Sua Sponte

If Trump wins the “Southern Route,” Pennsylvania is even more key. But much like your map I don’t see him winning Arizona, and I’m 50/50 if he’ll win Georgia or Florida, which if Biden wins one of the five “Southern Route” states, Trump is screwed. But we all know a state could flip at the last second. I think Florida is going to be just as contested as 2000 and that the SCOTUS is going to see another version Bush v. Gore.

The interesting point is you questioning people on this forum’s service because they don’t share the same political opinion as you. Or how military members/veterans are supposed to support Trump, you know, the guy who skirted service himself due to “bone spurs.” You also said “see you tomorrow” to someone else, assuming all the ballots will be counted immediately after tomorrow. Apparently you’ve never witnessed a Presidential Election where it takes some states days, and possibly weeks, after the close of the polls to count the voters depending on state law. For instance, Colorado state law says that ballots have to be in by 7pm (MST) tomorrow night once the polls close. However, if a voter was notified there was an issue with their ballot, they have up to eight days, nine days this year due to the eight day falling on Veteran’s Day, to correct their ballot to be counted. Many states don’t even allow counting of ballots until after the polls close. https://www.npr.org/2020/11/01/930140373/fact-check-trump-falsely-claims-that-votes-shouldnt-be-counted-after-election-da

If you’re comparing your four year degree to a HS Civics lesson either you went to the most robust HS Civics program in the US, or your college is scholastically on par with Trident or Capella. My Poli Sci degree landed me a Masters in Cybersecurity from Georgetown, a doctoral program, and a almost six figure military contractor job. My class president, a Poli Sci major, is currently on his full ride to Harvard Law. Sounds like YMMV.

And cheated on him by a “Poly Sci,” not a Poli Sci, major...

Uh, NPR is centered bias, especially when compared MSNBC/CNN. Just because you don’t like what they said doesn’t mean your opinion, or theirs, is codified as fact. https://www.allsides.com/news-source/npr-media-bias

You respond by citing a tweet from the Fox News Producer and a known Conservative bias magazine/website. https://www.allsides.com/news-source/washington-examiner I guess the DNI doesn’t speak for the entire intelligence community. https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000175-4393-d7aa-af77-579f9b330000

For one the FBI hasn’t said anything other than they “have nothing to add” to what the DNI said. They’re not going to comment on an ongoing investigation. https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/fbi-hunter-biden-laptop-russia/2020/10/20/3478408a-133d-11eb-bc10-40b25382f1be_story.html “The Washington Post has been unable to verify the authenticity of any of the emails published by the New York Post, and the Biden campaign has disputed the New York Post’s claims about what the emails show.”

Or maybe other media outlets cannot very the authenticity of the source and/or story? There’s probably reason why only Trump friendly Fox News and the NY Post is running stories about Biden approximately two weeks from the election. I highly doubt it’s some massive suppression conspiracy, but I’m sure the Russians already found what to display in front of you, based on your metadata, so you can share on forums like this. https://www.businessinsider.com/new-york-post-hunter-joe-biden-giuliani-red-flags-disinformation-2020-10

Altus has radio stations?

You learned from where other than Fox News, NY Post, etc.?

And A-2 jackets aren't fire retardant, yet plenty of aircrew fly with them. Silly debate with a nonner.

Why should I, a civilian, pay for the premiums of military dependents under Tricare Prime? They didn't sign up for military service. They're not critical for national defense and security.

https://www.nytimes.com/1989/05/29/us/professional-board-clears-biden-in-two-allegations-of-plagiarism.html Do your last two sentences apply to Trump and the GOP as well?

Could you point when he ran in the 70s? Do you mean 1988?

So the DNI, who reports to Trump, was nominated by Trump for the job, and been in the job since this past May, says that an email that was “verified” authentic from an anonymous source who sent it to Fox News, a media organization that is Pro-Trump, says it’s not a smear campaign? Shocking 😂 https://apnews.com/article/024b553e9a4ffb2716286dd134876f8a “Yet Giuliani says foreign sources didn’t provide the Hunter Biden emails. He says a laptop containing the emails and intimate photos was simply abandoned in a Delaware repair shop and the shop owner reached out to Giuliani’s lawyer.” Seems “authentic.” So, the repair shop owner random reached out to the lawyer of the lawyer who’s job is to find dirt on Joe Biden, the father of the owner of the purported laptop, who’s running against Trump for President? And he did this possibly without trying to, I dunno, contact the owner of said laptop? Oh and the media outlets that are making a big deal of the emails? Fox News and The New York Post which are Pro-Trump.

What part of the GRU do you work for?

Uh, Roger Stone?

The F-22 does the same.

They are in some communities.

I’m a victim of your poor grammar, JFC.

The fly is Pence’s one black friend.

A lot of colleges are waiving GMAT/GRE scores due to the pandemic, FYI.

By skirting the Constitution, you mean “racing the rule book?” Show me a politician that doesn’t do that. It’s foolish to think that a party would “never be out of power.” Hell, Lindsay Graham just stepped over his dick recently by backtracking on this 2016 statement about nominating someone to a SCOTUS vacancy right before an presidential election. But he’s also a retired Guard O-6 JAG, which probably explains his two-face leadership skills.

Is it a treaty? Was he obligated to do so by the Constitution? Here, let’s have a look. ”The Constitution provides that the president "shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two-thirds of the Senators present concur" (Article II, section 2).” Ah, guess that applies to treaties, not accords or agreements. Obama taught Constitutional Law at one of the best law schools in the U.S. (U of Chicago). I bet he knew the difference, just like the reason why the Iran nuke deal was an agreement. Which the irony is since it was an agreement, it allowed Trump to revoke with without the consent of the Senate.

As a former Enlisted guy who got out, went to state school for undergrad, a prestigious private school for my masters, and just applied to a state school for a doctorates program, and have been through a few job interviews post-military, I would say where you go to school does matter somewhat. Your mileage my vary based on the industry you’re trying to go in. If it’s Civil Service or defense contractor (what I’m currently), I’d say it doesn’t matter. The government treats a JD from Yale and a JD from Texas Tech as the same, just check the box. My sister’s a recruiter and has told me that recruiters usually give applicants a pass if they have a “degree mill” school on their resume as long as they have a legitimate school for their other degree e.g USAFA for undergrad, Touro for grad school. At the last two jobs I’ve worked, where I went to college was brought up in the interview due to either the interviewer being alumni at the same college, or they were impressed by me going to a prestigious school in a competitive program. Like nunya said, plenty of legitimate state and private schools offer good graduate programs that are fully online or a hybrid (have to go in-residence for a few days on campus). You’ll have some people here post that they got a great job with their box checking degrees at degree mills and that’s great. But that’s obviously not the norm and just like what we’ve seen with the recent airline industry, especially as of yesterday, life can throw you a curveball and you’re polishing up your resume for something else.