Jump to content

C-17 Down on Elmendorf


uhhello

Recommended Posts

  • 9 months later...

Tony's comments spark a lot of thought. I don't know the pulse of AMC anymore, but does this article shed light on current/recent buffoonery?

AMC does not have a pulse, yes this article has a lot to do with our recent buffoonery, and thank you for cleaning up some of that buffoonery. Fly safe tomorrow... Oh, and just because you have to fly a jet with holes in it across the country, gear down, unpressurized, does not mean I am buying you a fucking beer next time you are in town.

OK, I will buy you 2 beers and I will let you drive the boat.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

AMC does not have a pulse, yes this article has a lot to do with our recent buffoonery, and thank you for cleaning up some of that buffoonery. Fly safe tomorrow... Oh, and just because you have to fly a jet with holes in it across the country, gear down, unpressurized, does not mean I am buying you a ######ing beer next time you are in town.

OK, I will buy you 2 beers and I will let you drive the boat.

Friggin deal! See you Jun 17-21.

Not to shit on his remembrance, but my understanding is that EM charts do not exist for AMC aircraft, that true?

What's an EM chart?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's an EM chart?

Thought so. In case you're serious or for those that don't know, a chart that details sustainable angle of bank, turn rate/radius for a given airspeed along with specific excess energy lines denoting climb or descent rates when under or over performing the aircraft. It's the end result of Boyd's energy maneuverability studies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thought so. In case you're serious or for those that don't know, a chart that details sustainable angle of bank, turn rate/radius for a given airspeed along with specific excess energy lines denoting climb or descent rates when under or over performing the aircraft. It's the end result of Boyd's energy maneuverability studies.

Thought I remembered that from somewhere... I forgot my best Beavis voice doesn't propagate into message boards. I still don't care... Mostly because I have 800 engineers telling me what I can't do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thought so. In case you're serious or for those that don't know, a chart that details sustainable angle of bank, turn rate/radius for a given airspeed along with specific excess energy lines denoting climb or descent rates when under or over performing the aircraft. It's the end result of Boyd's energy maneuverability studies.

That's what Betty does, in the HUD you get speed and roll bars based on everything you mentioned, that show you where the stall regions are and as for pitch if you attempt to pitch to put the plane into a stall she'll only let you get so far and then kick to "AOA limiter System" mode which will override your pitch up command and gradually lower the nose to regain airspeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

busdriver,

Yes - there are EM charts in the Dash-1, but more specifically in the FCF T.O. The AFTTP also has some limited numbers.

Knowing the EM charts cold would not have prevented this....recognizing and recovering from the stall indications as taught in UPT would have saved the day. Unfortunately, that communitty (I was a former member) was - up to that point - auto tuned to disregard many of the WACS/CAWS messages as "routine." in addition, per the report, flying the prescribed airshow demo profile which limited to 60 AOB would also have been nice...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All of that and the dude was still able to over perform the aircraft and HAL didn't save the day? Seems to me knowing before hand would have been better.

Yes, he did the one thing the designers never thought someone would do.. change configuration (retracted slats) while low and slow in a high AOB turn. HAL was bitching the entire time, but the crew had become desensitized to the warnings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

During a C-17 Airshow Demo profile is not the best time to declare yourself a test pilot, which is what he essentially did. He was a really good pilot with a great reputation in the community (certainly no Bud Holland as he is often wrongfully compared to), but he should have known better. Not to mention the fact that the several pilots who flew with him NEVER should have let him get away with it. What sucks is that it most likely would have been prevented if just one of those guys (not just the ones killed on that crew) had just said during one of his briefings, "Hey Bro, we don't ever fly the jet like that... why would we do that now?" Knowing the kind of pilot he was I'm betting he may have tried to explain why it was OK, but in the end would probably say, "Yeah, you're probably right." Unfortunately his name and reputation for the most part will always be associated with this crash (and I'd say that a good 90% of this is laid correctly at his feet) and we'll never know why he thought it was OK to fly the jet like he did, but those who were his friends and Squadron mates knew him as a great pilot, a great Dad and a great friend.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thought so. In case you're serious or for those that don't know, a chart that details sustainable angle of bank, turn rate/radius for a given airspeed along with specific excess energy specific excess power lines denoting climb or descent rates when under or over performing the aircraft. It's the end result of Boyd's energy maneuverability studies.

Picking at nits

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Picking at nits

My only point was if he planned a XX degree angle of bank, he should have also had a required airspeed to meet prior to starting that turn. If that had been done, there never would have been a stall to recover from or at least figured out how much airspeed bleed would be required to maintain that AOB below the sustainable airspeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...