M2

So you're complaining that the administration didn't share classified intelligence?!? Speaking of which, do you have access to any real reporting outside of open source? Because if so, there's a lot you don't actually know. Go ahead and criticize all you want, but rralize you may not be the smartest guy in the room...

TR approves!!

Are you equally critical of the Biden and Obama administrations that put us in this shitty situation?!? Ya'll keep forgetting how we got there, and while Trump ain't no General George C. Marshall he really didn't have a lot of other options, did he? I typically oversimplify things, but the truth is the US put its head in the sand when it came to Iran for four decades; and it was only going to get worse if nothing was done about it. Sure, it would make more sense to have a well-thought out plan; and I sure the big brains at CENTCOM had a concept of operations gathering dust on the shelf for years; but in the immortal words of Sheriff Bud Boomer, "There's a time to think, and there's a time to act; and this gentlemen is no time to think!" RIP, John Candy!

If you haven't seen them already, the Iranian Lego propaganda films are entertaining and shocking all at the same time!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ZmIOg3BibU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5G9DNx7xIIc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gfBx6GxPw_k&list=RDgfBx6GxPw_k&start_radio=1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bJO-P0V2V0

Some of us do, but we can't talk about it here...

We still kick ass when it comes to CSAR! 👍👍 For a laugh, I asked Copilot (the AI, not the guy in the right seat!) which is about as deep as we want to get on here... U.S. MILITARY LESSONS LEARNED – OPERATION EPIC FURY 1. BLUF Operation EPIC FURY validated U.S. dominance in joint high‑intensity warfare but highlighted critical vulnerabilities in missile defense capacity, force protection, logistics endurance, and partner integration under sustained saturation attacks. 2. OPERATIONAL OVERVIEW Start: 28 Feb 2026 Lead: U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) Mission: Destroy Iranian missile capability, naval forces, and defense industrial base to prevent power projection and nuclear breakout. Scope: Large‑scale joint, combined air–maritime–cyber campaign against a peer‑capable regional adversary. 3. KEY LESSONS LEARNED A. JOINT INTEGRATION WORKS—BUT REQUIRES SCALE Observation U.S. forces achieved rapid air superiority, effective SEAD, and joint fires synchronization across domains. Lesson Joint integration is a decisive advantage, but only when properly resourced for sustained operations, not short campaigns. F‑35, long‑range bombers, submarines, and ISR platforms dominated early phases. Implication Future conflicts with peer adversaries will require: Larger munitions stockpiles Faster reconstitution Broader distributed basing B. MISSILE AND DRONE SATURATION IS THE PRIMARY THREAT Observation Iran employed mass volleys of missiles and drones, overwhelming regional defenses despite high intercept rates. Lesson Interceptor inventories are finite Missile defense success is measured in resilience, not perfection Saturation attacks still produced casualties and infrastructure disruption Implication The U.S. must: Expand interceptor production Integrate regional air/missile defense (IBCS‑like systems) Harden bases and civilian infrastructure C. CYBER AND SPACE ARE NOW FIRST-MOVE DOMAINS Observation Cyber and space effects were employed before kinetic strikes, degrading enemy C2, sensors, and communications. Lesson Cyber is no longer a supporting arm—it is a primary maneuver element Pre-positioned access is decisive Implication Cyber operations must be planned at campaign level Requires persistent access, legal frameworks, and resilient U.S. cyber defenses D. LOGISTICS AND SUSTAINMENT LIMIT CAMPAIGN LENGTH Observation The operation consumed massive quantities of: Precision munitions Fuel ISR flight hours Human endurance resources Lesson The U.S. can strike faster than it can sustain at current industrial capacity. Implication Industrial surge capacity is now a combat enabler Future wars will be won by logistics endurance, not opening salvos E. FORCE PROTECTION REMAINS A VULNERABILITY Observation U.S. personnel suffered hundreds of wounded and multiple fatalities, primarily from missile attacks on regional bases. Lesson Even with air superiority, fixed bases are vulnerable. Implication Expand dispersal, deception, and hardened infrastructure Improve warning and sheltering procedures across AORs F. PARTNER NATIONS ARE BOTH STRENGTH AND LIABILITY Observation Gulf partners enabled access but suffered direct retaliation and infrastructure damage. Lesson Allies require integrated—not parallel—defense architectures. Implication Defense cooperation must include shared command-and-control, not just basing agreements 4. STRATEGIC TAKEAWAYS U.S. dominance is real—but not inexhaustible Mass matters again (munitions, interceptors, logistics) Cyber-first warfare is now normal Missile defense determines societal resilience Campaign durability—not shock—is the decisive variable 5. WAY AHEAD (RECOMMENDED ACTIONS) Expand munitions and interceptor production lines Integrate cyber deeply into joint campaign planning Invest in regional missile-defense integration Harden and disperse critical basing Reform industrial mobilization planning

Well, for all you anti-Trump types, if you didn't shove that complete idiot Kamala Harris up against him in 2024, we might be in a different boat! Now, who exactly do you plan to run in 2028? Gavin Newsome? Pete Buttigieg? Harris again? Gretchen Whitmer? Alexandria Ocasio‑Cortez?!? 🤣🤣🤣 Don't blame us, blame yourselves for not taking the opportunity to present a viable candidate instead of complete nutbags that make our nutbags look half-sane! Chirp all you want about Trump, and he is a moron; but deep down you know damn well your side had nothing better!

Wow, talk about Old School!

What are you talking about? The site's running normal for me...

What makes you think it doesn't?!?

Absolutely! Based on the previous two Democratic administrations, she would have either a) buried her head even deeper into the sand and/or b) sent pallets of money to them in hopes to buy their cooperation. If you think she would have been smarter, please enlighten us all!

For all you critics of Trump, do you really think Harris would have done better?!? Serious question.