me. I served honorably in combat. I've witnessed lives taken, and I've facilitated the taking of lives. I did my best under stressful circumstances that crushed many good men. I was not perfect. In line with this thread, I voted for Trump once. I've voted D, R, and I in local, state, and federal elections. I refuse to compromise my integrity because of someone else's lake thereof. I also feel no need for your validation nor do I owe anything to entitled critics. I would like to have an adult conversation though.

That is an example of answering questions. It's what adults should do. I'll try asking questions in line with this thread again:
What was our realistic better option than Trump in 2024 (meaning electable individual on the ballot in the last federal election)?
Who did you vote for and why?
Who do you want to see as our next president?

Good stuff. Thanks.

I'm tired of seeing people that understand honor and service dismiss the actions of Trump/admin when they see the opposite, to the point that I wonder if it matters to them anymore. Yes I know people here say Trumpis a pos, but then retort, but his policies, as if that makes it ok. Hence my questions here because I don't think its OK. If you/anyone feels offended because I had the gall to ask, it might be more about your/their words on Trump than mine.

Trump is a clown and he has amassed quite the circus. Some are trying to remain serious in their roles, like Rubio. The rest are making Jerry Springer grim with delight.

Its primary time. Please pick good people. I will try to do the same.

Happy Valentines Day, love you all.

9 hours ago, disgruntledemployee said:

Good stuff. Thanks.

I'm tired of seeing people that understand honor and service dismiss the actions of Trump/admin when they see the opposite, to the point that I wonder if it matters to them anymore. Yes I know people here say Trumpis a pos, but then retort, but his policies, as if that makes it ok. Hence my questions here because I don't think its OK. If you/anyone feels offended because I had the gall to ask, it might be more about your/their words on Trump than mine.

Trump is a clown and he has amassed quite the circus. Some are trying to remain serious in their roles, like Rubio. The rest are making Jerry Springer grim with delight.

Its primary time. Please pick good people. I will try to do the same.

Happy Valentines Day, love you all.

That was an artful dodge by not answering any questions asked of you, while poking at the answers you apparently deserve.
You appear to be one of the "take the world as I want it to be, not the way it currently is" fellas. Good to know.

Edited 18 hours ago18 hr by FourFans

10 hours ago, fire4effect said:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2026/02/14/havana-syndrome-cia-norway-experiment/

BLUF: some guy in Norway did an experiment on himself to disprove Havana Syndrome and likely fried his brain in the process.

https://www.removepaywall.com/search?url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2026/02/14/havana-syndrome-cia-norway-experiment/

22 hours ago, disgruntledemployee said:

Yes I know people here say Trumpis a pos, but then retort, but his policies, as if that makes it ok.

Because you read what you want to see, not what people actually said. Who said it's ok?

You go ahead and piss into the wind on principal, looking for honorable politicians that don't exist and probably never did. I'll vote for whatever non-hypothetical option gives my kids the best chance at living in a world where the USA is still the top dog. You want to give people a better option, great, I can't wait to see your campaign! But sitting around here claiming moral superiority, which is exactly what you're doing, because you choose to inhabit a reality that doesn't exist and can accomplish nothing is pathetic, and questioning people's honor and service is a new but unsurprising low for you.

On 2/6/2026 at 9:06 PM, disgruntledemployee said:

Does honorable service means shit to you? If so, why did you serve?

Look at the DOJ Epstien list. Anyone who was anybody or up and coming was associated with him. I don't think everyone on that list knew explicitly what he was completely up to but just like the Weinstein Hollywood shit, there was enough info out there at the time that people knew enough. Bring them all down. Not going to happen but....

Buckle up! Released all names to public, however released complete files to Congress - so, yeah we’ll see it all!

Edited 5 hours ago5 hr by bcuziknow

Look at the community notes :)

15 hours ago, FourFans said:

That was an artful dodge by not answering any questions asked of you, while poking at the answers you apparently deserve.
You appear to be one of the "take the world as I want it to be, not the way it currently is" fellas. Good to know.

Ah, I forgot about your questions. Let's see, before T2, I said on here to primary and vote for someone else.

I did vote against Hilary and later I voted against Trump with a sign in. Yeah is was meaningless. He shit the bed as T1.0, showed he wasn't just another piece of shit, but the biggest shithead ever. He broke Randy's record.

Oh next president, let's see. I'll take Mattis.

3 hours ago, Lord Ratner said:

Because you read what you want to see, not what people actually said. Who said it's ok?

You go ahead and piss into the wind on principal, looking for honorable politicians that don't exist and probably never did. I'll vote for whatever non-hypothetical option gives my kids the best chance at living in a world where the USA is still the top dog. You want to give people a better option, great, I can't wait to see your campaign! But sitting around here claiming moral superiority, which is exactly what you're doing, because you choose to inhabit a reality that doesn't exist and can accomplish nothing is pathetic, and questioning people's honor and service is a new but unsurprising low for you.

You. You are the reason people keep supporting Trump. This is exactly what I'm talking about. It's this weak, yellow, spineless bullshit in Americans and Republicans that Trump is the only one in the world that can lead this nation into peace and prosperity. And if you're depending on Trump to provide a future for your kids, you're the one pissing in the wind.