Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 5/2/2025 at 6:40 PM, ClearedHot said:

"Baddie Brown people? " Just stop man...a completely useless comment. 

Question the strategy all you want...I think we all want to see something solid so we don;t get sucked into another rabbit hole but your comment was classless.

Jesus the things that go over you guys' heads sometimes. The entire point of saying "baddie brown people" is that is how the government views them: just the latest group of troublemaker muslims that we're going to dehumanize and bomb into oblivion.. because reasons.  So much so that in the signal chat operation Pete so generously shared with us, we leveled an entire apartment building to get one guy (show me where that is on the CDE tables.)

And is the irony lost on literally everyone that to debunk my claim we've been bombing the Houthis to no avail for years @GKinnear says: (paraphrasing) "actually Obama was bombing the dudes on the other side of the gang war."   ... and that makes it better how? If anything that proves the strategy is even more incoherent than we thought if we're bombing both sides of a gang war separated by only a few years.

Ultimately, I'm not here trying to claim the Houthis are model citizens of the world or that disrupting global shipping is okay. But I'm seeing a lot of the "rah rah rah LFG rah rah rah fuck with my boats and get ready to find out" energy that has gotten us into multiple previous middle east boondoggles, so I think it's valuable to have some pushback against that mentality to balance the conversation.  Especially when so far they seem to be fucking with our boats rather effectively.  I'm not sure why we seem so intent on parking our boats within "fuck with me" range, handing the Houthis and Iran massive PR wins with each hornet that goes into the drink. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Pooter said:

Jesus the things that go over you guys' heads sometimes. The entire point of saying "baddie brown people" is that is how the government views them: just the latest group of troublemaker muslims that we're going to dehumanize and bomb into oblivion.. because reasons.  So much so that in the signal chat operation Pete so generously shared with us, we leveled an entire apartment building to get one guy (show me where that is on the CDE tables.)

I've NEVER heard the government say Muslims are viewed as "Baddie Brown People"...just the liberals on this forum.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Pooter said:

Jesus the things that go over you guys' heads sometimes. The entire point of saying "baddie brown people" is that is how the government views them: just the latest group of troublemaker muslims that we're going to dehumanize and bomb into oblivion.. because reasons.  So much so that in the signal chat operation Pete so generously shared with us, we leveled an entire apartment building to get one guy (show me where that is on the CDE tables.)

And is the irony lost on literally everyone that to debunk my claim we've been bombing the Houthis to no avail for years @GKinnear says: (paraphrasing) "actually Obama was bombing the dudes on the other side of the gang war."   ... and that makes it better how? If anything that proves the strategy is even more incoherent than we thought if we're bombing both sides of a gang war separated by only a few years.

Ultimately, I'm not here trying to claim the Houthis are model citizens of the world or that disrupting global shipping is okay. But I'm seeing a lot of the "rah rah rah LFG rah rah rah fuck with my boats and get ready to find out" energy that has gotten us into multiple previous middle east boondoggles, so I think it's valuable to have some pushback against that mentality to balance the conversation.  Especially when so far they seem to be fucking with our boats rather effectively.  I'm not sure why we seem so intent on parking our boats within "fuck with me" range, handing the Houthis and Iran massive PR wins with each hornet that goes into the drink. 

Well, the coherent thought is "you fuck with us and we'll fuck you up". 

AQAP was actively planning, inspiring, and executing external operations against Americans...we left the Houthis alone because they weren't bothering us.  In fact, Houthis and AQAP fighting each other, when it happened, was enjoyable to watch because that was less AQAP to worry about.

Since the Houthis are now attacking an ally (granted, a non-treaty one, but stated as a policy position for every president since 1947), taking civilian commercial ships hostage, and threatening the economic status of the world (again...BAM is a critical chokepoint and economic security is a part of national security)...yeah, the Houthis made themselves a valid target for American street justice.

In fact, you could argue they're a more valid target than Iraq in 1991 was...Houthis still aren't the recognized government in Yemen and they are a client state of Iran (state-sponsored terror and whatnot).

Again...this isn't rocket surgery.

r/PeterExplainsTheJoke - YOU DON'T OPERATE DO YOU SON?

Edited by GKinnear
I compensate for not being a good speller by not knowing how to type
Posted

lol and now we "negotiate" a cease fire between the US and the Houthis that doesn't include Israel.  YGBSM

https://allisrael.com/houthi-rebels-clarify-that-ceasefire-with-u-s-does-not-include-israel-will-continue-to-act-in-support-of-gaza

you guys are right, this isn't rocket surgery. It's just complete stupidity. We spent 1 billion https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/trump-operation-houthis-cost-1-billion-rcna205333 striking the houthis, didn't dislodge them in any meaningful way, dumped 3 super hornets into the red sea, pulled back with our tail between our legs, and Israeli ships are still going to be shot at.

Maybe a 'real operator' can explain it to me but this looks almost as successful as our Afghanistan withdrawal

  • Upvote 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Pooter said:

lol and now we "negotiate" a cease fire between the US and the Houthis that doesn't include Israel.  YGBSM

https://allisrael.com/houthi-rebels-clarify-that-ceasefire-with-u-s-does-not-include-israel-will-continue-to-act-in-support-of-gaza

you guys are right, this isn't rocket surgery. It's just complete stupidity. We spent 1 billion https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/trump-operation-houthis-cost-1-billion-rcna205333 striking the houthis, didn't dislodge them in any meaningful way, dumped 3 super hornets into the red sea, pulled back with our tail between our legs, and Israeli ships are still going to be shot at.

Maybe a 'real operator' can explain it to me but this looks almost as successful as our Afghanistan withdrawal

And Biden spent $230M on his floating pier to Gaza that did jack and shit for the Israel - Hamas war...now you care about money spent?

https://www.reuters.com/world/bidens-gaza-pier-injured-far-more-troops-than-previously-known-2025-05-07/

I also see the Houthi statement has been unconfirmed by anyone in the administration...maybe it's true, maybe not.

If it true (big IF) then I'd argue the administration has chosen poorly and needs to restart the air campaign against the Houthis if they manage to land another missile in Israel.

I also don't believe if they keep shooting at ships, of any nation, that the current POTUS will just sit by and allow it to happen.  Again, fuck with us and we'll fuck you up.

"Tail between our legs"...sounds like you don't have a super accurate read on the current situation...I stand by my previous posts.

Edited by GKinnear
Posted
58 minutes ago, GKinnear said:

And Biden spent $230M on his floating pier to Gaza that did jack and shit for the Israel - Hamas war...now you care about money spent?

https://www.reuters.com/world/bidens-gaza-pier-injured-far-more-troops-than-previously-known-2025-05-07/

Two things can be true at once.

Biden pier = really fucking dumb idea

This houthi debacle = also really fucking dumb idea

1 hour ago, GKinnear said:

I also see the Houthi statement has been unconfirmed by anyone in the administration...maybe it's true, maybe not.

😂 yeah you might be waiting for that confirmation a while..

Administration: "my fellow Americans, after talks with the houthis we can now confidently confirm our strategy was completely pointless and we are now back to square one."

Posted
1 hour ago, Pooter said:

 

Biden pier = really fucking dumb idea

 

Instead of playing a game of one-upmanship, I went back and re-read all your posts to make sure I didn't misconstruct anything.  Some points have merit...your original question was "what's different this time?" is valid for any operation, and in this one, to paraphrase other posts, it's difficult to bomb someone to the stone age when they're already there.

However, let me ask what you would do if you were the ultimate decider, to stop the Houthis from sending TBMs & OWA drones into an ally's territory, and were attacking innocent ships of all nations traveling through the BAM?

There are three basic options: do nothing, full-scale nuclear war, or something in between.

An oppositional attitude can be useful in the planning process...too many yes-men and there's no critical thought developing the plan.

You're obviously not a fan of the current COA, so what would you do differently?  I'm truly interested.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...