But you're not selling your excess power back to the man then. Which is fine but not possible as far as I know if you aren't storing but returning your excess. It would be tough to find a contractor that would be willing to install a solar setup and not follow the local code/rules.
Right, so I'm not seeing how the utility would regulate non-battery bank homes to prevent feeding back into the grid. I'm sure its possible but we've lived here for 5 years now and have had zero outages so not a big deal to me.
Your system feeds back into the system even during an outage? I mean I kind of see their point. If power is being fed back into a line that they think is isolated, they would have to determine which houses are still powered and manually disocnnect them in order to service the line.
From their site:
If a power outage occurs, your PV system is required to shut down automatically for safety reasons. This prevents excess energy generated by your system from flowing back to our circuits while our crews are repairing equipment, which must be de-energized to prevent an electrical hazard.
You can go completely solar but they won't connect you back to their grid if you have panels on your roof and don't comply with their requirements. They say its a safety thing for them.
That's a bingo. You also have to be willing to game the system. Can't tell you how many times it was suggested to me by guys I had respected my whole career to "just submit for x,y,z, they can't prove you don't have it"
Rest easy. The best and brightest that helped plan and execute the flawless withdrawal from AFG are being hand picked for the task force assembled to game plan future Russia.
Debt is debt right? Whether its going to defeat one of our long time "enemies" or its going to do a study on the long term harm to the mosquito population in Dubuque county California, it's still debt. It's not like adding to the debt is anything new for eiher side when they are in charge.
FAA confirmed 1000' separation at stop. Sounds like the ground radar saved the day. Next step for greater safety has to be some sort of automated communication to the aircraft in conflict versus an alert that relies on a human to hear/see the alert, then identify the conflict, then communicate to the conflicted aircraft?
Thats what I'm wondering. He wants to run and "they" don't want him to. Do they tear him down this way though? Seems there are easier less messy for everyone ways.