Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
I'm only familiar with what Orbitz did, which was *showing* more expensive things to Mac users, not charging more for the same thing.
 
https://millionmilesecrets.com/guides/are-airlines-raising-your-ticket-price-based-on-browser-history/amp/
 
That's a significant difference.

I’ve used a VPN in the past for one Caribbean resort chain, they would offer lower prices if you change your location to outside the US.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Upvote 1
Posted
52 minutes ago, Guardian said:


Unfamiliar. What’s that?

In the top right of your browser, just hit incognito mode. It prevents your computer from story cookies and other files that mine data off your browser and send it back to the merchant site. 

More importantly, also prevents your wife from finding out you were surfing porn because you forgot to clear your history.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 2
Posted (edited)

Shit gets real at the VFW!

It you dont like the song....just tell us.  

Edited by Biff_T
Afterthought
Posted (edited)

The non radical democrats vote against women’s sports.

 

 

IMG_3067.jpeg

Edited by bfargin
  • Sad 1
Posted
7 hours ago, bfargin said:

The non radical democrats vote against women’s sports.

 

 

IMG_3067.jpeg

The left can’t even define what a woman is, so how can they be expected to vote in favor of protecting women’s sports.  What the House should really do is put a bill ending Title IX and see how the left votes…they won’t know what to do at that point.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 2
Posted (edited)
On 4/23/2023 at 6:57 AM, HeloDude said:

The left can’t even define what a woman is, so how can they be expected to vote in favor of protecting women’s sports.  What the House should really do is put a bill ending Title IX and see how the left votes…they won’t know what to do at that point.

Guys I figured it out, if every dude on earth identifies as a woman maybe we can get the left to quit bitching about the gender pay gap

 

but seriously the lefts gender philosophy is so full of contradictions and I feel like the right does a very poor job pointing them out. 
 

If women are a victim class that need protecting, it must have some definition.. except the left balks when you ask for one. 
 

If gender is a social construct and completely fluid, why do people need to get surgeries to align with something (apparently) totally made up.

 

Edited by Pooter
  • Upvote 5
Posted (edited)

Screenshot_20230501_131712_Chrome(1).thumb.jpg.d554b7b29f40aab34b301d0d77e0594f.jpg

Getting a ride to the beach...lol

This image is awesome!!!

Here's the link to the article.  Not as interesting as the photo. 

https://www.militarytimes.com/off-duty/military-culture/2023/05/01/kansas-man-upset-he-cant-buy-mini-toyotas-like-the-taliban-and-isis/

 

Edit:  this was not me.

Edited by Biff_T
Guest nsplayr
Posted

 

Posted
17 minutes ago, nsplayr said:

 

Ever since I saw the Hilux episodes on Top Gear in the 2000's, they have been high on my dream car list. 

  • Upvote 1
Posted

Come on you right wing conspiracy nuts the trannies and bone-smugglers aren’t grooming/targeting your kids. 
 

 

 

  • Upvote 1
Posted

Scientific American (allegedly a science focused magazine) goes full retard with some moronic professor at Princeton claiming to disprove the human gender binary. Even advanced degrees can’t save someone from being a complete dumbass. Basically lots of word salad nonsense that ends with … humans have dif. interests and personalities. No shit Sherlock, now outline details on the third sex you discovered!

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/heres-why-human-sex-is-not-binary/?amp=true

Posted
21 hours ago, bfargin said:

Scientific American (allegedly a science focused magazine) goes full retard with some moronic professor at Princeton claiming to disprove the human gender binary. Even advanced degrees can’t save someone from being a complete dumbass. Basically lots of word salad nonsense that ends with … humans have dif. interests and personalities. No shit Sherlock, now outline details on the third sex you discovered!

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/heres-why-human-sex-is-not-binary/?amp=true

It's wild that, in trying to embrace gender diversity, the left is actually pushing all the gender stereotypes that past generations of feminists tried to get rid of.

  • Like 3
Posted (edited)

The progressive arm of the Dem party are the most regressive group in our history. I can’t think of another time we actually went drastically backwards in American society. By the way, dems are calling for segregated classrooms, etc. in 2023…they’ve literally regressed past 60 years of societal advancement. 

Edited by brabus
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 2
Posted
10 hours ago, uhhello said:

"Houseless" man who has been arrested more than 40 times for assault and the like was choked out on subway while harassing riders and ultimately ended up dying.  Twitter is full of subway riders commenting on how he has attacked them in the past.  AOC takes this chance to defend the man and.....

https://twitter.com/AOC/status/1653880169516466178?s=20

A chokehold is never a good idea, and while the Marine who did so won't be charged, there was no reason in this instance to use it. 

The guy was yelling at passengers and throwing trash, but that still doesn't justify using what the DOJ has determined to be a potentially lethal tactic... 

As for AOC, she's just being her usual ass hat self...

  • Downvote 1
Posted (edited)
41 minutes ago, M2 said:

A chokehold is never a good idea, and while the Marine who did so won't be charged, there was no reason in this instance to use it. 

The guy was yelling at passengers and throwing trash, but that still doesn't justify using what the DOJ has determined to be a potentially lethal tactic... 

As for AOC, she's just being her usual ass hat self...

There's a lot more going on here than the news story covers. At the base of which is that these urban police departments refuse to patrol their metro systems. 6 months ago we are berating passengers for standing by doing nothing while a woman is assaulted (and another one raped in Philadelphia) but now we want to denigrate someone who did do something in the only way he knew how. If there's any anger over this situation is misplaced at the bystander and needs to be directed at the city that is turning the daily commute for 90% of it's residence into a Purge movie. 

 

If you haven't seen this video before, its going to trigger anger. The genuine fear in this poor woman's eyes...

https://youtu.be/44-IpvZRfAw

Edited by FLEA
  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1
Posted
1 hour ago, M2 said:

and while the Marine who did so won't be charged, there was no reason in this instance to use it. 
 

Ballsy call

Posted
3 hours ago, M2 said:

A chokehold is never a good idea, and while the Marine who did so won't be charged, there was no reason in this instance to use it. 

The guy was yelling at passengers and throwing trash, but that still doesn't justify using what the DOJ has determined to be a potentially lethal tactic... 

As for AOC, she's just being her usual ass hat self...

Don't act hostile towards others and you won't have appropriate actions taken against you. People need to remember that actions have consequences. Not glad that homeless criminal died, but if he wasn't acting that way it wouldn't have happened. 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Posted
56 minutes ago, VMFA187 said:

Don't act hostile towards others and you won't have appropriate actions taken against you. People need to remember that actions have consequences. Not glad that homeless criminal died, but if he wasn't acting that way it wouldn't have happened. 

So had the Marine been armed, it would have been OK/legal to shoot the guy?

It's the reasonable use of force continuum, you don't immediately go to lethal/deadly force unless there is an imminent threat to life, which typically requires some type of weapon but could also include motor vehicles

The guy was an active aggressor, and had mental health issues; but he was also unarmed.

The intent is de-escalation, and a chokehold under these circumstances does not equate to a "reasonableness standard."

Posted
4 hours ago, FLEA said:

There's a lot more going on here than the news story covers. At the base of which is that these urban police departments refuse to patrol their metro systems. 6 months ago we are berating passengers for standing by doing nothing while a woman is assaulted (and another one raped in Philadelphia) but now we want to denigrate someone who did do something in the only way he knew how. If there's any anger over this situation is misplaced at the bystander and needs to be directed at the city that is turning the daily commute for 90% of it's residence into a Purge movie.

If you haven't seen this video before, its going to trigger anger. The genuine fear in this poor woman's eyes...

https://youtu.be/44-IpvZRfAw

I hear you and agree the cities are at fault for not protecting riders on the subway, but that still doesn't justify the use of a tactic known to greatly increase the chance of death to subdue an unarmed individual.   

Remember "proportionality?!?"  

Posted
1 hour ago, M2 said:

I hear you and agree the cities are at fault for not protecting riders on the subway, but that still doesn't justify the use of a tactic known to greatly increase the chance of death to subdue an unarmed individual.   

Remember "proportionality?!?"  

Absolutely! Definitely put the chief of police and mayor on trial for murder and for abdicating their duties to protect citizens! 100% agree with you. 

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...