Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 07/03/2014 in Posts

  1. So you're saying 3 people found a way out.
    7 points
  2. What you said: What I read: I'm butthurt that i got my AAD before this policy came out and I subscribe to the blanket policy that you should get an AAD regardless of its usefulness or cost to the taxpayers and your family. Wow. Believe it or not, and as vexing as you may consider it, there are officers who have been successful and promoted without an AAD. And transferred their gi bill to their kids. And lived happily ever after.
    4 points
  3. We trust you with aircraft, we trust you with weapons, we trust you with the nations secrets, but I can't trust you to manage a six pack of Budweiser. Thats clearly beyond your pay grade.
    1 point
  4. Saw this and was surprised it wasn't already here. You can check out the full article, but the money quote has to be in the last paragraph. I believe there was a problem with the flow of information in that career field, but I don't think that "commander down" was the direction that they had trouble with.
    1 point
  5. Good straw man argument Bender.
    1 point
  6. What you wrote: What I read: Personally, I love to go to Rome or Barcelona - if only the Air Force would send me. I refuse to waste my family's time, my time and taxpayer money doing something that I full well know will further my career and support my family for no other reason than to further my career and continue supporting my family. I feel like doing less work is more important than making sure the career I have is secure, again, the one I use to support my family. The funny part is, although I could take the opportunity to work really hard and do something worthwhile, I'm just going to pass on it now and waste my kid's education benefits that I chose not to give them (they'd have just wasted the opportunity anyways.)
    1 point
  7. When General Welsh made "Blues Mondays" optional it seemed to happen almost instantaneously - optional master's degrees? Not so much. The bureaucrats will not accept this new status quo lying on their back. The people who already completed their master's degree feel they "deserve" to be rewarded for drinking the Kool-Aid. All of our current Air Force managers have their master's degrees complete so why should the next generation be exempt from such a ludicrous requirement? Personally, I'd love to get a master's degree in something relevant or useful - if only the Air Force would send me. I refuse to waste my family's time, my time, and the tax payer's money (TA) on a degree that serves no purpose other than checking a box. I know it will hurt my career and may even get me RIF'ed but so be it. I feel that sticking to my guns about what is right is more important than looking out for my own career. The ironic part of this whole mess is that if I get RIF'ed I'll likely go to school full time and complete a master's degree. My advice - if you're not going to play their game, have a backup plan ready.
    1 point
  8. That image is ass-about-face: the thing is burning money (intake), not creating it (exhaust).
    1 point
  9. Being charged with a DUI is not the same as being convicted of a DUI. If they parade you up in front of everyone in service dress it creates the impression that you are in fact guilty and could sway the potential jury members that are on that base. I'm sure a smart lawyer could bring this up at the trial, if it was on base, as unlawful command influence.
    1 point
  10. You obviously don't know crap about gunships or the A Code. The ACW is a work in progress...as we've seen on the battlefield. The HUD will change some of that and the J will be a completely different as well. All things being equal CSO, I'd rather have the gas.
    1 point
  11. First post.... Navs - we appreciate your contribution ACs - everyone still respects your authoritah Isn't this thread supposed to be about masters degrees?
    1 point
  12. This is something else that is wrong with the Air Force. The fact that all comm was renamed "cyber" and that most "cyber" Airmen have no idea what is actually happening in the cyber ops world. Cyber ops (offensive and defensive network warfare) should be an ops AFSC (17D) and called cyber, because it is an actual domain that is contested and can be used kinetically i.e. "supported." This AFSC should be filled with smart people. Base comm and all of the other comm functions that have zero to do with cyber ops should be a support AFSC (33S) and called comm i.e. "supporting." This AFSC can be stocked with anybody. They also need to move Cyber Command out of AFSPC and make it its own MAJCOM. It is far too important to be a NAF in a MAJCOM that operates in a completely separate domain.
    1 point
  13. Maybe if the clubs had decent food and service, and were remotely fun to hang out at, then they wouldn't be in the red and the WG/CC wouldn't be trying to figure out how to keep it open.
    1 point
  14. This looks like a scam....what kind of crystal ball shit are they selling you?
    1 point
  15. I assumed you meant one of these: You can see how much time you have left to fly, and study threats that may sneak up behind you.
    1 point
  16. That's what I thought initially too. Then I finally decided to ignore all the stupid ads and give it a try. Then I started making a lot of money. The SIA is the flagship newsletter and it's only about 100$ per year. There's some pretty insightful shit in there.
    -1 points
  17. Porter usually puts 1 or 2 stock recommendations in his monthly newsletter. He's a diehard contrarian and usually does a pretty good job of finding assets with potential in beaten down sectors. His team also has some rock solid options trading strategies which I've started using, took my options trading to a whole new level. His strategy is writing naked puts though, so you'll usually need at least 25k in a margin account that allows you to make such trades. USAA is terrible BTW. His latest recommendation is long NRB and short TSLA, but overall he is very bearish now. I understand the bull run of the last 5 years has been generating significant returns, but there are still good plays out there and still some room to run, but it's probably time to start sprinkling some downside protection around your portfolio. In the end, I used to think that going at it on my own was all I needed. I suffered some gains and some losses but finally figured I might as well give something else a try. It's virtually impossible to accomplish the level of research that Porter's team accomplishes on your own. Overall I think it's worth the money. I'm not a paid advertiser, I'm trying to offer genuine suggestions to guys to help them out with their finances because, believe it or not, I really care about the guys I work with (Military in general) and I would like to see them succeed. It's not a panacea and it comes with no guarantees, but it might help to provide some additional information/options. PM me if you want and I'll be happy to send you a copy of his latest newsletter.
    -1 points
  18. If you are an AC "working your crew like finger puppets", you obviously don't understand what a crew aircraft is all about, and god help the people who have to fly with you.
    -1 points
×
×
  • Create New...