TreeA10 Posted March 20 Share Posted March 20 I'm trying to figure out how a woman in Minnesota(?) was convicted of manslaughter because she didn't understand the mental problems of her son but was not a psychologist, but a woman can be put on the the SCOTUS that can't define a woman because she is not a biologist but that is okay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Biff_T Posted March 22 Share Posted March 22 https://ktla.com/news/local-news/mcdonalds-franchisee-you-cant-raise-prices-enough-to-cover-minimum-wage-hike/ Let's not think about the consequences of raising the minimum wage for fast food workers in CA, let's just do it. This CA bill is what you can expect from CA Democrats. This is not going to help the fast food workers when they don't have jobs anymore. Just send them all to "Skid Row". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Ratner Posted March 22 Share Posted March 22 4 hours ago, Biff_T said: https://ktla.com/news/local-news/mcdonalds-franchisee-you-cant-raise-prices-enough-to-cover-minimum-wage-hike/ Let's not think about the consequences of raising the minimum wage for fast food workers in CA, let's just do it. This CA bill is what you can expect from CA Democrats. This is not going to help the fast food workers when they don't have jobs anymore. Just send them all to "Skid Row". I was living in England when all the liberals in America were talking about a $15 minimum wage for fast food workers. I remember saying then that they were just going to cost a bunch of people their jobs, because at the time Europe had the self-ordering kiosks that had not yet made their way to America. Now you see those in damn near every store. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaputt Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 It all makes sense though when you realize it’s all just to bribe people to vote for you. A bunch of these lefties probably know it will kill jobs, so they get a 2 for 1 bribe. Tell the poor people they’re going to make $25 an hour, you get their votes. Natural economics takes over and said employees now lose their jobs and need govt suppprt; perfect opportunity to bribe for further votes with more govt handouts. 2 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeloDude Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 I’ve been thinking about this more lately: So with the increased rhetoric from the left on how Trump is a Nazi, he’ll be a dictator if he wins, our democracy will be over, he’ll take all of our rights away, etc…if one is truly to believe that they actually think this way, then why should one also not believe that the left will do almost anything, including using illegal means, to keep Trump out of the WH? I mean, our founding fathers started a war over much less fear, so why would one be surprised if the leftists use illegal means to effect the results? Will leftists in government work with big tech to hurt Trump’s chances (just one example)?—they already did this in 2020 by the way. Additionally, the left is freaking out about any other independent/3rd party candidate on the ballot potentially taking away votes from Biden. They’re saying the candidates are putting democracy at risk (the irony)…eventually we have to ask ourselves what is the limit they will go to keep Trump from potentially wining, because I don’t think it’s entirely all just political rhetoric. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Ratner Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 1 hour ago, HeloDude said: I’ve been thinking about this more lately: So with the increased rhetoric from the left on how Trump is a Nazi, he’ll be a dictator if he wins, our democracy will be over, he’ll take all of our rights away, etc…if one is truly to believe that they actually think this way, then why should one also not believe that the left will do almost anything, including using illegal means, to keep Trump out of the WH? I mean, our founding fathers started a war over much less fear, so why would one be surprised if the leftists use illegal means to effect the results? Will leftists in government work with big tech to hurt Trump’s chances (just one example)?—they already did this in 2020 by the way. Additionally, the left is freaking out about any other independent/3rd party candidate on the ballot potentially taking away votes from Biden. They’re saying the candidates are putting democracy at risk (the irony)…eventually we have to ask ourselves what is the limit they will go to keep Trump from potentially wining, because I don’t think it’s entirely all just political rhetoric. If they really believed it there would be martyrs. There aren't. It's just team sports. That means yes, they will cheat and lie and steal (just like in team sports), but until they are shedding blood all the talk of an existential risk to democracy is just political cheerleading. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeloDude Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 34 minutes ago, Lord Ratner said: That means yes, they will cheat and lie and steal This is my point though…the cheating and lying. What kind of country are we living in? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uhhello Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 (edited) 12 minutes ago, HeloDude said: This is my point though…the cheating and lying. What kind of country are we living in? The same one since it's existence began. Edited March 27 by uhhello Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeloDude Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 15 minutes ago, uhhello said: The same one since it's existence began. Not sure if I follow your post—are you saying there’s always been lying and cheating (on a scale that can change the outcome of a national election) since the country’s existence began? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uhhello Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 (edited) 7 minutes ago, HeloDude said: Not sure if I follow your post—are you saying there’s always been lying and cheating (on a scale that can change the outcome of a national election) since the country’s existence began? You don't think there has? Edit: I disagree with the level of changing an outcome though. Edited March 27 by uhhello Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeloDude Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 17 minutes ago, uhhello said: You don't think there has? Edit: I disagree with the level of changing an outcome though. I’m not a historian, so I don’t know the finer details when it comes to 200+ years of our national elections, but I would agree that there is always some level of voter fraud, that by definition I suppose qualifies as cheating. But I’m referring to something of the scale of 2020 when those in the federal government outright worked directly with big tech/the media to silence the legitimately of the Hunter laptop story in order to help Biden. I think this definitely could have effected the election results on a national scale. https://nypost.com/2022/08/26/2020-election-outcome-would-differ-with-hunter-biden-laptop-coverage-poll/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uhhello Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 27 minutes ago, HeloDude said: I’m not a historian, so I don’t know the finer details when it comes to 200+ years of our national elections, but I would agree that there is always some level of voter fraud, that by definition I suppose qualifies as cheating. But I’m referring to something of the scale of 2020 when those in the federal government outright worked directly with big tech/the media to silence the legitimately of the Hunter laptop story in order to help Biden. I think this definitely could have effected the election results on a national scale. https://nypost.com/2022/08/26/2020-election-outcome-would-differ-with-hunter-biden-laptop-coverage-poll/ I assumed you were referencing actual vote manipulation. I withdraw my objection your honor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brabus Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 Was the 2020 election “stolen?” No, I don’t think so as there is no evidence of large scale, impactful voter fraud. But was it substantially skewed towards one candidate through a concerted effort at the fed and state level in collusion with media companies and big tech, fuck yeah it was. And that to me is just as big of a problem as “direct” voter fraud. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeloDude Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 31 minutes ago, uhhello said: I assumed you were referencing actual vote manipulation. I withdraw my objection your honor. If election officials in X state or Y county truly believe that our democracy is over if Trump gets elected, that he’ll be a dictator, our right will end, blah blah blah…why wouldn’t they manipulate the vote if they can? If you truly believed you were going to be living under a gestapo style police state, wouldn’t you do something in order to try and stop it? Manipulating the vote if you’re able to do so is a lot easier/less dangerous than an armed rebellion. What I’m saying is we have to start listening to what these government officials are saying and not just assume it’s 100% political rhetoric. Arresting people for being on beaches during Covid wasn’t political rhetoric…it actually happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brabus Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 Make mail-in voting illegal in all 50 states and require state-issued ID to vote. That should have happened yesterday and would solve the issue helodude is talking about. However, still doesn’t address the IO campaign the DNC and media/tech are leveraging. Admittedly the RNC would do the same thing if they weren’t so inept and fragmented (and actually had media/tech on their side), so this isn’t a partisan statement, it’s just stating the current situation. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Biff_T Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 40 minutes ago, HeloDude said: If you truly believed you were going to be living under a gestapo style police state, wouldn’t you do something in order to try and stop it? They (the crazy dems) are all talk. The moment they see their homies getting the shit beat out of them, they stop talking. They bitch for the sport of bitching. Nothing will ever be good enough and there always be something to feel upset about. Whiny little bitches. The kind that I'd bitch slap in a heartbeat. I see plenty of them where I live. Pasty trolls that have no financial independence. Most of them live with their parents. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeloDude Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 (edited) 59 minutes ago, Biff_T said: They (the crazy dems) are all talk. The moment they see their homies getting the shit beat out of them, they stop talking. They bitch for the sport of bitching. Nothing will ever be good enough and there always be something to feel upset about. Whiny little bitches. The kind that I'd bitch slap in a heartbeat. I see plenty of them where I live. Pasty trolls that have no financial independence. Most of them live with their parents. But they’re not all talk…look at what they did in 2020. They believe the ends justify the means. And I would argue that current Trump is in a stronger position today compared to 2020 (especially considering how Biden has done over the last 3 years)…so it begs the question of what the left is willing to do this year? Edited March 27 by HeloDude Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Biff_T Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 2 hours ago, HeloDude said: so it begs the question of what the left is willing to do this year? Panic over RFK Jr. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Ratner Posted March 28 Share Posted March 28 7 hours ago, uhhello said: The same one since it's existence began. Not really. But one that has existed over and over and over throughout history. We are in the unpleasant phase of the cycle. In another lifetime whatever societies emerge from this conflict will find themselves in another. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smokin Posted March 28 Share Posted March 28 5 hours ago, HeloDude said: If election officials in X state or Y county truly believe that our democracy is over if Trump gets elected, that he’ll be a dictator, our right will end, blah blah blah…why wouldn’t they manipulate the vote if they can? If you truly believed you were going to be living under a gestapo style police state, wouldn’t you do something in order to try and stop it? Manipulating the vote if you’re able to do so is a lot easier/less dangerous than an armed rebellion. What I’m saying is we have to start listening to what these government officials are saying and not just assume it’s 100% political rhetoric. Arresting people for being on beaches during Covid wasn’t political rhetoric…it actually happened. Problem is: 1. Being able to tell the difference between the obvious need for politicians to play to their bases (thus saying things they have no intention of doing) 2. Understanding that even if the people at the top don't actually believe it, the middle and lower levels of government may actually enact what the top is saying 3. People tend to ignore what other people say about themselves and their intentions (just look at some of the left's defense of Hamas, an organization that would use a dull knife to cut the head off 95% of Americans if they could and then brag about it to their mom) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClearedHot Posted March 31 Share Posted March 31 Wonderful job by Biden trying to take Easter away from all the Christians and rebrand it Transgender Awareness Day of Visibility. It is a free country, dress how you want, date who you want, be what you want but to purposely hijack a religious holiday with great meaning to many Christians is a direct assault on people of faith by demented Left Wing extremists. As if to pour a little salt in the wound, the White House has banned Religious-themed designs from the White House Easter egg art contest tomorrow. Trump selling bibles is stupid, the liberal hate of faith is sickening. 7 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaputt Posted March 31 Share Posted March 31 4 minutes ago, ClearedHot said: Wonderful job by Biden trying to take Easter away from all the Christians and rebrand it Transgender Awareness Day of Visibility. It is a free country, dress how you want, date who you want, be what you want but to purposely hijack a religious holiday with great meaning to many Christians is a direct assault on people of faith by demented Left Wing extremists. As if to pour a little salt in the wound, the White House has banned Religious-themed designs from the White House Easter egg art contest tomorrow. Trump selling bibles is stupid, the liberal hate of faith is sickening. Imagine if they had chosen a Muslim holiday for Transgender Awareness Day 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
herkbum Posted March 31 Share Posted March 31 Imagine if they had chosen a Muslim holiday for Transgender Awareness DayThe puppet master Obama would never approve of thatSent from my iPhone using Baseops Network mobile app 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dream big Posted March 31 Share Posted March 31 2 hours ago, ClearedHot said: Wonderful job by Biden trying to take Easter away from all the Christians and rebrand it Transgender Awareness Day of Visibility. It is a free country, dress how you want, date who you want, be what you want but to purposely hijack a religious holiday with great meaning to many Christians is a direct assault on people of faith by demented Left Wing extremists. As if to pour a little salt in the wound, the White House has banned Religious-themed designs from the White House Easter egg art contest tomorrow. Trump selling bibles is stupid, the liberal hate of faith is sickening. I think someone on his PR team was cleared hot to go forward with this to purposely sabotage him; there is no way they could think this would be beneficial to him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeloDude Posted March 31 Share Posted March 31 12 minutes ago, dream big said: I think someone on his PR team was cleared hot to go forward with this to purposely sabotage him; there is no way they could think this would be beneficial to him. But you’re not thinking how his inner circle thinks. Look at the border situation…they’ve doubled down on it. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now