Guest Raptor08 Posted May 19, 2010 Share Posted May 19, 2010 So here's a question...with the F-35 supposedly dropping out of UPT in the next 3ish years, what impact would that have on the 38 drops and class sizes? I would think at some point the wave has to go back up, it's not going to be a 1 for 1 trade of pilots out of vipers and hogs and such into the 35, guys are bound to retire, etc. In the past few years we've been dropping only a handful of guys to the pointy noses, is there any chance of that scaling back up or is this probably going to be the norm until skynet and the RPAs take over. I had a similar question and while I'm not going to pretend to know I'd guess it will be far more than 3ish years. Remember the F-22 only started becoming available (and it was short lived) to UPT studs about 10 years after production began (1998 started deliveries, operational in 2005, first 4 UPT drops in late 2007). Unless the F-35 program is sped up (and its already years behind schedule) I'd imagine we won't be seeing any Lightning II drops for another 5-6 years min. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brabus Posted May 19, 2010 Share Posted May 19, 2010 Based on info from dudes in the program, UPT won't be seeing these till at least 2016, with realistically more like 2018-2020. They don't even expect to start the "influx" of CAF guys until 2014. And that's "best case." So, figure 2 yrs min before they start dropping them to UPT, but probably longer than that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WillFlyForCoffee Posted March 26, 2016 Share Posted March 26, 2016 First stud F-35 dropped to CBM today with the added caveat "you'll be able to compete with your other IFF classmates," but it was on the screen. Thread revived. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HuggyU2 Posted March 26, 2016 Share Posted March 26, 2016 What was his class ranking? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Day Man Posted March 26, 2016 Share Posted March 26, 2016 8 hours ago, Huggyu2 said: What was his class ranking? "Pretty darn good." 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClearedHot Posted November 2, 2023 Share Posted November 2, 2023 Fat Amy gets a kill! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clark Griswold Posted January 29 Share Posted January 29 Czechia Signs to Buy U.S. F-35 Jets https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2024/01/29/czechia-signs-to-buy-u-s-f-35-jets/IDK, seems like we’re encouraging an ally to buy a very pricy system when if they bought a less expensive one (in greater numbers) to acquire/operate/sustain they might be better off in the long run (FA-50 for example)Just my opinion from the cheap seats but a better COA is to plan for our smaller allies to bring more less capable but relevant systems to the party and Uncle Sam brings the exquisite capes rather than expecting them to be mini versions of usSent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brabus Posted January 29 Share Posted January 29 All about money and shinny new things. The Swiss have zero need for the F-35. It’s actually probably a negative for them, and should have gone with Block 70 Vipers, new Super Hornets, etc. Similar applies to multiple partner countries. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clark Griswold Posted January 29 Share Posted January 29 All about money and shinny new things. The Swiss have zero need for the F-35. It’s actually probably a negative for them, and should have gone with Block 70 Vipers, new Super Hornets, etc. Similar applies to multiple partner countries.YupI think this is “fixing the glitch” in whatever’s F-35 numbers you wanna believe More operators for bigger economies of scale for more ways to hide higher than published life cycle costsWhat the hell, just print some more money and shovel it around… Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lawman Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 YupI think this is “fixing the glitch” in whatever’s F-35 numbers you wanna believe More operators for bigger economies of scale for more ways to hide higher than published life cycle costsWhat the hell, just print some more money and shovel it around… Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkIt’s also far easier to deal with the attritional impact of Large Scale Combat and rebuild our numbers post conflict by simply buying up their spares at premium with the promise of new shiny later.A country that sits in the NATO order of battle like for example Moldova doesn’t need F-35s, or Abrams, or really any other top line piece of tech that isn’t worn/carried. But it can rent them for a while…. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
di1630 Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 Fighters are a source of pride. Most NATO allies need more support aircraft but they don’t look good at airshows. Some allies are buying shiny new F-35s and still using the missiles they bought from the 90s. Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network mobile app 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uhhello Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 1 hour ago, di1630 said: Fighters are a source of pride. Most NATO allies need more support aircraft but they don’t look good at airshows. Some allies are buying shiny new F-35s and still using the missiles they bought from the 90s. Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network mobile app And they have 90s missiles with about 10 total spares 🙂 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now