sqwatch

I'm beginning to sense a one sided opinion.

Wow. I'll remember this the next time I bitch about MICT.

Does not have my call sign therefore worthless.

I've only talked to bros at three units, but they all say the same thing - get your resume squared away and knock out all available upgrades because the exodus from active duty has made even part time jobs competitive.

Super drink off!

Manchester!

I have no idea wtf this means.

Don't put words in my mouth (sts) Again, tnkrtoad, emphasis on the TANKR, is attempting to speak for a community he has demonstrated he knows little about, and for individuals that have circumstances other than his own. While no one has said (or no one I know will admit) that the money made them stay, the money DID get them to sign a 9 year commitment. NO ONE will sign a 9 year commitment, even the slugs or shinny pennies for free. It's a trade between AFPC and the individual.

Shack.

40 minutes with two bags. Geeze.

Another messenger shot.

Weird. My wing/cc, ccv, and og/cc are not patch wearers. Weird. They did go in-res to school though.

But I like the numbers! The aerospace says I have money to burn AND have a difficult time reading analog displays all in one package (sts).

PYB is back!

Interested in aerospace

Some interpreted this as a pass to chaff off the regs. Some rolled their eyes and continued on promoting institutionalized missprioritization of queep-before-mission. Some took this as an opportunity to be a thinking Officer and make decisions on what could be knocked-off when faced with limited resources. What camp are you in? 1. Proven legacy aircraft? I want what you're smoking. Proven against an enemy with the same counter-air weaponry as the Triple Entente. 2. I love to sh1t on AFPC, especially when they give me the shaft. But to say the only thing preventing this latest debacle from turning into the abortion that the '11 RIF was ONLY due to the sheer number of VSPs is a stretch, and lacking factual substance. I have no idea what goes on behind the AFPC curtain, but I have a hunch that they extended their eight hour duty day and shortened their two hour lunches with the amount of work that's been piled on their desks in the last year. In fact, I'm happy I'm not doing their thankless job and I make no claim that I could do better without some firsthand experience in what's happening right now. 3. Agree with this line except the quote at the end - "no ethic problem". This is how rumors are started. Here's what he actually said: "Do we have incidents? Absolutely," Welsh, the Air Force chief of staff, said in an interview. "Any organization with almost 700,000 people is going to have incidents. But we do not have an epidemic of bad ethical behavior by people across the Air Force. If you look at the numbers, that's simply not the case." also, "There's a big difference between an endemic or systemic problem and bad behavior by individuals. There's a big difference." https://www.airforcetimes.com/article/20140725/NEWS05/307250051/Welsh-gives-Air-Force-top-ethics-marks-Congresswomen-say-comments-troubling- Should I be diapered for the actions of a few? What would you tell congress? Would you agree with Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand that there's a systemic ethical problem and undermine the vast majority of Airmen that serve with distinction on a daily basis? Or would support your subordinate's hard work and dedication despite the actions of some individuals? Fvckin'a we have morale shirts, bullet proof mustaches, BBQ cook-offs and the like. The General tries to promote esprit de corps, and you tools use it against him. I get it, there are issues. To blame them on the best CSAF we've had in the last ten years is retarded.

Give the guy a break. If you had last month's overdue staff summary sheet still sitting on your desk and barely enough time to squeeze in a CGOC meeting during your two hour lunch break, you'd need a place to vent too.

OHANG was the same when I went through the b-course in '06. There are work-arounds. Real estate is pretty cheap outside the gate.

Ok? No. Realistic? Yes.

And none of them requested vectors direct UUEE without a flag on their left shoulder?

Bababooey!