SurelySerious
-
Posts
2,906 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
46
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Blogs
Downloads
Wiki
Everything posted by SurelySerious
-
-
Translation: doesn’t know what Russia’s objective is, and would like an authoritarian dictator to be successful in taking whatever he wants.
-
You get a BTF, and you get a BTF, and you get a BTF! If only we had a structure in place to adjudicate global force management and allocation…properly
-
I don’t remember it being a competitor for the Armed Overwatch RFP, honestly. Could be wrong, there were 8 iterations of this program in some shape or form between AFSOC and SOCOM.
-
FIFY
-
Shocking that you can’t theoretically just pick up a whole wing of the nuclear enterprise and deploy it with no consequences.
-
Should have taken the Frank Costanza approach, “Hunter we've had it with you. Understand? We love you like a son, but even parents have limits.” Guess nepotism is in, baby!
-
Air Force is hiring for civilian T-6 IPs
SurelySerious replied to Arkbird's topic in General Discussion
Based on the current trend…Biff is only 6-9 years early on his satire becoming reality. -
I would buy an economic argument or one from a hobbyist that wants to charge from their own solar panels as real arguments for it.
-
Tesla, a Darling of Clean Energy, Has a Pollution Problem: https://www.wsj.com/business/autos/elon-musk-tesla-environment-1263cd60?st=8NTdpG&reflink=article_copyURL_share Oops! Their website didn’t factor that in when it advertised how green the car is, last I checked.
-
Air Force is hiring for civilian T-6 IPs
SurelySerious replied to Arkbird's topic in General Discussion
What’s $69k/flight hour amongst friends? -
You’re not, though ( you just say random things that are tangential to whatever you are trying to espouse), and just because you only see one path to victory doesn’t mean another doesn’t exist. You want to argue you are on Washington/Jefferson side? Articulate it between 500-690 words. Coherent sentences only.
-
https://www.pewpewtactical.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/One-Ping-Only-Hunt-For-Red-October.gif
-
Aggressive Russian assassinations across Europe since 2000 which were definitely justified by NATO’s existence, and not because a former KGB member, Soviet state dreamer came into power: http:// https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2024-11-22/putin-s-assassination-targets-revealed-in-declassified-memo
-
You fly when it’s cloudy?
-
Translation: Bashi was totally wrong and can’t admit it. Double down!
-
Yeah, your assumption that russia was healed and everything was kumbaya and they were ready to join the west and that all the soviet influence was gone is incredibly, INCREDIBLY, flawed. Hence the aristocracy moving Putin into power to help restore Soviet glory. You’re real selective about your “facts.”
-
I don’t know if you’ve noticed, but Putin is the Soviets. They never went away.
-
This is how we know you’re delusional in a basement somewhere. Collective defense against Russia is the main reason NATO exists. Having them join would be inviting the fox to guard the henhouse; they would be able to obstruct anything they want, just like they do on the UN Security Council. Do you get paid for this nonsense?
-
Let’s be honest, you’ve worked with the European partners: they are not capable of the coordination required to integrate forces between countries in a timely or effective manner for a collective defense. Therefore, their inability to maintain stability in that region then impacts us when trade/travel/etc are degraded due to countries taking advantage of other smaller countries. It’s the overall premise of our umbrella of deterrence, and you’re smart enough to know it.
-
One can only support a nation in duress if they are obligated by a treaty: the opinion of a simpleton troll. Glad you’re not an officer and just an online Putin simp.
-
Yep, although it did lead to one of the great satires of all time:
-
uKrAiNe IsNt NaTo Your only line, and I’m the simpleton. No, I read the history, that’s how I know there was no aggression justifying an invasion of a sovereign nation.
-
Your “interpretation” of “history” is the mentally deficient part. There were no hostilities, and then someone initiated hostilities…who started shooting and taking another country’s land? Oh, right. It was Putin.
-
Indeed, it was totally unnecessary for Putin to invade a nation unprovoked.
