-
Posts
3,426 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
43
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Blogs
Downloads
Wiki
Everything posted by Clark Griswold
-
No doubt at 81k lbs of thrust per motor if the pylons could take that. With that it would have another 25k lbs of thrust to deliver freedom with no telling how much lower fuel burn. Avgeek page on re-engine stuff on ye old BUFF: https://theaviationgeekclub.com/usaf-materiel-command-history-office-releases-graphics-of-historical-efforts-to-re-engine-the-b-52-strategic-bomber/
-
BUFF with 787 engines
-
F-15X on the Air Force's Budget Request
Clark Griswold replied to VMFA187's topic in General Discussion
Just adding this to the thread for more context with the difference of opinions aired on the Tornado https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U4Hs0Jm1ACY Good listen if you've got an hour. -
More build up of Russian forces, more fighting with separatists in the Donbass region. https://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2021/04/07/russia-continues-massing-military-hardware-ukrainian-border/
-
Goodbye US led world order then, hello whatever comes next. I dislike free riding allies who talk us down and are ungrateful (at least publicly) but I doubt the world order that comes in the wake of Pax Americana is one we would be ok with. Unless we are willing to ditch globalization to the max extent possible re-industrializing our economy, eschewing owing debt to unfriendly countries, severely limiting migration/engagement (foreign residents, students, etc...) for some period of time (likely 20 years) for economic and security reasons and only carefully choosing any further foreign entanglements or military engagements... the future where we let vulnerable nations at the periphery of our sphere of influence meet whatever fate they meet is not one I would want. I'm ok with doing all of the above and becoming far more removed from the fray, I just think the consensus required to actually do that and create a far more independent and resilient Fortress America is not there, too many elites in America are invested in Global America vs. Fortress America so it's just not realistic IMHO. What to do if the winds of war with Russia blow over Ukraine? * Lethal aid, cyber, financial and SOF / PMC as COA 1. * Lethal aid, cyber, financial and Conventional Military Deployment to Western Ukraine (west of the Dnieper) at the public request of the sovereign, independent government of Ukraine as COA 2. - Deployed forces would be US + partners willing to immediately go (thinking UK, Australia, Poland, Baltics, Romania, etc...) - Size TBD but go big or don't go, 8 BCTs plus deployment of 3 CAF wings from the states. - Plan on this mission becoming a new Korea, long term / permanent deterrence presence. * Lethal aid, cyber, financial and Conventional Military Deployment to Western Ukraine (west of the Dnieper) at the public request of the sovereign, independent government of Ukraine as COA 3 but under NATO with the immediate incorporation of Ukraine as a NATO partner, status of the Crimea accepted as is now with no action nor recognition as Russian Federation territory. All other caveats remain for this COA but drawing on the Europeans for about 75% of the deployed forces. Info on Ukraine and population / language / cultural / political composition: https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/odr/could-partition-solve-ukraines-problems/ https://www.polgeonow.com/2014/03/ukraine-divisions-election-language.html Haven't read these but this what the Googler came back with: https://fivebooks.com/best-books/ukraine-marci-shore/
-
Is it time in returning to the old days of UPT?
Clark Griswold replied to alwyn2d's topic in General Discussion
Yup, if yours truly were king for a day and still had to live in the realm of finite resources I would fix the Heavy Track Phase 3 problem thusly: Outsource to All ATPs or another contractor a ME program to get 25 hours of ME training. Get the bounces in the contractor's aircrafts and some more experience for Stanley. Return to your home base for T-1 training in a refurbished Nextant 400Ti. As you did your ME training and have your Instruments done in already in T-6s, you would have a short Instrument / Qual phase (no phase check) and fly this updated T-1 with avionics to get experience in datalink, BLOS voice, autopilot/autothrottles, FMS, mobility mission planning & execution, etc... Would not beat to shit this trainer in pointless and repetitive ground checks, bounce after bounce after bounce, but as what it should be, an introduction to flying crew aircraft with mission and flight management systems that must be set, monitored and used correctly to get a mobility/recon msn done Now back to reality... -
Is it time in returning to the old days of UPT?
Clark Griswold replied to alwyn2d's topic in General Discussion
This. Not saying that having a different trainer for studs tracking to the heavy / crew track is better but having a real advanced trainer for them is a must. Never flew the T-6 but if back in the day if they had just given the deplorables an extended T-37 course vs another more complex trainer it would not have been the same. Having to quickly learn another aircraft, more complex systems and get more cross country, simulated mobility missions and planning was good. Not perfect but worthwhile training, my opinion only. Everything is worth what you paid for it, min run training / go cheap and don't be surprised with what happens. -
Notice the operative verb used over and over was feel, I felt this I felt that. He had no specific instances of racial discrimination, intimidation or reprisal to cite. He referenced his feedback received at different moments in his career and his interpretation of them as more evidence than the AF and the people in it in his community were aligned mostly against him based on his race, but he moved up. If the institution / some of the people in it are so bad/racist/unfair, how the hell did he get where he is in the AF? When you look around you think everyone or most are X derogatory thing, maybe you are the problem and not the institution / people in it... IDK, more context is necessary here but at first blanch he seems like a high performing type A who made it into a community of other high performing type A's and like every operational community, it has only so many upper level slots / prestigious vertical upward paths, not all will make it thru their filters. Like him, I have zero evidence to reference beyond my hunch but 40 something years of life and 20 years in the AF lend me to this suspicion.
-
Is it time in returning to the old days of UPT?
Clark Griswold replied to alwyn2d's topic in General Discussion
As to a return to the OPs original question on going back to UPT vs SUPT, UPT would be IMO better for the AF overall and would make a less bifurcated and cohesive Rated cadre If SUPT were not already atrophied and going to get worse I would at least keep it versus SUPT 2 point whatever where everyone not tracking fighters gets fornicated with a rusty pipe An idea, why not contract out Phase 3 completely like IFT with AF evaluating the final product? Pay for it thru O&M and only rent not buy. Figure $100k per stud to a contractor for 75 flight hours and 15 simulator hours, classroom instruction 75 million plus costs for TDY but just WAGing it at a per FY thru put of 750 studs, it would probably be around 95 million or so for every thing. Less than fixing these T-1s and dudes get real flying and the money could be found eliminating that which is not actually necessary https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/39945/the-air-force-spent-134m-to-repair-39-hail-damaged-t-1-jet-trainers-its-about-to-retire Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
Things you should listen to drunk while on BO
Clark Griswold replied to Clark Griswold's topic in Squadron Bar
K-Billy's Super Sounds of the 70s weekend Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
Things you should listen to drunk while on BO
Clark Griswold replied to Clark Griswold's topic in Squadron Bar
Just high on life at the moment Gimme the Shat anytime to make it swanky One more to nerd out on: Remember drunkenness is required to really appreciate these fine selections Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
Things you should listen to drunk while on BO
Clark Griswold replied to Clark Griswold's topic in Squadron Bar
Add these to the list: Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
Legit point The mention of their interest in the Gripen E was interesting, surprised we haven’t heard (yet) a PLAAF fighter with an OMS for rapid integration/modification of systems I bagged on the techno novel 2034 but the authors did have one threat right, Chinese cyber capes via embedded malware (hardware & software) delivered or activated by a nondirect broadcast As they make a shit ton of chips, boards, drives, etc... I’m sure they (CCP) haven’t thought of this... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Yeah but I’ve got hope buried under a lot a cynicism that you, me and most others are not the only ones realizing that blathering away about immutable or irrelevant differences is not in the long run worth it Still holding out hope for a non straight white male heterosexual GO to say to whatever SJW / PC politician or political appointee trying to make them a poster boy for X cause “ f you Im not your toy” As to the original subject of this thread, either this is a moment of uncharacteristic honest assessment from the PLAAF on its performance that slipped out or disinformation https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/defense/2020-02-08/plaaf-senior-pilot-reveals-poor-performance-joint-exercise-rtaf?fbclid=IwAR2vYhx5CUm8PjYjuk9mJoBOysZKYmbTbOmDeh373u1nqdwkE64mLlj6aBM Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
True I should not have put the accusation on them, neoliberal / neoconservative globalists are the culprits It’s shaping up to be western corporate power structures vs Eurasian autocracies fighting proxy wars, high tension stand offs and cold technology / information wars. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Things you should listen to drunk while on BO
Clark Griswold replied to Clark Griswold's topic in Squadron Bar
The aftermath... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
-
What was the facilitator’s reaction to your brazen belief that individuals are allowed to have their own beliefs and that if those beliefs do not affect the mission or unit that it is no one’s business? Like you I would just avoid said hypothetical bigot’s company Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Love the ideas from Hush Kit, Top Gear for aviation The Ultimate What-if: British Aerospace Super Lightning | Hush-Kit
-
All this Air Force / DoD mid-level leadership virtue signaling bullshit is a gold mine for cheap shot jokes. I am seeing on FB now, O-6s I knew as O-3s spouting the political line to score higher in some apparatchiks list of approved officers for O-7. So this is how the end begins...
-
Offensive squadron patches are a serious matter in the Peoples Non-Binary Trans-Unicorn Positive Affirmation Air Force. They are often contrary to the ultimate goal of creating the impossible utopia that we will use any means to attempt to achieve for the 690th time.
-
You went thru SERE, go back to the circle whenever possible, food-water-shelter.
-
No but, everyone deserves the benefit of the doubt but the electronically documented exchanges are not good. Things can be faked but there comes a preponderance of shit when the voters just move on, too much bullshit. He's not a bad guy and I really hope this is not something that taints an otherwise good tenure where he represented a part of the Republican party I don't ascribe too but respect his honest defense of his wing's beliefs and policy positions.
-
Not good https://nationalfile.com/opponent-demands-answers-from-kinzinger-for-russian-internship-racy-photo-intimidation-scandal/