lloyd christmas Posted Friday at 02:29 PM Posted Friday at 02:29 PM These people are absolutely socialist to their core. If they didn’t throw “democratic” in front of socialist they wouldn’t have a chance of getting elected.
brabus Posted Friday at 03:50 PM Posted Friday at 03:50 PM (edited) The only applicability of “democratic” in that sense is they were all stupid enough to vote for it via a democratic process, and ironically that currently valid democratic process would soon disappear entirely if their ill-informed plan actually played out fully. Edited Friday at 03:50 PM by brabus 2
bfargin Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago I’m for anything that slows the passing of more laws (filibuster included). Slow and steady can be frustrating at times, but it’s better than thoughtless reactions. The Senate was originally supposed to be the wise and thoughtful chamber that moved slowly and purposely to prevent knee jerk reactions and minimize second and third order negative consequences. That’s def not the case now and removing the filibuster will make it even worse. 1
HeloDude Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago Every now then (though it seems to happen more often over the last several years), the left says the quiet part out loud.
bfargin Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago I’m in shock that beached whales care about their eyebrows. Shouldn’t they be working on heart healthy diets and not worrying about lipstick on a sow.
disgruntledemployee Posted 3 hours ago Author Posted 3 hours ago Well, I guess if you have to spend your cash on food vs spa treatments, sure.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now