The Next President is...

[Sua Sponte]

Or maybe other media outlets cannot very the authenticity of the source and/or story? There’s probably reason why only Trump friendly Fox News and the NY Post is running stories about Biden approximately two weeks from the election.
 

I highly doubt it’s some massive suppression conspiracy, but I’m sure the Russians already found what to display in front of you, based on your metadata, so you can share on forums like this.

https://www.businessinsider.com/new-york-post-hunter-joe-biden-giuliani-red-flags-disinformation-2020-10

Edited October 22, 2020 by Sua Sponte

[slackline]

Media is ignoring this. More people know about Guilliani and Borat then Bobulinski.  Just this simple fact shows that media is suppressing and playing defense for Corrupt Bidens - shows how much fake they are.  
 
https://nypost.com/2020/10/22/hunter-biz-partner-confirms-e-mail-details-joe-bidens-push-to-make-millions-from-china/

"how much fake they are".

Seriously, I hope that was a typo, or you're going to have trouble with your GRU supervisor.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Guardian]

When I said do better, I was referring to a perceived tendency of yours to infer things from what people say, not just me. Then you proceed to “educate” people on what you erroneously attributed to them.

What questions am I not answering? When I make a point to highlight yet again that I am not advocating for universal healthcare, and I also agreed with a lot of your points on why it wouldn’t work in our country, there is no longer really any valid questions coming from you that merit an answer. I don’t care what countries are socialist and what aren’t. Had nothing to do with the point I made. Go back and reread what I said (that’s also part of the “do better”. Read the words people say, not what you want it to say so you can then “educate” them again) because it’s pretty clear what I was saying.

So, once again, my bad if I’ve skipped any questions. Hit me again, Ike, and this time put some stank on it. I’ll answer your questions.

I brought those countries up because they have literally been mentioned in here a few times the last few days as examples of countries that do have systems closer to socialist programs with higher taxes and universal healthcare. The people living in said countries seem to be pretty dang happy with it, so I asked why there was a need to constantly belittle what is clearly working for, and making those people happy. It doesn’t mean that’s what I think we should be doing here.

Let me make it painfully clear one more time: my bottom line is that our current system sucks. We can do better. I encourage the discussion in here because there are smart people on this subject that have brought up smart points. There’s a couple of old cranks in here that just refuse change because that’s in their nature. I’m not engaging with those people. I’m engaging with the people that bring something to the table even if we’re “just tilting at windmills...” Who knows, maybe someone in this forum will one day be instrumental in the future policy making of this awesome country. This “tilting” might just make a difference. I know I’ve learned from both sides of the conversation.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Haha. Not inferring anything. If anything I’m super literal and take your statements at face value in an effort to not infer anything. I very much dislike being taken out of context and something is then made up about my opinion.

Feel free to go back and review where I ask you questions. Or ask you why you say a particular statement and I question it and instead of clarifying, refuting, or debating you then make attacks on my character.

I agree with your statement that our current system can be better. And I think that future is further away from providing “free” health care to all. Just like the tax system. A flat tax makes much more sense for all. But people seem to think that if you are successful you should pay more. Not if you spend more you should pay more. Just a very victim mentality and socialist view point that hasn’t ever worked out in the worlds history that I’m aware of. I’m wrong all the time though.

Are the people you claim that refuse to change because they are old that way for a reason? Assuming they are old on an internet chat room might not be the best. Better yet challenge them and ask why they believe that way. You might find more historical and experiential insight into why they don’t think the change being proposed is good instead of writing them off. It more likely comes across as they don’t agree with you or don’t have new ideas you might agree with so they are discarded. If that’s not your opinion then good. As it is a prevalent opinion out there these days. Hence “okay boomer.”

[Guardian]

I think it’s a safe bet he will do his best to implement more anti gun regulation. How successful he is will depend on several factors. 

I think it’s funny how liberals like guns more than republicans. They just disagree who should have them. Liberals think only the government should. Republicans think the private citizens should have them as well

Now liberals want to defund the police force and the military. Interesting.

[Sim]

1 hour ago, Sua Sponte said:

Or maybe other media outlets cannot very the authenticity of the source and/or story?

Like they did Steele Dossier? Or Trump taxes? Or Ukraine lies? Anonymous intelligence leaks? 

There is a receipt with his signature, pictures of said person, emails that are confirmed by recipient of those emails, statements by people working with Biden, FBI investigation into CP and money laundering, FBI disposition with laptop serial number, FBI/DOJ saying it's not a Russian disinformation campaign.  

Left - "cannot authenticate" 

 

[Sim]

44 minutes ago, slackline said:

"how much fake they are".

Seriously, I hope that was a typo, or you're going to have trouble with your GRU supervisor.

Learn to read between the lines. I'm calling CNN, ABC, NBC, NPR, MSNBC, WashPost, NYT and the rest of the media playing defensive omission of the news to protect their favorite party.  But that doesn't surprise me since most people still have no clue what spy-gate is about - the biggest scandate in last 50 years.    

[Negatory]

55 minutes ago, Guardian said:

A flat tax makes much more sense for all. But people seem to think that if you are successful you should pay more. Not if you spend more you should pay more. Just a very victim mentality and socialist view point that hasn’t ever worked out in the worlds history that I’m aware of. I’m wrong all the time though.

I assume you are referring to the socialist United States of America of 1936-1980. 🇺🇸 

[slackline]

Haha. Not inferring anything. If anything I’m super literal and take your statements at face value in an effort to not infer anything. I very much dislike being taken out of context and something is then made up about my opinion.

Feel free to go back and review where I ask you questions. Or ask you why you say a particular statement and I question it and instead of clarifying, refuting, or debating you then make attacks on my character.

I agree with your statement that our current system can be better. And I think that future is further away from providing “free” health care to all. Just like the tax system. A flat tax makes much more sense for all. But people seem to think that if you are successful you should pay more. Not if you spend more you should pay more. Just a very victim mentality and socialist view point that hasn’t ever worked out in the worlds history that I’m aware of. I’m wrong all the time though.

Are the people you claim that refuse to change because they are old that way for a reason? Assuming they are old on an internet chat room might not be the best. Better yet challenge them and ask why they believe that way. You might find more historical and experiential insight into why they don’t think the change being proposed is good instead of writing them off. It more likely comes across as they don’t agree with you or don’t have new ideas you might agree with so they are discarded. If that’s not your opinion then good. As it is a prevalent opinion out there these days. Hence “okay boomer.”

Don't have tons of time, but your idea of a personal attack is seemingly very broad...

I say they're old because I know they're already retired. I'm almost there, but they went years ago, so at least older than me, and I'm older than a lot. I stand by my statement.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Sua Sponte]

33 minutes ago, Sim said:

Like they did Steele Dossier? Or Trump taxes? Or Ukraine lies? Anonymous intelligence leaks? 

There is a receipt with his signature, pictures of said person, emails that are confirmed by recipient of those emails, statements by people working with Biden, FBI investigation into CP and money laundering, FBI disposition with laptop serial number, FBI/DOJ saying it's not a Russian disinformation campaign.  

Left - "cannot authenticate" 

 

For one the FBI hasn’t said anything other than they “have nothing to add” to what the DNI said. They’re not going to comment on an ongoing investigation.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/fbi-hunter-biden-laptop-russia/2020/10/20/3478408a-133d-11eb-bc10-40b25382f1be_story.html

“The Washington Post has been unable to verify the authenticity of any of the emails published by the New York Post, and the Biden campaign has disputed the New York Post’s claims about what the emails show.”

 

[Sim]

24 minutes ago, Sua Sponte said:

“The Washington Post has been unable to verify the authenticity of any of the emails published by the New York Post, and the Biden campaign has disputed the New York Post’s claims about what the emails show.”

 

"1) FBI & DOJ concur w/ Ratcliffe that Hunter Biden's laptop & the emails in question weren't part of a Russian disinformation campaign," Fox News producer Sean Langille tweeted Tuesday evening. "2) The FBI DOES have possession of the Hunter Biden laptop in question." He said it was first reported by Fox News's Justice Department producer Jake Gibson.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/fbi-and-doj-do-not-believe-hunter-biden-laptop-part-of-russian-disinformation-campaign

 

Oh look! More releases. 

Money laundering! 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/laptop-hunter-biden-linked-fbi-money-laundering-probe

Many democrats involved! 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/jim-hunter-biden-china-joint-venture-key-contacts

Edited October 22, 2020 by Sim

[Sua Sponte]

You respond by citing a tweet from the Fox News Producer and a known Conservative bias magazine/website.

https://www.allsides.com/news-source/washington-examiner

I guess the DNI doesn’t speak for the entire intelligence community.

https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000175-4393-d7aa-af77-579f9b330000

Edited October 22, 2020 by Sua Sponte

[Sim]

Remember folks, only liberal media is authoritative source and only they can report it.

[slackline]

Remember folks, only liberal media is authoritative source and only they can report it.

Dude, Flea, KA, Guardian and many others have about a thousand times more credibility than you.

Maybe you're legit, my apologies if you are, but you scream "troll" from the rooftop...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Sua Sponte]

19 minutes ago, Sim said:

Remember folks, only liberal media is authoritative source and only they can report it.

Uh, NPR is centered bias, especially when compared MSNBC/CNN. Just because you don’t like what they said doesn’t mean your opinion, or theirs, is codified as fact.

https://www.allsides.com/news-source/npr-media-bias

[17D_guy]

1 hour ago, Sim said:

Remember folks, only liberal media is authoritative source and only they can report it.

Is it harder for you on here because there's no "Share" button like on Facebook/Twitter for your echo chamber bullshit to spread?

Story isn't even on https://www.drudgereport.com/ for coverage right now.

 

 

[Sim]

1 hour ago, Sua Sponte said:

Uh, NPR is centered bias, especially when compared MSNBC/CNN

President Ronald Reagan once observed: “The trouble with our Liberal friends is not that they're ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so.”

 

https://www.journalism.org/2020/01/24/americans-are-divided-by-party-in-the-sources-they-turn-to-for-political-news/pj_2020-01-24_media-polarization_2-02/

 

[Sim]

10 minutes ago, 17D_guy said:

Story isn't even on https://www.drudgereport.com/ for coverage right now.

You probably don't know this...but drudgereport died long time ago. It's no longer a conservatives news portal.  Many sites have taken over such as  https://rantingly.com/  or https://bonginoreport.com/

[Sim]

1 hour ago, slackline said:

Maybe you're legit, my apologies if you are, but you scream "troll" from the rooftop...

You keep calling me a Russian GRU officer and I'm the "troll". You think I have zero credibility? You're so far stuck in your bubble that any source or link that I post is a russian disinformation.  Exit legacy media and view something else with different opinions. Example  https://www.youtube.com/c/RonPaulLibertyReport  or https://youtu.be/ZnzXJh6J1pc

 

[slackline]

You keep calling me a Russian GRU officer and I'm the "troll". You think I have zero credibility? You're so far stuck in your bubble that any source or link that I post is a russian disinformation.  Exit legacy media and view something else with different opinions. Example  https://www.youtube.com/c/RonPaulLibertyReport  or 

 

Ok, typos from time to time are totally understandable on these dumb phones with autocorrect, but your grammar is consistently off just enough to be a troll or a bot.

I speak 4 languages fluently. You have enough mistakes made by non-native speakers that it's questionable. Maybe you grew up in a non-english speaking house, if so, that's cool. I got no problem with it, just saying, you sound shady...

Who's our smart people with sniffing these trolls out? He literally only posts propaganda.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[bfargin]

3 hours ago, Negatory said:

I assume you are referring to the socialist United States of America of 1936-1980. 🇺🇸 

Trying to be a smartass, but stating the truth. FDR was a complete douchebag and a socialist to the hilt. Almost every policy that he advocated for and got passed by Congress was socialist in nature. He was the ultimate big government bureaucrat who didn't do anything but increase the size and reach of government. It took us years to roll back some of those taxes, but sadly, most of his programs are ingrained into our governmental fabric now.

[Guardian]

There is a lot out there that FDR and the government full of his ideals caused the depression to last longer and wasn’t followed by a big recovery.

And you are race bating by equating someone saying that socialism is bad or social policies aren’t good are equated to something that everyone agrees is bad, racism.

Dude. That’s really really sick how terrible and racist your comment is negatory. Seriously, sit down and consider your equations and analogies when you revert to equating to racism. That’s really bad.

[Sim]

1 hour ago, slackline said:

He literally only posts propaganda.

Please seek medical attention. 

[Guardian]

Stop just saying socialism with no context when you just don’t like a policy. 

Context.....do you understand what you are saying?

[Waves]

Hah, literally the exact same thing right back atcha buddy.

[Negatory]

1 hour ago, Guardian said:

 

There is a lot out there that FDR and the government full of his ideals caused the depression to last longer and wasn’t followed by a big recovery.

 

I’d be interested to read more about this if you have sources.