brabus

What we’re doing with Iran is reckless and without plan? 0% truth in that line you’re pedaling. That’s my point.

Well it hasn’t, so there’s no missed prediction as of time now. Always subject to change of course.

It must be exhausting to be such a miserable person so full of rage. Go have a few beers and relax a bit.

Beyond acceptable societal norms, his greatest failure with this string of rhetoric is the threat can only work if the regime cares about the survival of the people at large. Like all totalitarian regimes, they don’t give a shit about the country as a whole, civilians, etc. The only language they speak is violence against what directly affects them and their ability to wield power.

pK miss. I gave the succinct, accurate answer that can be written on an Internet forum. You have no clue what’s actually going on, but by all means, continue to run your mouth and make an ass out of yourself.

Take away (or at least reduce to max extent feasible) Iran’s ability to project any kind of influence, power, and/or destruction outside of their own borders.

@disgruntledemployee First, you put words in my mouth that I didn’t say. There are several things to be frustrated with on the tactical and operational level. That said, there is no war or great achievement without frustrations. So, yeah, there are actually sensible and good objectives with plans and contingencies addressed. Also, it was never all going to get done in 2-3 weeks. That was a dumb timeline from the beginning, but that doesn’t mean we barged in without a plan or zero thought put towards contingencies, off-ramps, etc. Bottom line: it’s a lot better than the MSM and you would like it to be. The red line for me would be mass ground invasion for longterm “nation building” (aka the last 25 years). I don’t support that one bit, and would view it as a leadership failure.

Summation of the last page: several people with not a lot of actual SA acting like they’ve got it all figured out. Par for the course I guess.

Nobody is rolling dice. There is inherent high risk in MCO and what is required to achieve intent/objectives - shouldn’t be a shock to anyone.

I hope they win tens of millions and never have to work another day in their life.

ROE, risk tolerance, intent…all different than anything we’ve seen since the 90s. So that’s why you end up seeing something like this come out on the internet.

This ain’t that war, not even close.

I’m really sick of bullshit like this. There’s needs to be a change in how we do business - you’re a lawmaker who makes this law, SCOTUS rejects it on obvious unconstitutional grounds, then you as legislator should pay a price…financial, immediate termination, I don’t know…but something.

Depends on the priorities and risk assessment - sometimes it makes sense.