BFM this

I thought that we were talking about tomorrow's fight, not yesterday's. But sure, I'm game. Have you been on the ground and supported by the range of platforms you discuss? Otherwise it sounds like a talking point. The Laser RX were tested on the A-10 years ago. I thought it was a fantastic idea, but I was not a decision maker at that level, and bigger brains passed on the idea. Meh... Other than that, having employed three out of the four fielded weapons that you describe, I'm not sure where you're getting your CDE data, unless the brochure says Raytheon on the front. Real simple: Army is EVENT driven. Air Force is TIME driven. That's one of the enduring puzzles of CAS. Right capability at the right time. Not gonna change. Sorry man, it's still not flying artillery, and the F-35 won't be, either. Yes, you can bridge the gap some with a long loiter platform like the Reaper, but that ignores the current debate: survivability, which the Reaper is much more vulnerable, hands down. So that leaves your final point, wear and tear. Once the ground CC departs, the AF is going to do it's level best to have assets in place at the right TIME to catch the Army's EVENTS. If you think it's expensive to have A-10's loitering overhead, wait till you get the bill for a stack of F-35's. Just to be clear, I think any rational A-10 advocate would say that we need the F-22 and F-35, and whatever is next down the pike. I hate it when the debate takes an "us vs. them" detour, because it distracts from the honest truths. Unfortunately, if you're counting on those airframes to provide quality integrated CLOSE Air Support, I think we're going to relearn some past lessons. The same lessons that gave us what are, in essence, upgraded capabilities from the A-1D. The only replacement should be upgraded capabilities from the A-10, not substitute pinch hitters from other communities, delivering watered down metric based sham results. This guy is doing a better job of framing the debate than I can. And he's Army. (Wait...I'm Air Force...that means...)

Against a peer adversary, the A-10 stopped being a Day-1 weapon around the time that it was rolling off of the assembly line. We were simply going to accept higher attrition in the Fulda Gap as part of the plan. By the 90's, the Hawg wasn't even a Week-1 weapon. Going into 2020, the Hawg simply won't be in the fight until ground troops cross the line. But there's the rub--we don't roll ground troops under contested airspace. So yes, the A-10 will sit in the chocks until the air is permissible--and it's going to continue to need cover while it does it's job. But the capabilities simply do not translate to those platforms which are being counted on to bring down the air threat, and provide cover moving forward. The F-35 simply won't do under the weather, low vis, escort, rescort, knife-fight close proximity...and the list goes on. To be blunt, the A-10 and it's core TTPs just aren't that far removed from an A-1D over VN. But then again, linear battlefield infantry tactics (at least looking down from the air) haven't either. Leaders have become accustomed to pred feeds and the whispers of the military industrial complex saying "but with this new technology just around the corner, EVERYTHING will be different". My bet is that even in a German Formula 1 team garage, amongst the computers and precision calipers and multimeters, there's still a claw hammer in a drawer somewhere.

fwiw, the last guy I knew that left the jet non-experienced, is back in the jet. 11F's are the flavor of the month, in case you hadn't heard. For that matter, I'm at PIT and I can count the number of 11F's going through training right now on one hand, so...

What Air Force are you living in? This is our exact vision going forward, up to and including service chief/secretary testimony to congress. Get on board.

That's like asking why folks watch Nascar...

Manchester... But hey, keep up the good fight!

Happens every year. My YG was 113 pin-on's per month until Nov, then everyone cashed out between Nov and Dec.

Uhhhm, no. No you would not. We proved that during the last CSAF era (double down SEPTS in the sim for all my friends on Mondays! I agree with you in principle, but in practice...at least pretend to be intellectually honest. That's the root of the problem. Whether it's patches or hats or ABUs or bags, we're bitching about some really trivial shit. (Have to implicate myself, I bitched about and/or notched blues mondays with the rest).

Shared custody, or single-man rules? Age? Toddler, elementary, or is she somewhat self-sufficient? I was in a shared custody arrangement (though I was primary) while there. The toughest part was Mids, although if she is school age, this is much less of a problem--I slept while my kids were at school, thereby staying on schedule over my weekends. Toughest part about it was not being able to shut your phone off in case the school calls.

Somewhere at A1, there is a slide that challenges this convention.

FFS, it's not that tough. Don't be a DB. If you graduated college, then be sober when you show up in the morning, and you'll do fine.

Did we just get spammed?

No, but I'd be glad to pass it along 8am: Start a rumor 10am: if you haven't heard your rumor yet, start another...

Dammit, Siri!!!

You may at some point come to understand that the report was crafted, by design, to upset you. It was released specifically to elicit an emotional response, decoupled from reason and informed thinking. And taken at face value with no counterpoint, it is natural for you to be upset. Despite the fact that I do not agree with all of the methods, I am not upset, but then I have the luxury of not being under the same illusions. Call back after MQT. You were the target audience of this report.

Park it on the lemon lot for 20% over market value. Should still be there in 4-5 months...

Name one adversary that has treated a captured U.S. citizen even semi-humanely when captured. Ever. The best that you'll find is probably the germans in WWII, and that was no Club Med.

365's aren't part of the force management initiative. 365's are the lead force management initiative. https://www.youtube.com/embed/wMEq1mGpP5A?autoplay=1

He heard that Delta is supposed to hire 1500 next year.

Most safety investigations that I've seen have done a decent job of sorting out the CFs, Fs, and NFWODs. For the most part, this thread is drivel, imo. FWIW, I'm probably biased, having a degree in HF. Actually, I took a few classes with Doc Weigmann at Illinois; great prof, and I don't remember him coming off as peddling tripe to further a rabbit trail agenda. If anything these days, its this, to some degree:

. Wonder if Scooter IPs felt that way.

That's fine except Lt's aren't real people.

"The CDC's decision to play up flu deaths dates back a decade, when it realized the public wasn't following its advice on the flu vaccine. During the 2003 flu season "the manufacturers were telling us that they weren't receiving a lot of orders for vaccine,"Dr. Glen Nowak, associate director for communications at CDC's National Immunization Program, told National Public Radio. "It really did look like we needed to do something to encourage people to get a flu shot." Posted from the NEW Baseops.net App!