Sua Sponte

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/08/united-airlines-staff-granted-religious-exemptions-to-vaccine-mandate-will-be-put-on-unpaid-leave.html

He’s a C-5/KC-135 guy. He sucked at flying both. My favorite story was his wife getting drunk one night and posting on the Squadron Facebook page what a small dick he had and how he couldn’t give her kids. It was deleted within a few minutes. When he was the ARS Sq/CC he was punishing people for frat and I informed some friends of mine in his Sq how his wife was an Airman when he met her as an Lt. Rules for thee, not for me.

Friend of mine is a reserve boom (-135s now -46) and flies for a regional as a pilot. It was a ton of money and hard work, but he loves it.

He’s one of the worst pilots and FGOs I’ve ever been stationed with/flown with.

Any truth in this? https://americascivilwarrising.org/27-u-s-air-force-pilots-resign-over-covid-19-vaccination-mandate-marines-not-far-behind/

Regardless of whomever represents him if he does go to a court martial best believe they’re telling him right now to STFU and stop making social media posts and statements.

If there’s legal proceedings happening, he cannot be compelled to talk to a mental health provider (only show up to his appointment). Any of their notes can be subpoenaed by the government and if he goes to a court martial will make the military judge conduct an in camera review to see if parts are releasable. If he doesn’t say anything, those records don’t exist.

He was fired for the Minot Buff flying nukes incident. Robert Gates mentions it in his book “Duty.”

This dude is viewing “Q Drops” on 8Chan as he posts.

Sounds like AFSOC has AMC Managerialship problems. “Rules for thee, not for me.”

Wow!

I was stationed at Altus when the -17 FTU Sq/CC crushed a -135 ice shield with a SOC student. The instructor boom was Q-3d and the -135 FTU Sq/CC said he’d pull the Q-3 of the safety report came back and exonerated the instructor boom. The safety report came back and said the instructor boom wasn’t at fault, it was the -17 Sq/CC’s fault for climbing into the tanker during the breakaway. The -135 FTU Sq/CC went to remove the Q-3 and the OG/CC, a -17 driver, told him that he would put a Q-3 Form 8 with his name on it if the original one was removed. How do I know? I was in Stan Eval at the time and begrudgingly typed up the original Q-3 for the -135 Sq/CC to sign, fully knowing this was political bullshit. Nothing surprises me about the idiots that run the MAF.

RUMMIT is the C-17 Loadmasters on that RCH flight are being Q-3d for “Improper Floor Loading.”

Calculating that Form F, if they even did one without massively WAGing it, makes me nervous just thinking about it.

Might as well switch to Navy Fed for banking. I did four years ago from USAA and Navy Fed is what USAA was 15+ years ago in terms of customer service.

You mean the one that conveniently left out how the President can waive informed consent case law? https://sites.duke.edu/lawfire/2021/02/18/can-troops-be-ordered-to-take-the-covid-vaccine-a-guest-post-analyzes-the-law/

Didn’t know Marge Three Names posted on here?

I don’t think ClearedHot was in the “vulnerable demographic” either when he almost died from it.

https://biotech.law.lsu.edu/cases/vaccines/U_S_ v_ Washington.htm "As the Supreme Court has emphasized, "[t]he essence of military service 'is the subordination of the desires and interests of the individual to the needs of the service.'" Goldman v. Weinberger, 475 U.S. 503, 507 (1986)(quoting Orloff v. Willoughby, 345 U.S. 83, 92 (1953))." "The requirement to place the needs of the nation above a servicemember's personal welfare applies in peacetime as well as in war. "[I]t is the primary business of armies and navies to fight or be ready to fight should the occasion arise." United States v. ex rel. Toth v. Quarles, 350 U.S. 11, 17 (1955)."

Found your vaccination card.

Ad hominem attacks are usually a great way to make sure the argument you’re making is solid.