VMFA187

Every MD in California was sent a notification that stated they could lose their certification by the California Medical Board stating that they would potentially lose their license if they provided documentation for any waiver for the vaccine that was outside of the realm of "a demonstrated allergic reaction to ingredients in the vaccine." Several studies have shown, for specific segments of the population, the risks outweigh the benefits. For those who have epilepsy, 4% who received a vaccine experienced more frequent or more severe seizure activity. If you were in that population would you think you should be granted a medical exemption? Legitimate question.

They can't - The far left take his word as gospel and only the far left continue to feel that Biden is doing a satisfactory job. If this administration fired him they would lose their most ardent supporters while gaining very little from the rest of the population who feel that this administration is failing. Who would have bought into that slogan? I know a fair amount of people and only one has been hospitalized from covid - I wouldn't be willing to "social distance for a few years" from what I've seen. With that said, I know that some here have experienced loss and for that I do sympathize. But I would not and will not give up years of my life to provide a larger margin of safety for those who have already chosen to condemn themselves by way of their years of poor decision-making as it relates to diet and healthy lifestyles. They made their bed, they can sleep in it. Don't expect others to subsidize your poor past decisions.

Press Briefing by White House COVID-19 Response Team and Public Health Officials | The White House "We are intent on not letting Omicron disrupt work and school for the vaccinated. You’ve done the right thing, and we will get through this. For the unvaccinated, you’re looking at a winter of severe illness and death for yourselves, your families, and the hospitals you may soon overwhelm."

Hey Pawnman and everyone else, look! You can get "super immunity" if you are fully vaccinated AND get covid after! COVID vaccination and previous infection may deliver 'super immunity' (usatoday.com) Wonder if uber leftists are going to throw covid parties after they are fully vaccinated so they can catch covid and then claim their moral superiority through their super immunity. 😆

Finished it on the ride to work this morning. @pawnman, riding doesn't = flying.

Says a dude on who has never flown a military aircraft posting on a military aviation site. 😆

Hear and read what you want. Don't think this decision doesn't weigh heavily on my mind. I'm not the only one in this position.

I hope you one day have to face a choice between ensuring your family is taken care of or jeopardizing them for something you feel is right.

That people are trying to get a booster before they are even eligible for it, yes.

Great, that should be a choice that they themselves are able to make for an illness that has a mortality rate that is incredibly low for a relatively healthy individual when the alternative is a vaccine that doesn't function like a vaccine, and has absolutely no long-term known side effects, and that skipped many of the normal vaccine testing requirements to receive authorization.

Well, I was coerced into receiving the JJ vaccine on Thursday around 2pm. I woke up 10 hours later and felt like absolute garbage, as bad as when I had covid two months ago - Fever, worst muscle soreness I've ever experienced (truthfully), headache, and joint pain. Lasted until a few hours ago. Can't wait to see what long term side effects will be revealed in the coming years... At least I'll have about a year head's up on most of the willing test volunteers. Of note, there were people in there who were a week from even being eligible for a booster asking if they could get it early. Astounding.

The Maxwell Trial Tracker on on Twitter was just suspended.

I hope your lead brought you in for a straight in to ILS or PAR... If it warrants a legit section penetration to section landing it warrants an emergency declaration. If he's leading a hurt bird on a Hi-TCN triple arcing procedure then he's AFU. Tell your flight leads to suck less.

Call them effective if you want, but they're not required for a vast majority of the population and their use puts that majority at risk for other factors they wouldn't have to face if not being coerced to take a "vaccine" that they don't need. There are a lot of other "effective tools in the quiver" but no one is pushing those - Why?

Why was the definition just changed? Isn't that odd? Are you cool with changing the definitions of words just to fit a certain viewpoints narrative? Seems you are and that it's just "semantics."

Except its not, at least the way Webster's dictionary defined the word "vaccine" until a week or so ago. I guess its a valid to change the definitions of words so they meet your intent. The left has been doing it for years for social justice, why not this?

Only scared libs are even wearing masks anymore in San Diego. Of course they are also wearing them in their car, alone...

Got it. Thanks dude.

We did it in the Hornet in the RAG/FTU and fleet to show that you could bring back another aircraft through bad weather that didn't have the ability to ability to navigate or fly safely on its own due to aircraft malfunctions like a failed INS/GPS or lack of airspeed indications due to failed sensors. I had to bring back a Hornet for a section landing once due to the latter.

THIS vaccine. I don't care about the technology behind it. No knowledge of future complications exist because of the rush to get it to market. If you are comfortable with that, cool - Take it and be happy. Why do you feel compelled to force others to have to take it? I believe in gun ownership but I'm not forcing everyone to have one in their home.

That's how long a typical vaccine takes to get past the requirements to be deemed safe for use.

10 years of research, like any other vaccine. And transparency - Release those documents that they want 55 years to review before it is released to the public.

1. So it is harmful? Thank you. And you can make that statement only if peanut butter had just been invented less than a year ago and people were "unexplainably" having adverse reactions and. Peanut butter has been around for quite some time so we know there are no long-term adverse effects. 2. Not an answer to my question. By how much does it have to lower your odds to actually be a "vaccine?" 3. Not an answer to my question. Thanks for only answering one of my questions and side-stepping the others. "Alot" and "tiny" are also very useful numbers. Appreciate the thoughtful response. /sarcasm I have received the flu vaccine twice in the four years since I've departed active duty. It is well-established. I'll wear your down votes as a badge of honor from here on out!

Am I not understanding this correctly? I was just browsing the 2022 tax brackets and found it terrible that in the 35% and 37% bracket married couples are taxed far more harshly than those who are single. Bracket / Single / Married Filing Jointly 35% $215,950 to $539,900 $431,900 to $647,850 37% $539,900 or more $647,850 or more So two people who live together and share a life together, but are not married can make $1,079,7999 together and not enter the 37% tax bracket. Yet at $647,850 a married couple enters the 37% tax bracket? Is that correct? What does that say about this administration and the democratic party? Any thoughts on why this is happening?

@pawnman, you gave me a minus for this statement. Does the vaccine have side effects that we know about that are harmful? Does it prevent people from catching covid? Does it prevent people from spreading covid? Answer those questions and then tell me why you think that statement is deserving of a down vote.