The Next President is...

[gearhog]

28 minutes ago, slackline said:

Saying a city has more violence, crime, homelessness and racial injustice because it is democratically led is a false correlation.  Simply not accurate, but it's easy to draw that false correlation because most people won't look beyond the surface. From the article:

"Is it reasonable to connect the violence and partisanship?

In short, no.

“I don’t think there’s any data that would allow us to draw a causal conclusion here,” said David Weisburd, executive director of the Center for Evidence Based Crime Policy at George Mason University. “Somehow arguing that Democrats cause crime or something of that sort just doesn’t fit the history of crime prevention in the U.S.” 

If you interpret the claim as referring to Democratic leadership, Weisburd notes that President Bill Clinton had one of the strongest recent administrations in terms of funding the criminal justice system.

But more broadly, linking crime and votes simply doesn’t reflect how crime works. Studies have repeatedly found that urban crime is not a widespread phenomenon — like voting is — but a product of small groups of people in small areas."

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/06/24/fact-check-linking-city-violence-democratic-politics-reach/3248102001/ 

 

Isn't it more likely that urban areas have more of these problems because they have more people?  Every single one of these problems could be due to that fact alone.

Can you quote where I mentioned anything about crime and violence?

You're fabricating a position, attributing it to me, and creating an argument against it just so you can feel like you won a debate.

Retarded.

 

 

[Seadogs]

6 minutes ago, M2 said:

Honestly, I can't understand why any side wouldn't want to ensure the election was as fair as possible!

Biden is missing out on a perfect opportunity to demonstrate his integrity by joining the call to look at possible irregularities in the voting.   

I don't know if anyone else is followed this, but last month the SSC Tuatara hypercar set a new Guinness world-record speed of 316.11 mph, making it the fastest production car in the world.  However, several individuals noted discrepancies in the online video of the run, so this is how the owner of SSC--Jarod Shelby (no relation to Carroll Shelby)--responded...

 This, gentlemen, is how you handle controversy! 

He is talking about cars. We are talking about in entire country's election process which doesn't need to be analyzed. Apples to oranges. /s

[slackline]

1 minute ago, Guardian said:

So a place that is governed by ideals leaning more towards one set of ideals doesn’t have results that relate directly back to those ideals?

So if a terrible set of parents raises terrible kids, it’s not their fault and doesn’t have any correlations?

I’m just having a tough time following your argument.

Apples to Oranges comparison.  The effect of a parent far outreaches the effect of say, a mayor or city council, on a population.  100% disingenuous way to ignore the point that is being made in my post.  My point is that this is a way to complex thing to simply say democrats run things, that's why they're jacked up.  There are plenty of instances where there was/is a Republican person in charge in some urban area, and things didn't magically get better.  It's easier for the right to say, "oh look, Democrats are in control of that area, and they have problems."  It's not that simple.  

 

5 minutes ago, M2 said:

Honestly, I can't understand why any side wouldn't want to ensure the election was as fair as possible!

Biden is missing out on a perfect opportunity to demonstrate his integrity by joining the call to look at possible irregularities in the voting.   

I don't know if anyone else is followed this, but last month the SSC Tuatara hypercar set a new Guinness world-record speed of 316.11 mph, making it the fastest production car in the world.  However, several individuals noted discrepancies in the online video of the run, so this is how the owner of SSC--Jarod Shelby (no relation to Carroll Shelby)--responded...

 This, gentlemen, is how you handle controversy! 

Agreed.  Isn't that what Biden is doing?  Has he once said to stop counting?  Honest question.  I don't think there's anything wrong with him proceeding as if he won while this plays out in the courts.  I don't think you can equate him saying "Trump isn't doing his legacy any favors" to "I won, stop counting, it's over."

 

Also, that car is uhhhmazing!  Saw that when it came out, super cool!

[slackline]

6 minutes ago, Seadogs said:

He is talking about cars. We are talking about in entire country's election process which doesn't need to be analyzed. Apples to oranges. /s

Dude, he's backing you.  You missed his point entirely...

 

ETA: I didn't know what /s meant.  Seadogs was entirely on top of it!  mea culpa

Edited November 12, 2020 by slackline

[Seadogs]

1 minute ago, slackline said:

Dude, he's backing you.  You missed his point entirely...

Do you know what the symbol /s stands for? 

[gearhog]

Just now, slackline said:

Dude, he's backing you.  You missed his point entirely...

Not only is his sarcasm glaringly obvious, he ended his statement with "/s".

 

[slackline]

5 minutes ago, torqued said:

Can you quote where I mentioned anything about crime and violence?

You're fabricating a position, attributing it to me, and creating an argument against it just so you can feel like you won a debate.

Retarded.

 

 

You're right.  My bad.  I read the homelessness, racial injustice, etc. and my brain automatically included crime and violence because that mantra comes from the right so often.  My point stands even about homelessness and your other points.  

My apologies for falsely attributing the crime and violence thing to you.  Relax...  I am posting nothing to "feel" like I won a debate.  This is the internet.  That aint happening...

[slackline]

3 minutes ago, Seadogs said:

Do you know what the symbol /s stands for? 

Haha, no I didn't.  My bad.Thanks for pointing it out.  

 

ETA: went back in and clarified that I am an internet newb I guess.

Edited November 12, 2020 by slackline

[Seadogs]

I really hate linking Fox. Gritting my teeth posting this. 

 

 

[Homestar]

1 hour ago, Seadogs said:

He is talking about cars. We are talking about in entire country's election process which doesn't need to be analyzed. Apples to oranges. /s

Did his competitor spend months laying the seeds of doubt about the upcoming test so that they could, on test day, cry that the test was fouled up?

If similar irregularities occurred in 2016 are you saying that we should have re-run that election too?  Or is 2020 the first time we've ever had vote irregularities?

How far are you willing to go to see Trump installed as President on January 20th?

Jeez I really wish some Air Force general would get courtmartialed so we can finally argue about something worthwhile.....

https://www.airforcetimes.com/news/your-air-force/2020/11/10/fired-two-star-research-lab-commander-charged-with-sexual-assault/

 

[DosXX]

1 hour ago, M2 said:

Honestly, I can't understand why any side wouldn't want to ensure the election was as fair as possible!

Biden is missing out on a perfect opportunity to demonstrate his integrity by joining the call to look at possible irregularities in the voting.   

Agreed, and I think most people want that. Video was great, and a calm and rational look at the voting process through the court system should absolutely be welcomed, but that's not what we're getting.The president is not only using the court system to handle claims of irregularities, he is going on Twitter and claiming with certainty that fraud has happened in the hundreds of thousands. I will agree Biden should absolutely welcome all legitimate legal challenges to exemplify integrity, but will you also agree that the president needs to stop actively undermining the democratic process by convincing millions the election will never be valid by saying things like this? 

https://www.nationalreview.com/the-morning-jolt/a-careful-voter-fraud-review/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

A great article on the current state of fraud from a leading conservative publisher (unless you think OAN is the only valid disseminator of conservative thought left) which also addresses the 254 pages of affidavits. 

Edited November 12, 2020 by DosXX
Added tweet

[Seadogs]

11 minutes ago, DosXX said:

Agreed, and I think most people want that. Video was great, and a calm and rational look at the voting process through the court system should absolutely be welcomed, but that's not what we're getting.The president is not only using the court system to handle claims of irregularities, he is going on Twitter and claiming with certainty that fraud has happened in the hundreds of thousands. I will agree Biden should absolutely welcome all legitimate legal challenges to exemplify integrity, but will you also agree that the president needs to stop actively undermining the democratic process by convincing millions the election will never be valid by saying things like this? 

https://www.nationalreview.com/the-morning-jolt/a-careful-voter-fraud-review/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

A great article on the current state of fraud from a leading conservative publisher (unless you think OAN is the only valid disseminator of conservative thought left) which also addresses the 254 pages of affidavits. 

Why can't he say that?

[Seadogs]

18 minutes ago, Homestar said:

Did his competitor spend months laying the seeds of doubt about the upcoming test so that they could, on test day, cry that the test was fouled up?

If similar irregularities occurred in 2016 are you saying that we should have re-run that election too?  Or is 2020 the first time we've ever had vote irregularities?

How far are you willing to go to see Trump installed as President on January 20th?

Jeez I really wish some Air Force general would get courtmartialed so we can finally argue about something worthwhile.....

https://www.airforcetimes.com/news/your-air-force/2020/11/10/fired-two-star-research-lab-commander-charged-with-sexual-assault/

 

Biden and the legacy trash media did. Saying Trump will steal the election.

 

No irregularities in 2016 for Clinton to go to the courts with.

 

You are only seeking and hearing what you want to see and hear. I can't help you with that bud. 

[Seadogs]

Step one for Trump. 

 

https://www.post-gazette.com/news/crime-courts/2020/11/12/trump-campaign-election-2020-presidential-pennsylvania-lawsuit-ballots-late-identification/stories/202011120132

[Homestar]

12 minutes ago, Seadogs said:

Biden and the legacy trash media did. Saying Trump will steal the election.

 

No irregularities in 2016 for Clinton to go to the courts with.

 

You are only seeking and hearing what you want to see and hear. I can't help you with that bud. 

Thanks guy. 

[DosXX]

4 minutes ago, Seadogs said:

Why can't he say that?

He can say what he wants, and Biden can choose not to say whatever he wants too. M2 took the liberty to suggest what Biden should do, and I am doing the same for Trump. It's creating millions of cynical citizens who will deny court decisions on this for something and has already been discredited. You can do it yourself if you have some programming knowledge.

Here is the source of data and script:

https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O2wesk/happening-calling-every-pede-to-/

The "stolen votes" were a rounding error since the percentages were scraped to the first decimal place.  So if the true count was 49.94% the script read it as 49.9%. For a million votes that's 40,000 votes, and across multiple updates in multiple states you get to the 2.7 million number. And of course, if you do this yourself with the file you will find just as many Trump round off errors as Biden ones.

[DosXX]

1 minute ago, torqued said:

Why did the President say this? Is he making it up?

It fits his narrative.

2 minutes ago, torqued said:

The nerd writes a script that combs through the entirety of the data and finds the code embedded in the voting system that either switches Trump votes to Biden or throws them out altogether.

It's NOT code from the voting system, it's code web scraped straight from the NYT page. That is absolutely an important distinction to make. He says so himself on what I linked.

2 minutes ago, torqued said:

Now this data will need to be verified by an independent unbiased third party, but there's enough evidence to warrant further review.

I welcome it, my worry is when they come to the conclusion us nerds have nobody is going to believe it was bs because of what the President is saying so conclusively. 

[Guardian]

Regardless of the outcome going through this process is good. The justice dept and system looking into this is good. It will absolutely help strengthen the voting system for the future and it gives credibility to the process of investigations. This, regardless of who wins, is a very good thing.

Side note, see that PA court system ruled for trump and against the PA Secretary of State for overstepping her bounds?

[gearhog]

13 minutes ago, DosXX said:

It fits his narrative.

It's NOT code from the voting system, it's code web scraped straight from the NYT page. That is absolutely an important distinction to make. He says so himself on what I linked.

I welcome it, my worry is when they come to the conclusion us nerds have nobody is going to believe it was bs because of what the President is saying so conclusively. 

Looks like I posted the link to the page right after you. We’ll see what the results are. 
 

Why is the most straightforward explanation, in existence, of what’s currently happening coming from this guy? 
 

 

[Guardian]

Wow!!!!! JP rocked it!

[slackline]

Looks like I posted the link to the page right after you. We’ll see what the results are. 
 
Why is the most straightforward explanation, in existence, of what’s currently happening coming from this guy? 
 
 

He makes some good points. I find it odd how all the fault lies on one side of this equation. The fact that the sitting president has been encouraging people to believe the system will be cheated for months, sorry, years, is completely ignored. Had he give that fact some air time as well, he’d be much more credible.

He’s not wrong though, Joe Biden is nothing as of right now. He’s not legally elected to anything. He should still be preparing for that potential eventuality.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[Prozac]

28 minutes ago, Guardian said:

Regardless of the outcome going through this process is good. The justice dept and system looking into this is good. It will absolutely help strengthen the voting system for the future and it gives credibility to the process of investigations. This, regardless of who wins, is a very good thing.

Side note, see that PA court system ruled for trump and against the PA Secretary of State for overstepping her bounds?

You may be underestimating how low this whole thing is likely to go. Let’s assume that Trump expends all of his legal options and the results overwhelmingly fail to support his claims of fraud (This seems likely based on legal results thus far...you may disagree, but bear with me). What happens then? Do you think Trump is going to tell his supporters “well guys, the American legal system has had its say and we must have faith in that system.”? Hell no he’s not. He’ll leave the White House kicking and screaming and spend the next four years convincing a large percentage of Americans that every aspect of our government, including the legal system is beholden to the liberal deep state and they will come to the conclusion that the only answer is to burn the whole thing down. Do you think that’s a good path for our country? Because that is absolutely the path we’re on as long as this guy continues to be enabled by the party he co-opted. 

[Seadogs]

3 minutes ago, Prozac said:

You may be underestimating how low this whole thing is likely to go. Let’s assume that Trump expends all of his legal options and the results overwhelmingly fail to support his claims of fraud (This seems likely based on legal results thus far...you may disagree, but bear with me). What happens then? Do you think Trump is going to tell his supporters “well guys, the American legal system has had its say and we must have faith in that system.”? Hell no he’s not. He’ll leave the White House kicking and screaming and spend the next four years convincing a large percentage of Americans that every aspect of our government, including the legal system is beholden to the liberal deep state and they will come to the conclusion that the only answer is to burn the whole thing down. Do you think that’s a good path for our country? Because that is absolutely the path we’re on as long as this guy continues to be enabled by the party he co-opted. 

You haven't given any evidence as to why 72 million Americans and myself shouldn't believe that the system is broken.

 

Riots with no punishment.

Mass mail in ballots (ie. switching the rules at the last minute)

Kung flu lockdowns without supporting evidence

Critical race theory

Orange man bad

 

You think this shit 24/7 for 4 straight years was a good thing for our country? This is how one half feels. You can't completely ignore that and only go off of "orange man bad and evil". 

[slackline]

You haven't given any evidence as to why 72 million Americans and myself shouldn't believe that the system is broken.
 
Riots with no punishment.
Mass mail in ballots (ie. switching the rules at the last minute)
Kung flu lockdowns without supporting evidence
Critical race theory
Orange man bad
 
You think this shit 24/7 for 4 straight years was a good thing for our country? This is how one half feels. You can't completely ignore that and only go off of "orange man bad and evil". 

How about every election up until now as evidence that the system isn’t broken. The burden of proof is on those claiming it is. You can say it is all you want. I have faith it is not, and hopefully that will be evidenced in a few weeks when this is all done with one of the two worst presidential candidates in the history of the US as the President Elect.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[Seadogs]

1 minute ago, slackline said:

How about every election up until now as evidence that the system isn’t broken. The burden of proof is on those claiming it is. You can say it is all you want. I have faith it is not, and hopefully that will be evidenced in a few weeks when this is all done with one of the two worst presidential candidates in the history of the US as the President Elect.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Why does everyone here keep saying "burden of proof is on us"? We know it is. We keep giving you evidence. Sworn affidavits. Thousands of them. Votes in MI being switched, and there is only evidence of that happening to benefit Biden. This election is fishy and millions agree with me.