raimius

I think air defense really shined. Now the question is how do you get a good mix of capabilities and cost. Patriot/THAAD are nice, but you can't afford to smack every shahed with one. Hardening critical infrastructure and capabilities to prevent easy kills by cheap systems is looking wise, as well.

Someone else suggested WALDO.

Well, that happened...the Ayatollah is dead. Seems odd that Iran decided to drone strike civilian airports in response (amongst other strikes). Wonder what's next.

AI doesn't do so hot at friendly vs enemy recognition.

By "fixed" you mean pushed more basic training on the FTUs? We cut an entire phase out of UPT to "fix" it.

Talk to your leadership (more than just the CC, but start there) about why you ranked so low, and how you can improve. Flt/cc is probably the biggest thing. If they don't trust you for that, how can they make you an FGO?

The way you phrase it makes it sound like you have a superiority complex and blame external things when you don't get what you want. That may or may not be true, but that's the one-post impression. If the AF doesn't do it for you, go seek greener pastures. Figure out what is important to you, and go do that. Best wishes that you find what fulfills you.

I am wondering when the US government is going to conclude that Putin doesn't want to quit until he crushes Ukraine.

My name tags are legal now? Nice, I guess.

Sounds like a cost effective plan to make more capable pilots. Im sure the AF will reject it. Details depend a lot on what the MWS community needs. Some sort of medium performance aircraft would make sense. Single-pilot capable, with room for an instructor/mentor seems ideal. ....that all said, this seems like a bandaid for insufficient UPT/FTU training....so, probably spot-on.

There is no Phase III in UPT anymore.

This is UPT currently, except there is no advanced trainer for the majority of students...they go straight to FTU. It's half of a successful plan.

Glad both crews made it. I'd hate to be that safety officer!

🥃🥃🥃🥃

Rt4 and glidepath to Rwy33 gave less than 100ft of vertical clearance. Allowing ATC to give that clearance was poor design. Actually clearing traffic on that section of Rt4 while landing airliners to 33 was a huge error on ATC, imo. The crew biting off on the wrong airliner for vis sep was the final nail. I think it's obvious the designer of the HRC was thinking about Rwy 01 ops vs 33.