1 hour ago1 hr Would be awesome if the government's response is basically, "yeah, that makes sense, we agree".Break break:That firearm for the Inn-n-out shooting is interesting. Anyone have a silencer on their EDC? I guess it wouldn't be too big of a deal for an off-body carry or truck gun. Also, depending on the round and the silencer, it might give the good guy a few extra chances of hitting his target before the active shooter realizes he's being engaged and from where, especially since his ears are likely ringing from the first few shots.
1 hour ago1 hr 5 minutes ago, Smokin said:Would be awesome if the government's response is basically, "yeah, that makes sense, we agree".Break break:That firearm for the Inn-n-out shooting is interesting. Anyone have a silencer on their EDC? I guess it wouldn't be too big of a deal for an off-body carry or truck gun. Also, depending on the round and the silencer, it might give the good guy a few extra chances of hitting his target before the active shooter realizes he's being engaged and from where, especially since his ears are likely ringing from the first few shots.It makes all the sense in the world. That being said, I would never ever do it. You don't want to be in front of a jury having used a gun that is anything but a normal, boring gun. No punisher decals, no quippy phrases, and no "scary" accessories.
48 minutes ago48 min 2 hours ago, ClearedHot said:The ruling gave the government a 7 day stay to respond...next week is going to be very interesting.Guess we'll see how 2A friendly our current administration is with regards to an appeal. One thing I've noticed is governments HATE to give up power no matter who's in charge. Prosecutors like to keep statutes like these on the books to hold over certain defendants to coerce please deals. Edited 46 minutes ago46 min by fire4effect
Create an account or sign in to comment