MKopack Posted October 14, 2011 Share Posted October 14, 2011 Uganda, South Sudan, the Central African Republic and Congo. I'll bet that's a fun deployment... I'm sure that there's a strategic political "big picture" reason that this makes sense, but somehow I see more "bad things" than "good things" coming from this. U.S. sends troops to Uganda to help fight Lord's Resistance Army REPORTING FROM WASHINGTON AND JOHANNESBURG, SOUTH AFRICA -- President Obama is deploying about 100 special operations troops to Africa to help target the leadership of the Lord’s Resistance Army, a notorious rebel group that has been entrenched in a stalemate with the government of Uganda for more than two decades. In a letter notifying Congress on Friday, Obama said the first small team of U.S. “combat-equipped” advisors arrived in Uganda on Wednesday. Over the next month, the remaining U.S. troops will be sent to surrounding countries, including South Sudan, the Central African Republic and Congo. The goal of the U.S. mission is to assist regional African forces in removing Lord’s Resistance Army leader Joseph Kony and other commanders of the group “from the battlefield,” the letter says. On the good side though: Bet that's some good stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vertigo Posted October 14, 2011 Share Posted October 14, 2011 There's a collective facepalm going on over at the Nobel prize selection committee. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rokke Posted October 14, 2011 Share Posted October 14, 2011 I'm sure that there's a strategic political "big picture" reason that this makes sense... According to our CiC... "I have directed this deployment, which is in the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States, pursuant to my constitutional authority to conduct US foreign relations and as commander-in-chief and chief executive." So I guess the strategic political "big picture" is that the LRA in Uganda is a threat to our national security. I found this quote about them on Wikipedia (so it must be true...) ""the LRA remains one of the least understood rebel movements in the world, and its ideology, as far as it has one, is difficult to understand." That actually makes them very similar to the Occupy Wall Street movement. Probably time to deploy SEAL team 6 to Wall Street. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nsplayr Posted October 15, 2011 Share Posted October 15, 2011 SOF guys going around the planet killing people who are assholes...man, who knew... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BitteEinBit Posted October 15, 2011 Share Posted October 15, 2011 Ah yes, the beginning of "even more with less"...Good luck gents...we're all counting on you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pawnman Posted October 15, 2011 Share Posted October 15, 2011 So...when does Code Pink start protesting Obama for starting new wars? I mean, they didn't even wait until the invasion of Iraq to start protesting Bush. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PapaJu Posted October 15, 2011 Share Posted October 15, 2011 They know we've had military in Africa doing things that don't make the front page of the NY Times for some time now, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooter Posted October 16, 2011 Share Posted October 16, 2011 I think USAFRICOM is starting to get its legs under it so I would expect more of this in the near future...probably a lot more. Cooter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest CAVEMAN Posted October 16, 2011 Share Posted October 16, 2011 Terrorism in Africa is real. There has been about 4 bombings in Nigeria in the last year or so and this is considered one of the stable countries in the Western Region(parts of the country practice Sharia Law by the way). The attacks are believed to be the hands of a new breed of terrorist in Africa. The US fears the alliance of this African breed of terrorist with Al Qaeda which could make a volatile scenario in the continent we least understand. The whole Mogadishu thing still scares people even till today but we need to step-in early enough and now is the time. There is more on SIPR for those remotely interested. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrndPndr Posted October 16, 2011 Share Posted October 16, 2011 We should keep sending Spec Ops into every shithole country we perceive a threat in until the whole world loves us. "2" Or, loves Obama. Let's make a list! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tac airlifter Posted October 16, 2011 Share Posted October 16, 2011 Terrorism in Africa is real. There has been about 4 bombings in Nigeria in the last year or so and this is considered one of the stable countries in the Western Region(parts of the country practice Sharia Law by the way). The attacks are believed to be the hands of a new breed of terrorist in Africa. The US fears the alliance of this African breed of terrorist with Al Qaeda which could make a volatile scenario in the continent we least understand. The whole Mogadishu thing still scares people even till today but we need to step-in early enough and now is the time. There is more on SIPR for those remotely interested. Terrorism is real in several places, but western africa is not at the top of our list. Nigeria I see the possible connection, but Uganda? It's a waste of resources. Additionally, the group specifically named is the LRA; they practice a mystic brand of animism & christianity. Not at all in danger of linking w/ AQAP and certainly no threat to the US. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Learjetter Posted October 16, 2011 Share Posted October 16, 2011 There's oil in South Sudan and Uganda--perhaps enough for us to let go of the Saudi teat...which means....see you boyz there! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Royal Posted October 16, 2011 Share Posted October 16, 2011 We should keep sending Spec Ops into every shithole country we perceive a threat in until the whole world loves us. To include, but not limited to, every U.S. city that has an "Occupy Wall Street" style gathering. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nsplayr Posted October 16, 2011 Share Posted October 16, 2011 (edited) Terrorism is real in several places, but western africa is not at the top of our list. Nigeria I see the possible connection, but Uganda? It's a waste of resources. Additionally, the group specifically named is the LRA; they practice a mystic brand of animism & christianity. Not at all in danger of linking w/ AQAP and certainly no threat to the US. What?? Nigeria is sort of in western Africa, where terrorism is a problem, and the LRA operates in Uganda South Sudan & CAR, all of which are in central and eastern Africa, where terrorism is also a problem...which of these is unimportant again? Does the LRAs non-Islamic ideology somehow make them any less terrorist-y than other groups? Edited October 16, 2011 by nsplayr 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThreeHoler Posted October 16, 2011 Share Posted October 16, 2011 He's saying that since their ideology doesn't link up that they're not likely to work together. Something about radical Christianity and radical Islam being like oil and water... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nsplayr Posted October 16, 2011 Share Posted October 16, 2011 Yea, that checks, but what I'm asking is that does that make them any less dangerous? Does that make them any less deserving of an ass kicking? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tac airlifter Posted October 16, 2011 Share Posted October 16, 2011 (edited) What?? Nigeria is sort of in western Africa, where terrorism is a problem, and the LRA operates in Uganda South Sudan & CAR, all of which are in central and eastern Africa, where terrorism is also a problem...which of these is unimportant again? Does the LRAs non-Islamic ideology somehow make them any less terrorist-y than other groups? Copy, Nigeria is sort of western Africa. Hence "Nigeria I see a possible connection." As for the LRA, the group specifically named in and around Uganda-- there's no connection to AQAP, and I'm qualified to make that statement. And since we're no longer in a "global war on terrorism" per POTUS direction, it seems odd to me we'd start some shit with a terrorist group which has never been a threat to us. If we're going to get into a brawl with every terrorist group out there just for being terrorist assholes (which I'm fine with BTW) then let's continue the Bush policy and I'll call it the GWOT again. If you think they are a threat or may be in the future ergo they should be struck now, then by all means let's have POTUS explain why we should implement preemptive war and I'll bask in the irony. If we want to focus our limited resources on the threat, lets go kill al shabab in Somalia and finish off AQAP/AQEA... you know I'm game. I'm all for killing people bad guys simply because they're bad, once we can afford to divert our resources and attention away from dudes actually trying to kill my wife and kids. Edited October 16, 2011 by tac airlifter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nsplayr Posted October 17, 2011 Share Posted October 17, 2011 (edited) AQAP wasn't he point of sending troops here since they, ya know, operate on a different continent. AQEA is obviously a threat we have on our radar, but apparently the LRA is worthy of it's own group of dudes to hunt them down. To me, this pretty much falls into the same category as SF dudes helping out with the fight against the FARC, our efforts in the Philippines, etc. There are a bunch of groups out there that aren't exactly knocking at our door but that still threaten our interests. And if you think the GWOT is over, come on man, that change was made for political reasons and we all know it. I don't think there's any doubt about the current administrations intentions WRT counterterrorism ops in various sunny locales around the globe. Edited October 17, 2011 by nsplayr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tac airlifter Posted October 17, 2011 Share Posted October 17, 2011 (edited) AQAP wasn't he point of sending troops here since they, ya know, operate on a different continent. You're smarter than this response indicates. I know AQAP wasn't the point of sending troops to Uganda. My point exactly. We should be utilizing scant resources to win fights with enemies intent on doing us harm before we start some shit with a random group indifferent to our national interests. apparently the LRA is worthy of it's own group of dudes to hunt them down. Apparently that isn't apparent to me, hence the disagreeing nature of my response. To me, this pretty much falls into the same category as SF dudes helping out with the fight against the FARC, our efforts in the Philippines, etc. There are a bunch of groups out there that aren't exactly knocking at our door but that still threaten our interests. Copy, although the PI ops are in fact happening ISO fighting an AQ offshoot so not the best example. If the LRA in Uganda is threatening our interests, please explain how. And if you think the GWOT is over, come on man, that change was made for political reasons and we all know it. You got me there. I saw an opportunity to point out the absurdity of the GWOT--> OCO name change and took it. Nothing has changed except the acronym on my OPR. You can support POTUS policies while still joining in my amusement at the irony of our Nobel Peace prize winning CINC who ran on a "change" platform who has, in fact, changed nothing but the name of our wars. Edited October 17, 2011 by tac airlifter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nsplayr Posted October 17, 2011 Share Posted October 17, 2011 (edited) You're smarter than this response indicates. I know AQAP wasn't the point of sending troops to Uganda. My point exactly. We should be utilizing scant resources to win fights with enemies intent on doing us harm before we start some shit with a random group indifferent to our national interests. I don't think we're lacking resources to fight AQAP. Personal opinion only. Copy, although the PI ops are in fact happening ISO fighting an AQ offshoot so not the best example. If the LRA in Uganda is threatening our interests, please explain how. I wouldn't say an offshoot of AQ but linked for sure. You're right, not the best example, but then again that have been numerous people asking me randomly why the U.S. military is in the Philippines so to Jon Q., he doesn't now the difference or why we're there either. WRT to the LRA, from what I understand it's somewhat of a help to Uganda since they committed a contingent of their troops to Somalia to fight al Shabbab, where we're loathe to put boots on the ground for obvious reasons. Worthy of ~100 armed advisers apparently. You got me there. I saw an opportunity to point out the absurdity of the GWOT--> OCO name change and took it. Nothing has changed except the acronym on my OPR. You can support POTUS policies while still joining in my amusement at the irony of our Nobel Peace prize winning CINC who ran on a "change" platform who has, in fact, changed nothing but the name of our wars. Dude, I'm on board with that...the Nobel guys are seriously regretting their stupid decision. Obama has been all for kicking peoples asses whether it's in Libya, Pakistan, Yemen, etc. and apparently Uganda/South Sudan/CAR is next on the list. Peace through superior firepower I guess... Edited October 17, 2011 by nsplayr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tac airlifter Posted October 17, 2011 Share Posted October 17, 2011 I don't think we're lacking resources to fight AQAP. Personal opinion only. There are a finite number of people available and they are burned out, this further tasks them. Personal opinion only. Worthy of ~100 armed advisers apparently. Still not apparent to me. And the "100" number is a bit misleading since a minimum of x5 that number are going for support and logistics. All of which comes from somewhere else. And since we're all maxed on hours and doing 1:1 dwell, to plus up here we subtract somewhere else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nsplayr Posted October 17, 2011 Share Posted October 17, 2011 ...to plus up here we subtract somewhere else. Afghanistan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tac airlifter Posted October 17, 2011 Share Posted October 17, 2011 Afghanistan. Yes, that's what will happen; resources/people will be diverted from OEF for CAR et al. So it would be reasonable to expect the LRA is a bigger national security threat than the HQ/AQ networks our special dudes are fighting there. Except they aren't. So again, why are we diverting resources from a higher priority threat? It's really rhetorical at this point and I copy you're in favor of it. But to me it doesn't make sense, I want to kill the dudes plotting to attack my family before I get my war on elsewhere. I'll let the reader decide, chow hall just opened so I'm out. Later man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nsplayr Posted October 17, 2011 Share Posted October 17, 2011 (edited) I wouldn't say I'm necessarily for it...hell, it just got announced. I guess I am for taking the fight to a variety of enemies and Africa is the next playground so count me in. We've spent enough time in A-stan killing the same groups of assholes only for their sons to take their fathers' places in the ranks of dudes who hate America. In the wise words of Sean Carter, on to the next one. Have fun out there man. Edited October 22, 2011 by nsplayr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Day Man Posted October 17, 2011 Share Posted October 17, 2011 In the wise words of Sean Carter, on to the next one. Actually, it's Swizz Beatz who says that. Sean Carter is the one who has a bunch of problems, but a bitch ain't one. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now