Guest nsplayr Posted February 20 Posted February 20 I’m in board with kicking Boeing straight in the junk but what’s the alternative, buy an Airbus and start over with all the bespoke requirements of AF1? Maybe we shouldn’t have allowed so much corporate consolidation and monopoly building over the last 40 years, then we would actually have other options. Boeing is too big to fail in commercial aviation, just like LM, Amazon, Google, etc. are in their industries.
brabus Posted February 20 Posted February 20 (edited) Therein lies the prime issue. We’ve fucked up for too long, time to rip the bandaid off and start fresh, which means there will be short term pain in a lot of ways, but as a society we’ve been way too focused on the now and barely even aware of what does 5, 10, 20 years down the road look like? As Tree said in another thread, we’ve already fucked unborn generations - it has to stop now. If we do, maybe 3-4 generations from now will be free of the financial impacts of their predecessors idiotic decisions. Edited February 20 by brabus 1 3
herkbier Posted February 21 Posted February 21 Much like gun laws that we have and just need to enforce appropriately.. the primes need to be held accountable. Financially and probably criminally. The primes may have a monopoly on the product, but the US government in many ways has a monopoly on consuming the product.. time to start exercising that monopolistic power. 1
disgruntledemployee Posted February 21 Posted February 21 DOGE should just cancel it. Trump can fly on his own plane. 1
SurelySerious Posted February 21 Posted February 21 DOGE should just cancel it. Trump can fly on his own plane.That assumes he’ll just become dictator and be able to go for 3+ terms.
disgruntledemployee Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago On 2/21/2025 at 3:15 PM, SurelySerious said: That assumes he’ll just become dictator and be able to go for 3+ terms. I stand unastonished. Not only will he take the gifted palace plane, he'll have use AF taxpayer money modify it, and he'll keep it afterwards. I say if he's gonna keep it, he has to refund the tax $$ used to modify it. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=121680511
Clark Griswold Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago Just switch to 777 Not cheap, not easy but if king for a day it would be part of a 777 mil variant project, tanker/mobility, VVIP, new NECAP platforms.
Standby Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 5 minutes ago, Clark Griswold said: Just switch to 777 Not cheap, not easy but if king for a day it would be part of a 777 mil variant project, tanker/mobility, VVIP, new NECAP platforms. Dreamliner will do just fine. 1
Clark Griswold Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 1 minute ago, Standby said: Dreamliner will do just fine. Too beaucoup gi? 1 1
Standby Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 8 minutes ago, Clark Griswold said: Too beaucoup gi? I think so. I get the desire for the biggest and baddest. That said, I think it ultimately comes down to the engine redundancy…quads vs ETOPS. If it wasn’t for that, I think the 787 would take the cake based on higher cruise speed with comparable range.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now