Jump to content

LookieRookie

Supreme User
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    809

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

 Content Type 

Everything posted by LookieRookie

  1. LookieRookie
    Oh and all the TJAGs were fired
  2. LookieRookie
    As well as the CNO. https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/4074482/secretary-of-defense-pete-hegseth-statement-on-general-officer-nominations/ Lt Gen Razin Caine nominated to be next CJCS. https://www.af.mil/About-Us/Biographies/Display/Article/2942633/john-d-caine/
  3. LookieRookie
    I’m sure there is. I haven’t looked enough because I don’t work in A5/8
  4. LookieRookie
    I have altered the deal. Pray I do not alter it further.
  5. LookieRookie
    I should have put confirm in quotation marks. The bobs need SGTOs to make fake data to show have a “data driven” decision. just like that cuck Wills did with 2.5
  6. LookieRookie
    All of the bases suck. And the studs are already there. A5/8 needs to make the data confirm their idea works
  7. LookieRookie
    It’s your leadership trying to gobble it all up/you have IFF there
  8. LookieRookie
    Well before we did a dumbass ADS-B solution, the whole jet was supposed to be amped back in the mid teens. That would have fixed the whole problem. Also Beechcraft/Textron pitched a mod to convert all the tails to a B/C standard but the Air Force said nah fam, we got this.
  9. LookieRookie
    Nope, it’s pilot training, it’s not sexy enough
  10. LookieRookie
    Shack. The T-6 fleet neglect has destroyed it and DMSMS is leaving jets permanently grounded in FY26. IPT/FUPT is an HQ AETC initiative not 19th. The bobs finally are reorging it into a normal MAJCOM after Kwast fucked it and forced Shredder Sears from the A3 position since he wouldn’t delegate the A3 authority but Chuck Bolton would.
  11. LookieRookie
    Elon has brought in some random tech bro 20 year olds to help him. (Some graduating high school in 2022) Those people don’t have clearances and should absolutely not have access to classified material without proper security clearance vetting/training.
  12. LookieRookie
    Lockheed would have delivered multiple T-50s within 6 months of contract award. not Prototypes, real working jets ready to execute iot&e then student sorties
  13. LookieRookie
    https://www.dvidshub.net/video/950666/air-force-standards-update-tabs-gen-david-w-allvin-air-force-chief-staff what a joke. Preaches a team and not being individualized with his nerd GO lightweight embroidered jacket with a nickname.
  14. LookieRookie
    y are u nazi tho? Fr fr, on god, skibididi toilet no rizz.
  15. LookieRookie
    He tap dances around the fact that he required pentagon officials to confirm any potus or secdef orders through him even though he has no command authority.
  16. LookieRookie
    https://www.reuters.com/world/us/pentagon-pull-milleys-security-clearance-fox-reports-2025-01-28/ reuters article
  17. LookieRookie
    Well the whole premise was wrong. Of the 3 competitors, the T-7 was the only prototype and not in production COTS jet. There’s also a whole lot of problems with the T-7 which is why it can’t legally go into LRIP.
  18. LookieRookie
    Office space for the ORF
  19. LookieRookie
    I’ve talked about commercial training for ratings for a SGTO a bit before but here’s an actual AETC article talking about it. It’s the brain child of Matt Leard the AETC/A5/8. https://www.aetc.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/4024636/us-air-force-partners-with-academia-industry-to-test-future-pilot-production-mo/ oh and the T-7 is still a dumpster fire. https://www.airandspaceforces.com/usaf-rejiggers-t-7-plan/
  20. LookieRookie
    What in the TikTok gen z did you do?
  21. LookieRookie
    Back to circa 2013-2014 when CBM had less than 10 flyable jets. every instrument sortie was a night sortie
  22. LookieRookie
    FMS/mil tech transfer has conditions and oversight by the US government. It’s not new to Ukraine
  23. LookieRookie
    For reference here is what the page looked like right before the election. https://web.archive.org/web/20241007193219/https://www.af.mil/Diversity/
  24. LookieRookie
    It will be tested above 1.0 but the USAF didn’t pay for it to be certified so the placard limit will be below it. it was a desired not required part of the contract. If we pay Boeing they will magic wand make it supersonic.
  25. LookieRookie
    I mean I appreciate Clark’s engagement; however, his MO is these kind of proposals.
×
×
  • Create New...