All Activity
- Past hour
-
Kid Rock "Fly By" - Hegseth Steps in - "Carry on Patriots"
Collin Raye - That's My Story (Official Video)
- Today
-
Kid Rock "Fly By" - Hegseth Steps in - "Carry on Patriots"
Hey Boss, I was just getting some hover and terrain masking practice in. I was just as surprised as WO2 Bagonuts to see some redneck standing there giving me a salute.
- WTF? (**NSFW**)
-
Kid Rock "Fly By" - Hegseth Steps in - "Carry on Patriots"
-
Kid Rock "Fly By" - Hegseth Steps in - "Carry on Patriots"
Maybe I missed it, thought this would have been posted. Hegseth steps in: Pete Hegseth Swiftly Lifts Suspension of Pilots Who Flew by Kid Rock’s House: ‘Carry on, Patriots’ I hope this doesn't turn into a slippery slope. I know a T-38 pilot at Edwards is currently facing an FEB for flying over his house at 200' and doing an aileron roll over the town.
- The Iran thread
- WTF? (**NSFW**)
-
The Iran thread
In a word, no. That EO, and the whole series it's part of, don't restrict the DOD. They restrict the intelligence community. Nothing stops the military from targeting a head of state - or literally anyone else - if they are declared a legal target / combatant. Not sure where this whole "the military can't kill certain people" idea has come from. Probably news organizations like CNN, NBC, ABC, et al who just clip one-liners from EOs and use them to promote narratives which support their own motives.
- Yesterday
- WTF? (**NSFW**)
- WTF? (**NSFW**)
- WTF? (**NSFW**)
- WTF? (**NSFW**)
-
The Iran thread
No surprise. Maybe some coalition building was needed before pickling missiles. Oh wait, we got a 747. Saulgoodman. Maybe Trump tells em to get in the game or he takes out the power grid, then the neighbors can deal with a medieval times failed state. Meanwhile he's angry with other long term allies, like UK, for not wanting to participate. That should have been part of the decision process as they gamed this out, art of the deal and all. My guess is, as long as its just us and Isreal, this thing will drag on. If the whole ME piles on and starts to beat the shit out of the bully, white flags might pop up. Or not, zealots and all. Break I received one of those texts to a survey. The questions were slanted towards support of current actions for Israel's sake. Not 1 question on nuclear threats. Lastly, I pondered an interesting item. EO12333 against assassination. Should the EO have kept us from participating in bombing the Supreme Leader/staff? Not that any rule, order, or law keeps Trump in check, and I have done 0 research, but just wondering out loud.
- WTF? (**NSFW**)
- The Iran thread
- The Iran thread
-
Concept aircraft
Vaporware of F-35 EX and EG concepts My druthers, go with the double delta with integrated intakes
-
Latest update on missing AF General
https://amgreatness.com/2026/03/30/something-dark-is-going-on-nine-top-level-scientists-die-or-go-missing-in-past-year/
-
Gun Talk
It does, but you no longer have to pay the $200!
-
The Next President is...
Epically funny and scary at the same time, a glimpse of what the current DNC wants to bring to America. My first thought when some of them spoke was "this can't be real"....but it is! Lectured on how they hold their "equity card"...this is the modern Democratic Party.
- The Iran thread
- The Iran thread
-
Dos Gringos is back!
- The Iran thread
Respect. I have no issue with people asking questions as Americans or whatever. Nor do I have a problem with contrarian opinions so long as they're defended in good faith. If I had my way, Ron Paul would be the President and a lot of other things about the way we conduct ourselves in the world would be different. So as a philosophical matter I agree that in the best of all possible worlds, Congress would not have abdicated its war-making responsibility, and we'd have a functioning government. At some point in my career, though, I looked at the way things actually worked, and began to come to terms with the imperfect way things work. That doesn't make it right, but it does make it above my pay grade. What I would put to you or anyone else out there is the question you seemed to be asking was an important one, but one we as officers don't get to deal with. It's the distinction between jus in bello vs jus ad bellum. We have every right and responsibility to question jus in bello. Questioning jus ad bellum is outside our lane as military officers. We benefit from being and having critical thinkers in the military. I pointed out what I thought was an inconsistency in the approach to the argument and what my thoughts are. Cheers.- Last week
- Gun Talk
So, does a Javelin fall under AOW or Destructive Device under the NFA? Need that tax stamp! - The Iran thread