I feel a bit remiss not adding some perspective to my last "trip of justice" post for those guys who may be considering FedEx. As far as the 777 goes, that was an above average trip - primarily for two reasons. 1) the front-end deadhead to Paris and 2) the one leg per duty period. But, if you take off the deadhead and have the trip start in Memphis, that's a very average and attainable trip for anyone with just a few years of seniority.. That is primarily because it's a flying trip (FO trip versus an RFO trip) and it's longer than some care to fly. FO trips are not as popular as RFO trips because every leg of an RFO trip is over 8 hours and typically generates more pay per duty period, potentially averaging as high at 8-10 hours of pay per day. I like flying to maintain some proficiency every now and then (as opposed to RFOing every month), I like deadheading from home to work in first class, so I don't mind the minor hit in pay per day to do a trip like that.
The nice thing about the 777 flying at FedEx is the trips are not hugely different. A much more junior trip than the one I had might have one or two duty periods with two legs intra-Asia or intra-Europe but other than that be very similar even including the deadhead to Paris. We have one somewhat notorious trip that has three short legs in one day from Cologne to Paris to Munich to Frankfurt which is the only time any of us see more than two legs in one day. The good thing is that it's all day flying (Europe day) but it obviously opens up the door to delays and weather challenges with more legs. The bottom line for now on the 777 flying at FedEx is that it's attainable relatively quickly for new hires and it's relatively good considering the other options.
Those other options are what I really wanted to throw out. The domestic, night flying that FedEx is famous for is really like being at a completely different airline. It really doesn't matter what aircraft you're talking about - MD-11/MD-10, A300, 767 or 757 all do the same kind of stuff. You commute in Monday night late, arrive Memphis around midnight or if you're local you show up for work at about 0200 and fly to city X, arriving around 0500-0700. The best case scenario is you stop there, go to the hotel and sleep as long as you can during the day. You leave 12-16 hours later, fly back to Memphis and do it all again the next morning and so on all week. The variables that make a particular schedule far better or far worse are length of flights, number of legs, direction of flights, etc. If you fly west, you land in the dark. Fly to the east coast and you're staring at the rising sun at top of descent which starts your body's wake-up cycle and makes it harder to sleep when you get to the hotel. Senior pilots are flying one leg from MEM to say, Birmingham (:45 block), arriving at 0500, laying over for 16 hours and flying one leg back to MEM that night, arriving just before midnight. They do the same thing three hours later - rinse and repeat all week. Or, they deadhead to Atlanta on Monday morning and leave that night at midnight to fly up to Newark and return to ATL by 0530 that morning. 17 hours later, they do the same evolution again. Repeat all week until arrival Friday morning from Newark. 10-12 hours later that Friday night, they deadhead home. Not bad duty if you live in Atlanta or can deadhead there easily, but I wouldn't say it's the easiest flying for those who may not adapt that well to back side of the clock work. There are far worse nights that consist of working between 2300 and 0600 flying three legs (Detroit-Newark-Syracuse-Buffalo) 14 hours off and then do the reverse routing the next night, similar layover and then start again in the original direction. They stick a Sunday night deadhead to Detroit and a Friday night deadhead home and it's doable, but you're working for you money - no doubt. The 757 pilots based in Cologne have some of the toughest flying we have. Similar night flying patterns to what I already described. Three legs a night on many trips in busy Euro airspace combined with typical winter weather challenges there make for some long, difficult duty periods.
There are pilots who choose this kind of flying because they may live in a particular city that allows them to be home every night (day) for their layovers or be in place already and forgo the deadhead to city X and get paid to be at home for most of day one and day last. Some like the daytime options which follow a similar pattern, leaving Memphis in the afternoon, short layover in city X, returning the following morning very early and repeating that afternoon for the week. Other guys just don't care for the long-haul options and are willing to accept the downside of the domestic pattern. Whatever the reason, we're fortunate that the wide variety of flying attracts all types and lots of pilots find their niche.
I just wanted to try to give some balance to the international snap shot I gave in the last post. Lots and lots of variety, but some is vastly different and considerably more work (in my opinion) depending on a/c, base and mission.