Leaderboard

Errr, fcuking with a national election and therefore the national infrastructure is pretty much a casus belli. I have not been recalled to active duty yet. Did I miss the call/text? I am not buying it. I could absolutely believe that the current Administration wouldn't do anything about it if it were true, but the fact that the IC is not in lock-step on this happening makes me lean toward an excuse of why Hillary lost since she wasn't supposed to according to all the Democrats and all the standard media. It couldn't have been her. Nope, gotta be the Russki's... They rolled her once before on the "reset" and have pretty much had their way like drunken Vikings with the rest of the current Administration, including the infamous "I'll have more room to maneuver" comment made by the soon to be ex-President back in the run-up to 2012. Why on earth would Vlad want take on an unknown (at best) or a guy who has stated he is for America first yet can work a deal as well? Yep, the logic checks yet again. Gotta be the Russki's...

Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network Forums

To clarify, if they, the Russians, hacked voting machines to change votes and screwed with results, that's pretty serious and worth changing DEFCON. If it's propaganda and spending money to stir the pot, then fair enough. We do it; can't blame them for doing it. Still don't think they did it. Much easier to cry "wolf!' than defend the crap contained in Hillary's e-mails and the DNC's. If the press chases that ball, there's less ink spilled on the real news revealed by Assange. The press also has a vested interest to discourage coverage of the damaging e-mails since so many of them were revealed to be in the tank for Hillary - sending stories for an "ok" prior to running; revealing GOP dirt to the campaign and not publishing the dirt until it was coordinated with the DNC; dancing at Hillary's nomination event; having dinner with the campaign a week prior to its announcing itself; literally providing debate questions to Hillary; and on and on and on. But I hold to my position that the Russians would have an easier time putting it to Hillary (how's THAT for a visual...) than Trump. Hillary & Co., to include, especially, the so-called MSM, simply can't fathom that they were wrong. It's us, not them. According to them anyway...

Never mind Obama sent a bunch of people to Israel to help BB lose an election with our tax dollars, which he didn't. And funny, the liberal says we can't go back 25 years to point out liberal hypocrisy.

Not sure if this was mentioned elsewhere. Hypocrisy, the one common denominator for all politicians.

Erotic Carp calendar... your welcome. https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2327321/the-erotic-carp-calendar-you-never-knew-you-needed-is-here-in-time-for-christmas/

Didn't Obama spend tons of money on propaganda and other dirty tactics trying to influence the election in favor of anyone except Netanyahu? I personally would like a refund from that failed effort. Also...

I was told the percentile was the ranking against everyone who took that exam. I understood as one pool of rankings from each test version.

Hmm, I know several school grads/students that regret saying yes. Pretty sure one is on this board. Personally, I said yes only because I didn't want to 7 day opt since I have 16 years TIS. I'm already wondering "what if" I'd said no, but not in the way you're implying. I'm wondering just how much QOL I'll be giving up over the next 4 years, how much seniority I'm losing, and if I'll end up regretting my decision to stay i.e. getting stop lossed just before retirement eligibility in 2020. I'll let you know once I get my post school assignment if I regret saying yes, but I'm not optimistic... BTW, I would have absolutely declined IDE in-res if I could've done so without 7 day opting. And I seriously considered it anyway.