1 hour ago, Polar Bear said:

You don’t think I can find a picture of someone shitting on the sidewalk in any city in Texas?

Nope. Do it.

1 hour ago, Polar Bear said:

Just because it happens in SF, doesn’t mean it happens everywhere in CA.

What's the magic number? 4? Because I've been to 4 different CA cities and witnessed the horror show with my own eyes. None were SF.

Edited May 19May 19 by FourFans

46 minutes ago, HeloDude said:

I wonder why California has such a high number of homeless per capita…one of the highest in the country.

The weather and insane social benefits like free dental care for illegals.

Spencer Pratt is making waves and his commercials are funny as hell!

Another airline guy checking in here and honestly the only thing that makes an overnight suck is if it’s too short. I hate getting into a cool vibrant city getting put up in the airport hotel. Time for my 6900th shitty hotel burger and fries..

After staying in pretty much every major city in the country multiple times I can confidently say they’re all great. They all also have their rough parts. Use common sense and avoid the rough parts. If you can’t find a way to have a good time on an overnight in LA or SF with some of the best food and bar scenes in the country idk if you can be helped. It’s not that scary guys avoid skid row and the tenderloin and enjoy the rest of these massive awesome diverse cities.

On the subject of bodily functions I’ve seen more bachelorette puke on the sidewalks of broadway, 6th, and bourbon than I have human shits in all liberal cities combined. By a factor of ten. Go have a good time and stop letting Fox News convince you these places are scary

1 hour ago, HeloDude said:

I wonder why California has such a high number of homeless per capita…one of the highest in the country.

Military, weather, social programs.

Edited May 19May 19 by Polar Bear

STILL counting ballots from a primary three days later...what a failure.

Given how close the race appears to be, I'm not surprised. It's a detailed thing to make sure the democrat wins by a small enough margin to make it look like there wasn't too much meddling. At least in the Gov race.

Edited Saturday at 02:26 PM4 days by FourFans

It's already over though. Not like any of those votes will flip to Pratt even if he ends up getting the primary nod.

Seems to be some deja vu here

The state with Silicon Valley and they can't count votes in a reasonable period of time.

I routinely RON in California, and have seen the degradation in multiple cities first hand over the past 5 years, but is this kind of election process that takes a MONTH to complete normal anywhere else? A month to count ballots seems like a ripe breeding ground for fraud to go undetected.
https://dp.electionresults.sos.ca.gov/

SEVEN days and still counting...what an abomination.

This failed stateis beyond corrupt and it is on full display during this election . On June 1st Newsome signed an SB 73 which was "emergency legislation to protect the election".

For the record SB73 restricts access to voter information, prohibits giving law enforcement agents, including federal officials such as ICE and Border Patrol agents, access to voter rolls  or voting systems without a court order. Why in the world would you need to keep those roles in the dark....hmmm.

SB73 does some other shady shite like limiting challenges to Mail-in Ballots by prohibiting election observers from making challenges on the basis that the signature on a return envelope does not match the one that appears in the voters’ registration records. Great time to pass this legislation given the swing in results away from Spencer Pratt is the result of Mail-in Ballots from three districts with a VERY high homeless population, those votes broke for 5:1 Raman.

Thousands of homeless voters were registered to vote at LA shelters — despite many not living there or the facilities not having any beds. It was revealed that one drop-in center that received $600,000 from the socialist candidate had 185 registered voters at the address but offers NO accommodations. Last week, the New York Post contacted the Nithya Raman's campaign and the center seeking comment regarding the relationship between the councilmember and the organization but has not heard back. However, a photograph showing Raman presenting a check was taken down from its website following our inquiries.

The largest concentration of homeless voters was at the Midnight Mission in Skid Row, where voting records show 1,160 registrations — but its website shows it only has beds for 84 men and 36 women.

The swing away from Spencer Pratt was perfectly predictable and in no way indicative of systemic fraud.

In person voting typically skews right and mail in voting typically skews left because (shocker) the only people who have time to go spend all day standing in line to vote on a weekday are the retirees.

This artificially inflated Pratt’s lead but it was never going to hold. Or are we saying LA just magically became republican all of the sudden, and this is proof of some conspiracy?? Most of the voters in the state vote by mail and the vast majority of those people are democrats. Period.

And on the subject of the homeless voter registration conspiracy.. there are 43,000 total homeless people in LA. Spencer Pratt lost to Raman by ~30,000. So either the Raman campaign managed to round up and register 75% of the homeless in LA to vote for her… or it’s just a liberal city where the people voted for the liberal

Yeah....nothing to see here.

Skid Row (not the band) is what happens when nobody takes care of the drug and homeless problem. They have kicked the can so far that entire city blocks are shanty towns. It's a real bummer.