Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 minutes ago, Sua Sponte said:

The USAF would’ve had to redesigned the 767-200 empanage, which it couldn’t afford. Also, the aft part narrows and there’s two pallet positions that would’ve been lost. This has less to do either the cameras and more to do with the boom flight control system (FLCS) when the receiver is too far low and in while in contact. 

Perfect.  Yeah i'm not saying the boom pod setup had anything to do with the latest mishap, just more why the fuck they did it in the first place.  Thanks.

Posted (edited)
27 minutes ago, uhhello said:

Perfect.  Yeah i'm not saying the boom pod setup had anything to do with the latest mishap, just more why the fuck they did it in the first place.  Thanks.

Copy, no worries. This is the fifth time this scenario has happened that I know of. Japan had this scenario happen 1-2 times with their -46s as well.

Edited by Sua Sponte
Posted
3 hours ago, Sua Sponte said:

Copy, no worries. This is the fifth time this scenario has happened that I know of. Japan had this scenario happen 1-2 times with their -46s as well.

Doesn't japan also have KC-767s? Do they also use cameras or are they the old reliable boom pod? 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Arkbird said:

Doesn't japan also have KC-767s? Do they also use cameras or are they the old reliable boom pod? 

Japan and Italy both got rid of their KC-767s and replaced them with the KC-46 (Italy calls the KC-46 the KC-767B for political reasons). The KC-767 used a window. The Dutch KDC-10s that Omega purchased used a camera system (dunno if Omega retrofitted the cameras with newer ones or used the window).

Edited by Sua Sponte
Posted
On 7/18/2025 at 12:37 AM, Sua Sponte said:

Japan and Italy both got rid of their KC-767s and replaced them with the KC-46 (Italy calls the KC-46 the KC-767B for political reasons). The KC-767 used a window. The Dutch KDC-10s that Omega purchased used a camera system (dunno if Omega retrofitted the cameras with newer ones or used the window).

The KC-767 does not have a window/boom pod.

JASDF KC-767J:
maxresdefault.jpg

 

Italian KC-767A:
150902-F-EU155-035.jpg

Posted
17 minutes ago, StoleIt said:

The KC-767 does not have a window/boom pod.

JASDF KC-767J:
maxresdefault.jpg

 

Italian KC-767A:
150902-F-EU155-035.jpg

What's with the goggles?

They get two AC vents? Spoiled rotten.

There's an unconfirmed story about a U model gunship coming home in the unicorn configuration.

Posted
4 minutes ago, arg said:

There's an unconfirmed story about a U model gunship coming home in the unicorn configuration.

They need to change the 46 from Pegasus to Unicorn.  

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, StoleIt said:

The KC-767 does not have a window/boom pod.

JASDF KC-767J:
maxresdefault.jpg

 

Italian KC-767A:
150902-F-EU155-035.jpg

That's right, for some reason I thought they had paid to put a window in the back.

Posted
1 hour ago, arg said:

What's with the goggles?

They get two AC vents? Spoiled rotten.

There's an unconfirmed story about a U model gunship coming home in the unicorn configuration.

3D Goggles. The KC-46 boom operators use glasses that look like sunglasses for the same thing. 

  • Like 1
Posted
7 hours ago, StoleIt said:

The KC-767 does not have a window/boom pod.

JASDF KC-767J:
maxresdefault.jpg

 

Italian KC-767A:
150902-F-EU155-035.jpg

Yeah, but I've heard the JSDAF's booms are smaller and easier to get into the hole.

  • Haha 4
Posted
1 hour ago, FourFans said:

Yeah, but I've heard the JSDAF's booms are smaller and easier to get into the hole.

That's what she said

Posted

From my understanding, a lot of the USAF’s issues with the KC-46 come from their program requirements they pushed to Boeing…the KC-767s have not (publicly at least) shared these issues. 

Posted
9 hours ago, Clayton Bigsby said:

From my understanding, a lot of the USAF’s issues with the KC-46 come from their program requirements they pushed to Boeing…the KC-767s have not (publicly at least) shared these issues. 

Billions of cargo ton-miles flown by 767s every year.  OTS systems and parts just lying all around.

AF: yeah we want to redesign the tracks and rails.

Just cannot get out of their own way.

Posted
14 hours ago, FourFans said:

Yeah, but I've heard the JSDAF's booms are smaller and easier to get into the hole.

That's racist!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...