The Next President is...

[Negatory]

17 minutes ago, Guardian said:

Not really SLACK. They are using facts and details to try and refute what they understood me to say. You just get emotional, call people names or put them down, say NUH UH, and go grab a victory mamosa.

Cheers Lt!

Dude just address the point above or take a break. Not being able to back down, no matter what, isn’t winning over many people.

[Guardian]

Dude. I did back down. Said you guys win. That’s fine. I don’t care to argue. I get it. What I said made you guys think something other than what I said. It’s a waste of time. I didn’t say 2600 trump votes. I didn’t say 5 total counties like this and he could win. I see how you guys think I was alluding to that but I wasn’t. Just pointing it out. And I said it makes a difference. I didn’t say trump wins trump wins screw all of you trump wins. I applaud you guys for trying to understand. I think if your didn’t you should have asked questions instead of accusing. Or making assumptions.

Oh yeah and the word SLACK is synonymous with limp.

[slackline]

Dude. I did back down. Said you guys win. That’s fine. I don’t care to argue. I get it. What I said made you guys think something other than what I said. It’s a waste of time. I didn’t say 2600 trump votes. I didn’t say 5 total counties like this and he could win. I see how you guys think I was alluding to that but I wasn’t. Just pointing it out. And I said it makes a difference. I didn’t say trump wins trump wins screw all of you trump wins. I applaud you guys for trying to understand. I think if your didn’t you should have asked questions instead of accusing. Or making assumptions.

Oh yeah and the word SLACK is synonymous with limp.

Love it, there's that class shining through. Clearly a mature, valued member of any squadron.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Guardian]

Haha. Now that’s funny

[Sim]

5 hours ago, 17D_guy said:

I'm sure @Sim is getting a BitChute video ready that supports all his positions.

Guardian can defend his own positions.  But if you want some juicy conspiracy right-wing theories, I can share a few.  

 

Dominion machines send voter count to Germany.

Those servers were raided by US military few days ago. 

Hard drives showed that Trump won by 420 electoral votes. 

With help of interdimensional aliens guided by Alex Jones. 

 

 

[Sim]

GA is having a lot of fun today. 

 

 

 

 

Edited November 18, 2020 by Sim

[Seadogs]

Lol, Wayne county didn't certify their results. Whoops, there goes MI. Isn't that a little bit strange? 

[slackline]

https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/security/trump-fires-head-u-s-election-cybersecurity-after-he-debunked-n1248063

Trump fired Chris Krebs via Twitter for having a spine... What a stand up president.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[17D_guy]

1 hour ago, Seadogs said:

Lol, Wayne county didn't certify their results. Whoops, there goes MI. Isn't that a little bit strange? 

Gee.. it's almost like there's a partisan reason it didn't happen this time instead of the past. Good to know the upstanding Republicans have really been interested in cleaning up this issue for years.

""Out of balance" poll books were also found in the August primary and the 2016 general election results, but the Wayne County board still had voted to certify the election, per the News...Detroit's poll books were found to be 72% out of balance in the August primary. Also, in 2016, vote totals for 59% of the Detroit precincts could not be reconciled, mostly because of finding too many had voted, per the News."

It goes to the next board up, then Sec State apparently according to that article.

@Sim yea...I'm not going to trust @trumprulzz for my latest/greatest news.  Here's an interesting question, why couldn't you link the tweet this bot account linked?  Why are you not just referencing the Newsmax tweet?

As for Heather Mullins, why does every "Real America's Voice" news article link to https://justthenews.com for the article text?  That's super legit for a trusted reporting sources. 

Why does she only have 2 tagged video articles from earlier this year, and 4 other ones that come up on site search. Again, totally normal for a professional news organization.

You click on "News" on their site, and it's their War Room podcast, which looks like it has Bannon on it a lot.  You legit think this site, and it's "reporters," are a credible source of news?  She doesn't even have a link to the site in her Twitter Bio. 

None of that is suspicious to you, but CNN, Fox, DailyWire...hell, the Washington Examiner, are too MSM for you to trust.  Damn...you're straight "Email Forwards from Grandma."  Let me know when your Nigerian Prince is ready to send you the money he promised.

[17D_guy]

6 minutes ago, slackline said:

https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/security/trump-fires-head-u-s-election-cybersecurity-after-he-debunked-n1248063

Trump fired Chris Krebs via Twitter for having a spine... What a stand up president.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That's too bad.  Dude is legit in the cyber community.  He knew what he was doing, and really turned that org around and got it working well with industry and community.

[Sim]

27 minutes ago, 17D_guy said:

Sim yea...I'm not going to trust @trumprulzz for my latest/greatest news.  Here's an interesting question, why couldn't you link the tweet this bot account linked?  Why are you not just referencing the Newsmax tweet?

I agree that info is shady to the max. I also don't know if newsmax post their videos which are easily linked. Call it lazy-shit-posting.  

Edit.   As for Heather Mullins. I have no freaking idea of who she is or if the info is legit. To me it seems legit. But time will tell. 

Edited November 18, 2020 by Sim

[Homestar]

9 hours ago, Sim said:

I agree that info is shady to the max. I also don't know if newsmax post their videos which are easily linked. Call it lazy-shit-posting.  

Edit.   As for Heather Mullins. I have no freaking idea of who she is or if the info is legit. To me it seems legit. But time will tell. 

Seems about right. Post now, fact check later (or not). Are you actually just @realDonaldTrump’s base ops burner account?

[slackline]

Lol, Wayne county didn't certify their results. Whoops, there goes MI. Isn't that a little bit strange? 

Oops...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-election-challenges/2020/11/17/ea741372-28f6-11eb-8fa2-06e7cbb145c0_story.html


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[Sua Sponte]

12 hours ago, Seadogs said:

Lol, Wayne county didn't certify their results. Whoops, there goes MI. Isn't that a little bit strange? 

I thought you went to your Parler safe space?

[Sim]

https://streamable.com/yhl89p

Why does left support this type of discourse? Video from Michigan certifying meeting.  

[brickhistory]

12 hours ago, slackline said:

https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/security/trump-fires-head-u-s-election-cybersecurity-after-he-debunked-n1248063

Trump fired Chris Krebs via Twitter for having a spine... What a stand up president.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Wow, a political appointee fired by a politician.

Shocked, I tell you.  Shocked.

 

v/r,

Gerald Walpin

[slackline]

38 minutes ago, brickhistory said:

Wow, a political appointee fired by a politician.

Shocked, I tell you.  Shocked.

 

v/r,

Gerald Walpin

You're right.  Not abnormal in the slightest in this revolving door administration.  Firing his own political appointee because he's a lauded cyber-security expert who doesn't stand by while he spout lies from his bully pulpit. As Sim says so frequently, nothing to see here.  Just making sure my propaganda machine is unhindered from things like truth and fact...

 

Not worth another reply, so I'll just throw it in here.  Gerald Walpin was a Bush appointee removed by Obama.  Totally the same thing...  Good point...🤦‍♂️

 

Makes me wonder, what administration has the record for most upper level positions constantly being rotated like we've seen the last 4 years.  Is this the first time, or have there been equally "temporary" admins in the past?

Edited November 18, 2020 by slackline
Question

[brickhistory]

Gerald Walpin agrees with you. The fact of why he was removed is important.

Edited November 18, 2020 by brickhistory

[slackline]

1 hour ago, brickhistory said:

Gerald Walpin agrees with you. The fact of why he was removed is important.

Dude, Obama wasn't a guy I voted for or liked.  Barking up the wrong tree.  Correct me if I'm wrong, Obama is more or less guilty of chronieism than Trump...

[Guardian]

I’ve never met such a ruthless vicious group of kind compassionate liberal minded just want to reunite the country group of people. Sore winners and it speaks loudly to how bad (or not badly) dems want to unite as to all the criticism levied against people for supporting the president.

[brickhistory]

Simply pointing out that executive branch members, including military officers, serve "at the pleasure of the President."

He/she can hire/fire anyone he/she wants anytime he/she wants.

It's not unprecedented, a threat to the republic, or a fraying of the national fabric.

Unless Trump does it, of course.  Then each and every one is nefarious.

 

 

[slackline]

41 minutes ago, brickhistory said:

Simply pointing out that executive branch members, including military officers, serve "at the pleasure of the President."

He/she can hire/fire anyone he/she wants anytime he/she wants.

It's not unprecedented, a threat to the republic, or a fraying of the national fabric.

Unless Trump does it, of course.  Then each and every one is nefarious.

 

 

I absolutely agree with you that he isn't the only one to ever do it, and at times for shady reasons even.  To be clear though, are you saying the rate at which Trump has done this, and the frequency with which he does it for the specific reasons he does it are commonplace in the executive?  I think you'd need to prove that point if so.  All presidents have done it, no one is denying that, or calling it a threat.  Just pointing out a very common trend with this particular president.  

[Sua Sponte]

5 hours ago, brickhistory said:

Gerald Walpin agrees with you. The fact of why he was removed is important.

Except the bipartisan CNCS asked the White House to review Walpin’s conduct as IG. Unlike a president who removed an appointed key figure who stated facts, which wasn’t inline with the president’s partisan, and legally unproven as of yet, narrative he’s spewing.

Edited November 18, 2020 by Sua Sponte

[M2]

This shit just makes me laugh....

The Firing of Chris Krebs Is What an Attack On Democracy Looks Like

 

[slackline]

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/11/18/republicans-denounce-trump-krebs-cybersecurity-437716?cid=apn

Yup, ridiculous when your own party can't understand why you fired a guy you appointed for no reason other than doing a good job. Weird...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk