Jump to content

SurelySerious

Supreme User
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,534

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    43

 Content Type 

Everything posted by SurelySerious

  1. SurelySerious
    Is your point that it's the same amount of time because it's still a 1:2 ratio?
  2. SurelySerious
    He's not trying to get promoted.
  3. SurelySerious
    Cruel and unusual timing. $2.5M, loss of down.
  4. SurelySerious
  5. SurelySerious
    Even a fast mover has to seriously crazy ivan a predictive 54 to not be within the seeker, but I suppose they're always looking for perfect.
  6. SurelySerious
    Wait, I thought alternate duty location was what the mission suppression group did every Thursday afternoon when they close up shop and go to the bowling alley. No?
  7. SurelySerious
  8. SurelySerious
    So like SAM command guidance, just opposite direction. The cost of the weapon itself has a potential for being lower than a gbu-12 or 54, but since we already have massive infrastructure for laser designators, the cost of figuring out how to equip the launch platform is probably making it not any less expensive overall.
  9. SurelySerious
    And then we'll put that special operations in the most special part of America.
  10. SurelySerious
    I'm aware, purely commentary on AFGSC's general inability to adapt to anything.
  11. SurelySerious
    The fact that stone age AFGSC is ahead of another MAJCOM in something is unbelievable.
  12. SurelySerious
    From the History Friday thread because I can't figure out how to link to a post in mobile. From the man himself. https://www.flyingsquadron.com/forums/index.php?/topic/11649-History-Friday/page__view__findpost__p__422070
  13. SurelySerious
    DaughterSon? Some new gender thing, probably.
  14. SurelySerious
  15. SurelySerious
    I file that under bullshit, instability, and bad leadership mostly.
  16. SurelySerious
  17. SurelySerious
  18. SurelySerious
    Calling whatever we're doing a "strategy" is generous.
  19. SurelySerious
    In that case, we can annex Vancouver or build some fake Islands near Curaçao and no one will do anything about it. Fight's on! Kidding.
  20. SurelySerious
    Combination. At the time, the USMC was looking for a Harrier replacement, and pretty much based on the political/budget environment when the JSF was in its infancy, they figured the only way to get one was to latch on.
  21. SurelySerious
    Apparently part of their reprimand was to remove all copies of it. Seems reasonable given the scope and nature of Al Gore's interwebs. /s Although, maybe the man won in this case.
  22. SurelySerious
    Checkmate.
  23. SurelySerious
    Your data on SCAR is misinterpreted. It is exactly for localized control of a full F2T2EA process emphasizing decentralized execution in low to medium threat environments. Final attack control isn't part of the SCAR responsibilities because it isn't needed in an environment where close proximity to FF and detailed integration don't exist. All you need is someone doing task/employment/airspace deconfliction. So for air interdiction of emerging target sets where you don't need the detailed integration for friendly forces, the SCAR will have authority to issue Investigate/Target/Smack tasks. If the JFC/JFACC actually delegate the authority as intended. The ALSA MTTP has a lot more specifics.
  24. SurelySerious
    Or how about we innovate and find a better way to do things instead of using a system that doesn't fit the current ops environment?
  25. SurelySerious

    Gun Talk

    SurelySerious replied to VL-16's topic in Squadron Bar

    Standard "leadership" TTP of not answering the question that was asked whatsoever, nice.
×
×
  • Create New...