Sua Sponte

Stop rewarding social activism in the military. If that isn't done, then the service academies will continue down this wokeness path. Oh yeah, the dipshit former Macdill Wg/CC who wrote that "Dear White Colonels" article is at USAFA, figures.

He's 2-4 against ranked teams in bowl games, 1-3 against Michigan, 0-3 against SEC teams, and 1-6 against Top 5 teams. In case you didn't know, college and pro football are results-based professions. If you don't produce positive results, then they'll find someone who can.

I have also seen the same thing happen via a board of inquiry. However, said BOIs were assembled due to a court-martial or NJP while at said senior rank. If the dipshit who was the 19 AF/CC is acquitted of the serious charges in his GCM, but found guilty of the minor infractions, he won't be retiring a two-star. However, I've seen that the odds of a BOI being assembled only go up depending on how public the accusations become.

Damn, fired to be retired in a rank that most officers never reach. Thoughts and prayers.

Ryan Day probably should find new work.

Chip Kelly has an interesting idea of how to structure CFB.

Bro of mine I went to BIQ with in the -135 was in the 9th before going to the -135 (Ray).

As someone with a masters in cybersecurity from a T-25 school, go into cybsercurity policy if you do that. There's a big shift into having AI do more of the blue-collar cybersecurity stuff.

What years were you in the 9th?

The question I have is how can a former president be disqualified via the Insurrection Clause if said person was acquitted by the Senate during an impeachment trial charged with “Inciting an Insurrection?”

With NIL and the portal you’re going to start seeing players transfer at halftime.

It’s going to cause a “trigger effect” like the repeal of Row with some red states. If the SCOTUS agrees with the CO Supreme Court, Trump’s 2024 campaign is done due to all blue states disqualifying him (subject to their state’s election laws) via the insurrection clause. If the SCOTUS disagrees, then he won’t have to be worried about being disqualified in any state over the insurrection clause.

“However not convincing.” Well, no one cares if it’s convincing to you (or anyone else other than a superior court). You would agree with me that a commander at the military level is an officer, correct? Is the president not the “Commander-in-Chief?”

So, the CO GOP couldn’t put another candidate on the ballot because Trump was disqualified via CO election laws? If Arizona, Wisconsin, or any state wanted to disqualify a candidate base on their state election laws, that’s well within their right to do so. If done, which is what happened here, then it’ll be appealed to the SCOTUS for an interpretation against the Constitution. The CO Supreme Court issued a stay for their decision until 4 Jan for Trump’s attorneys to file an appeal to the SCOTUS, which they’ll do. It’s a Constitutional interpretation that’s never happened before with the 14th Amendment, the CO Supreme Court just set it up. It was also a 5-4 opinion, so it wasn’t without dissent within the court.

Who said we don’t want to participate in an election? The CO Supreme Court just held to disqualify a candidate via our state election laws.

You doing think someone that swears in via the Oath of Office isn’t some type of officer? Their analysis on the topic starts on PDF Pg. 70 to 89. https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2023/23SA300.pdf

He was charged with “incitement of insurrection” during his second impeachment, which he was acquitted of. He’s literally receiving due process by being able to appeal to higher level courts. The interesting focus I believe the SCOTUS look at is can one be disqualified via the Insurrection Clause of the 14th Amendment after being acquitted either in a criminal trial or impeachment trial? The clause just has “engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof” and doesn’t say “convicted of insurrection.” However, to me, that’s foolish to disqualify someone due to something when they had due process via a jury of their peers or the Senate and acquitted of it.

He’s still on the ballot if he appeals to the SCOTUS (which he’ll do) before 4 Jan 24.

No, he is.

What a fucking idiot. Hopefully, his line number disappears and he can go cry into retirement. https://www.dailysignal.com/2023/11/02/he-sees-all-white-people-as-racist-military-assessment-critiques-air-force-colonels-leadership/

Pretty straightforward. https://www.tsp.gov/publications/tspfs05.pdf

By "struggling" do you mean by not having big double-digit wins against ranked opponents like Oregon, Oregon State, and Utah? I guess? They beat ranked opponents Oregon twice, USC, Utah, and Oregon State. Florida State dominated LSU, beat Louisville by nine points, and beat Clemson, the only ranked opponents they've played. Florida State's strength of schedule is 55th while Washington's is 11th and Alabama's 5th. Florida State almost blew a 21-point lead on Boston College, needed overtime against Clemson, and trailed at home in the second half to Duke before Riley Leonard exited with an injury. Texas also beat Alabama. Alabama beat the reigning two-year champion, Georgia. Ultimately, the committee wasn't going to let Alabama, who just beat the #1 team in the SEC Championship, or an undefeated Washington team who beat a Top 10 Oregon twice to include the PAC-10 Championship, sit at home and give it to an ACC team who played weaker opponents. Why? Too much money left on the table and the people didn't want to see an FSU team just boat-raced by a stronger SEC, Big 12, PAC-10, or Big 10 team.,

They sure did, then got boat raced by Georgia. I’m not saying it’s right, because it’s not, but do you believe if FSU made it to the natty, they’d be competitive against any of the other three teams?

You can blame TCU’s ass whipping in the Natty last year on why FSU was left out this year.