June 28, 201213 yr but I don't think they forget the guns. No, but they did forget to tell the SSgt (me) who was crating their stuff through Greek security. That made for an interesting day.
June 29, 201213 yr where the F was this chick when i was 15?!?! (of course, er, i've never been in a tanning salon) https://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/06/26/oklahoma-woman-charged-with-lewd-acts-with-minor-in-tanning-booth/?intcmp=obinsite
June 29, 201213 yr where the F was this chick when i was 15?!?! (of course, er, i've never been in a tanning salon) https://www.foxnews.c...intcmp=obinsite Her Facebook - she's quite cute when not bawling her eyes out. Edited June 29, 201213 yr by Vertigo
June 29, 201213 yr where the F was this chick when i was 15?!?! (of course, er, i've never been in a tanning salon) https://www.foxnews.c...intcmp=obinsite I think we have a winner for worst Mom ever.
July 1, 201213 yr I think we have a winner for worst Mom ever. I would have to rank her second to the mom of the kid that Debra LaFave was doing. I would never forgive my mom for messing that up. Edited July 1, 201213 yr by HerkFE
July 3, 201213 yr This is quite possibly the worst thing I've ever read https://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2012/07/accused_wendys_attacker_adam_l.html
July 3, 201213 yr Too bad the father didn't save the state from a trial and cost of housing this douche-bag homo.
July 3, 201213 yr Too bad the father didn't save the state from a trial and cost of housing this douche-bag homo. That's what a father here did--with his bare hands--after catching some piece of shit molesting his 4-yr-old daughter. And the grand jury refused to indict him! Another great reason to live in Texas!
July 4, 201213 yr This is quite possibly the worst thing I've ever read https://www.oregonliv...ker_adam_l.html Mark my words...some lawyer will have a HEYDAY with this one.
July 4, 201213 yr Too bad the father didn't save the state from a trial and cost of housing this douche-bag homo. That was my kid? It wouldn't have been folks holding the door shut to keep the bastard in the restroom, it woulda been the crowd barring the door to keep me from beating the sumbich to death with his own arms. And had it been in Texas, by the time the cops got there the whole crowd would've stomped him to pulp--and no one woulda seen a thing.
July 4, 201213 yr NOAA was gracious enough to issue a statement claiming that mermaids don't exist; it was a nice follow up to the CDC telling us that we don't have to worry about zombies. https://news.yahoo.com/blogs/sideshow/noaa-issues-statement-denying-existence-mermaids-195027537.html
July 4, 201213 yr NOAA was gracious enough to issue a statement claiming that mermaids don't exist; it was a nice follow up to the CDC telling us that we don't have to worry about zombies. https://news.yahoo.co...-195027537.html However, in Louisiana you do need to look out for the Loch Ness monster.
July 4, 201213 yr "Hey, you did an awesome job on that last award package...we think you should write yourself up for an award for how good you are at writing awards!" (See: Gill Robb Wilson Award ) Mind=blown (P.S. No disrespect to a guy who flew in WW I...for the French...wait, wut?)
July 4, 201213 yr However, in Louisiana you do need to look out for the Loch Ness monster. Looks liks Karl Rove was hired as chief of PR for ACE, NOAA, and the CDC.
July 4, 201213 yr https://www.reuters.com/article/2012/06/28/us-germany-circumcision-idUSBRE85R1F020120628 I'll count drooling as a waiver of rights.
July 4, 201213 yr https://www.reuters.c...E85R1F020120628 I'll count drooling as a waiver of rights. It's a snap. I take my little machine, I take your little thing. See? I put it into this little hole here, and nip the tip.
July 5, 201213 yr https://www.reuters.c...E85R1F020120628 I'll count drooling as a waiver of rights. I was thrilled to see this ruling. Anytime the state overturns a purely religious reason for doing something, especially what amounts to minor surgery, I'm all for it.
July 5, 201213 yr I was thrilled to see this ruling. Anytime the state overturns a purely religious reason for doing something, especially what amounts to minor surgery, I'm all for it. Is my sarcasm detector INOP or are you serious?
July 5, 201213 yr I was thrilled to see this ruling. Anytime the state overturns a purely religious reason for doing something, especially what amounts to minor surgery, I'm all for it. Seriously, so reduced risk of: urinary tract infections, certain STD's, and Penile Cancer are purely religious reasons? Not to mention the fact that doctors say that if it is going to be done, the earlier the better. Plus roughly 2/3 of american males are circumcised and yet the there is no evidence of it causing any problems (emotional or physical) except when done improperly (which is medical malpractice more than anything). Are you going to tell me that you think that 2/3 of american males are either Jewish or Muslim? Because saying this is purely a religious practice implies exactly that! Add to this, the fact that it is an important religious ceremony in some major religions that causes no harm and some medical benefits. I have to side with the Jews and Muslims on this one, not to mention multiple christian groups in the area who are against this ruling and the christians don't even believe it to be a religious necessity. this is a blatant stomp on religious freedom.
July 5, 201213 yr Seriously, so reduced risk of: urinary tract infections, certain STD's, and Penile Cancer... That's opinion, not fact: https://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/DOC/statement03.html
July 5, 201213 yr Cops raid a marijuana dispensary that's legally allowed to operate, per the state. Officers smash the shop's security camera, ostensibly to hide evidence of the event. https://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/Long-Beach-Police-Pot-Marijuana-Shop-Raid-Arrests-Excessive-Force-Investigation-161366395.html
July 6, 201213 yr https://www.reuters.c...E85R1F020120628 I'll count drooling as a waiver of rights. Every generation of ze Germans just has to find a way to fuck with the Jews, eh?
July 6, 201213 yr Seriously, so reduced risk of: urinary tract infections, certain STD's, and Penile Cancer are purely religious reasons? Not to mention the fact that doctors say that if it is going to be done, the earlier the better. Plus roughly 2/3 of american males are circumcised and yet the there is no evidence of it causing any problems (emotional or physical) except when done improperly (which is medical malpractice more than anything). Are you going to tell me that you think that 2/3 of american males are either Jewish or Muslim? Because saying this is purely a religious practice implies exactly that! Add to this, the fact that it is an important religious ceremony in some major religions that causes no harm and some medical benefits. I have to side with the Jews and Muslims on this one, not to mention multiple christian groups in the area who are against this ruling and the christians don't even believe it to be a religious necessity. this is a blatant stomp on religious freedom. Great. Then get it done for medical reasons, not religious ones. Hell, if the benefits are so great, let's mandate circumcision along with MMR shots. I don't agree at all that we should be cutting into infants' bodies to satisfy some mythological command from several thousand years ago. I'm really pretty happy with the decision for a few reasons, not the least of which is that it slams the door firmly shut on female circumcision, still practiced by many sects of the Muslim community. No part of this ruling said that infants can't be circumcised, or that a rabbi/mullah can't be present. It said it will only be done for medical reasons. Since you listed a whole bunch of medical reasons, I would guess there are probably a bunch of doctors willing to sign the "medical necessity" paperwork. Is my sarcasm detector INOP or are you serious? 100% serious. I love any ruling that takes rights away from various religious groups. Mostly because those religious groups are usually busy trying to take rights from other people.
July 6, 201213 yr https://www.duffelblog.com/2012/07/new-dod-policy-to-assign-rank-to-military-spouses/ The DoD considers assigning ranks to spouses in order to mediate conflict. (yes, it's a joke).
July 6, 201213 yr https://www.duffelblo...litary-spouses/ The DoD considers assigning ranks to spouses in order to mediate conflict. (yes, it's a joke). That site has potential! Tired Of ‘Chair Force’ Nickname, Colonel Bans Chairs
Create an account or sign in to comment