SurelySerious
-
Posts
2,905 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
46
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Blogs
Downloads
Wiki
Everything posted by SurelySerious
-
Thought they pushed that shit back to 2021 or 2022 or something. Whatever.
-
Yeah, I’d have to go with it’s the easiest weight-saving way to do it if you’re an engineer trying to stay under requirements who won’t have it exploding next to his cranium.
-
Well developed in the sense that it works to make a car go around the track, but since it’s all narrow street circuits with relatively wide cars not very entertaining at all. Marbula E, though? Gold.
-
For sure.
-
Sure, Jan.
-
The onus is on those making such a hypothesis to prove it. Stop acting like this is a religion based solely on belief.
-
I read a bunch and know a decent amount about computer modeling; it’s how I’m skeptical of pinning everything on humans in the US with models trained on poor data while simultaneously giving a pass to China and India. Airplanes are pretty real; man-made global warming is an unprovable theory. You don’t have a control system to contrast against, and the current computer models are all recognizing humans as the cause because they’re incredibly limited. But you’re an arrogant troll only interested in your religion so no, this won’t matter. Edit: also, you should read the rational optimist by Matthew Ridley. Every time someone makes some grim global prediction, it works out. Stop freaking out and live your life.
-
You don’t tow lines, you toe them; the hubris that humans are the only thing causing this and we understand it so certainly that it must be true is indeed antithetical to science. Check yourself.
-
Copy, there are heretics, agnostics, and atheists at odds with your religion.
-
Present evidence, not correlation based on models trained from data based only on industrial humans. You've presented no science whatsoever, just an emotional diatribe. That's not science.
-
You know how when you train facial recognition AI with only people of one race, it can only detect reliably the people of that same race? All of these climate models developed off of limited data have the same problem; it’s trained off of high fidelity data from only a period with industrial humans. The historical data back to 800,000 years is highly based off of assumptions...that fit one hypothesis. You’re not using science, you’re practicing religion.
-
It did make him an expert at skirting the constitution by trying to use executive powers only on a bunch of things, somehow gambling his party would never be out of power. Short term strategy, just like all the poor AF leaders. Also made him an expert at using emotions to convince people climate correlation is the same thing as causation. Lots of people on board with that one.
-
Could be.
-
I think the story of the debate is Joe got the same spray tan as Donnie.
-
Derail inbound: https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/09/25/want-to-learn-how-the-pentagon-works-then-play-this-board-game/ This is probably a more useful education on national strategy than PME curricula.
-
Pressing to test on that physical network thing on extended TDY. Hopefully VPN is enough.
-
No, you shrink the federal district so you don’t have to make a new state.
-
So you don’t think our government is representative of the populous? Interesting, go with data.
-
No, the risk has been accepted at the top.
-
Don’t think he was looking at the small picture of just enlisted sim IPs.
-
Brutal! They could have at least kept him at KRND.
-
Somehow Grosjean keeps getting hired. I’d take Perez/Mag over him for sure.
-
Two
-
If you’re a journalist, don’t editorialize your opinion in the news reporting. There’s an Op-Ed section for this specific distinction.
-
Present facts without your opinion. That’s what I want.
