Leaderboard

Be careful what you wish for. Alot uf us were excited about Norton Schwartz because he represented a break with the fighter mafia ... I'm happy with good leadership and am mostly indifferent to AFSC.

One step further would be not necessarily shitcanning every 365/remote assignment on the planet, but just the 95% that are complete ballwash/bullshit and have either zero real value or, almost as bad, may have some minor value, but they're forcing people to do them who's AFSC has nothing to do with the actual work. If you have to do a remote assignment once in your career, whatever, nobody would really care that much if it was in their primary job, but when you ask people to do one that involves stoplight powerpoints and that's about it...well, doesn't take an MIT grad to figure that one out.

I can't speak for everyone, but I know a sure fire way to get me to at least consider the bonus: Get rid of 365 deployments. I can deal with the queep, the SARC classes, the Freedom of Religion CBTs, and whatever other shit you can throw at me to try to get me to feel less like a pilot, but what I can't deal with is the potential kick in the junk of being away from my family for a year. You want to keep talent in the AF? Stop sending them to Bumfuckistan for a year to train pilots who couldn't care less whether they were flying planes or herding goats. There's no amount of cash on this planet that would get me to take that.

Imagine how easy it would be to make a remote-controlled or even fully autonomous train or monorail, but that isn't ever going to happen. The technology already exists to make fully automated passenger airliner flight (far simpler than the tech that goes into making that K-MAX work too), the issue isn't a technological one, it's a moral one. Two pilots checking each other and the aircraft systems, with their lives just as much at stake as everyone else's is the point. Even if you had a significant enough portion of the population who was willing to fly on such a jet, could you imagine the outcry and lawsuits that would take place in the event of an incident? It wouldn't even have to be a total-loss crash. A similar argument could be made for cargo planes, since they endanger other peoples lives even if the jet has no one on board. This is the same argument for rail freight. Exceptions like the K-Max are simple; the threat of the chopper crashing into something or someone is pretty low, and the extent of the damage would be limited. It also mostly only effects the military anyway. Just like flying cars and autonomous cars, it really makes my laugh to see companies throw tons of money at these projects. People can afford to have flying cars, they're called helicopters, you don't see many people flying them because of the safety, financial, and legal limits, not the technology. Watching Dr. Moller and his going-nowhere skycar project is pretty sad. Now seeing Google working on their no-one-is-gonna-buy-those-things-anyway car is just as sad (but also a bit funny).

Um, duh! ENJPPT is obviously better because only the top ROTC/AFA guys go there! Everyone knows valedictorians make the best pilots! Besides, everyone there gets a fighter, right?? They wouldn't do that if it wasn't the best base!