ClearedHot Posted January 24, 2012 Share Posted January 24, 2012 Drone pilot finds “river of blood” outside Dallas meatpacking plant http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/sideshow/drone-pilot-finds-river-blood-outside-dallas-meatpacking-155450010.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BQZip01 Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 I'm just not seeing any "river" anywhere. Moreover, isn't the Red River close by? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Grind Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 Shopped Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vertigo Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 Nope. Found it. http://maps.google.c...ompany&t=h&z=17 Yuck. If you zoom in you can definitely see the blood... especially at the point where it connects to the larger river. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Majestik Møøse Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 It's more like a Creek of Blood, but whatever. I'm amazed that it took so long to catch these guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 That is not blood. First, it is obvious that this plant has no kill floor so there is no blood to create a "river of blood." Second, meatpackers that do have a kill floor do not dispose of the blood. They process it and sell it. The blood is money. Some of you guys need to become interested in the outdoors. Anyone who has fished a river has seen this kind of thing where a stream enters a river, especially a clouded river like this one. If I was Columbia Packing I would come after Yahoo for posting this bullshit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Majestik Møøse Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 (edited) That creek definitely gains a red hue downstream of the plant. If it isn't blood than it's something else. Edited January 25, 2012 by Majestik Møøse Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Grind Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 Nope. Found it. http://maps.google.c...ompany&t=h&z=17 Damn, thwarted again. Maybe there's a lot of iron in the soil? If it's not blood, what else could tint the water red? That is not blood. First, it is obvious that this plant has no kill floor so there is no blood to create a "river of blood." Second, meatpackers that do have a kill floor do not dispose of the blood. They process it and sell it. The blood is money. Some of you guys need to become interested in the outdoors. Anyone who has fished a river has seen this kind of thing where a stream enters a river, especially a clouded river like this one. If I was Columbia Packing I would come after Yahoo for posting this bullshit. Then whats your verdict, Walt? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClearedHot Posted January 26, 2012 Author Share Posted January 26, 2012 That is not blood. First, it is obvious that this plant has no kill floor so there is no blood to create a "river of blood." Second, meatpackers that do have a kill floor do not dispose of the blood. They process it and sell it. The blood is money. Some of you guys need to become interested in the outdoors. Anyone who has fished a river has seen this kind of thing where a stream enters a river, especially a clouded river like this one. If I was Columbia Packing I would come after Yahoo for posting this bullshit. I don't think Columbia is going to sue anyone... 1. This is not a story that just popped up, it looks like an investigation has been ongoing for at least two months complete with a search warrant that found an unauthorized secondary drainage pipe from the slaughterhouse floor. 2. The Slaughterhouse comment does seem to imply there was a kill floor. 3. The investigation also found evidence of pig blood in the river. I am sure there is more to the story, but thus far i don;t see a hatchet job by Yahoo or Foxnews. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/01/25/texas-environmental-group-blasts-alleged-river-blood-flowing-from-dallas-meat/?test=latestnews Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest one Posted January 26, 2012 Share Posted January 26, 2012 Didn't Obama just talk about how companies should not be regulated on pointless things like dealing with milk spills. I guess dealing with spilled blood is a little more serious. I know Obama was just making a joke about spilled milk but I am pretty sure if a company accidentally spilled 20,000 gallons of milk in a waterway there would be pretty serious environmental issues. I wonder how many gallons of blood is being disposed like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SVFR Posted January 26, 2012 Share Posted January 26, 2012 At least Dallas won't have to worry about approving mosque building sites downstream. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BQZip01 Posted January 26, 2012 Share Posted January 26, 2012 (edited) That is not blood. First, it is obvious that this plant has no kill floor so there is no blood to create a "river of blood." Second, meatpackers that do have a kill floor do not dispose of the blood. They process it and sell it. The blood is money. Some of you guys need to become interested in the outdoors. Anyone who has fished a river has seen this kind of thing where a stream enters a river, especially a clouded river like this one. For those who don't know how a slaughterhouse works, here's an educational video (no, Rainman, it isn't powerpoint...) My favorite line: Troy: Come on Jimmy, let's take a peek at the killing floor. Jimmy: Ohhh! Troy: Don't let the name throw you Jimmy... ...it's not really a floor, it's more of a steel grating that allows material to sluice through so it can be collected and exported. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bps-xbo8wnA Edited January 26, 2012 by BQZip01 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 26, 2012 Share Posted January 26, 2012 LOL. FIFY. Actually, I asked a couple questions and have a debrief alibi: There is, in fact, a kill floor at this facility. I didn't recognize it right away because the place is so ancient. The hogpens are actually on the north end of the building (rusty corrugated roof). A normal packer with a kill floor has rendering facilities to manage the blood and the rendering portion for this plant seemed inadequate for that....which is true...which is why they're dumping the excess blood through a 99 year old pipe directly into the river. Target PID = UNSAT. Reaccomplish with dry only passes until min satisfactory level achieved on subsequent sortie. Debriefed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 26, 2012 Share Posted January 26, 2012 Didn't Obama just talk about how companies should not be regulated on pointless things like dealing with milk spills. I guess dealing with spilled blood is a little more serious. I know Obama was just making a joke about spilled milk but I am pretty sure if a company accidentally spilled 20,000 gallons of milk in a waterway there would be pretty serious environmental issues. I wonder how many gallons of blood is being disposed like that. There is already adequate regulation in place to address what these dumbasses are doing. The point he was making would be to say no one can build a meatpacking plant within 50nm of a river because one time at band camp a company called Columbia Packing spilled blood into a river. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prozac Posted January 26, 2012 Share Posted January 26, 2012 There is already adequate regulation in place to address what these dumbasses are doing. Hit the nail on the head. Smart regulation is a necessity in all industries. Usually, it's already there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClearedHot Posted January 26, 2012 Author Share Posted January 26, 2012 There is already adequate regulation in place to address what these dumbasses are doing. Exactly! All to often our lawmakers want to make hay in the press and call for ever more intrusive legislation when in fact all that is needed is enforcement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spaceman Posted January 26, 2012 Share Posted January 26, 2012 Exactly! All to often our lawmakers want to make hay in the press and call for ever more intrusive legislation when in fact all that is needed is enforcement. Hence gun control... even though it's always been illegal to murder people. And many other examples along the same lines... Whoa it's getting pretty libertarian in here, I'm out before I say something crazy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BQZip01 Posted January 26, 2012 Share Posted January 26, 2012 Hence gun control... even though it's always been illegal to murder people. And many other examples along the same lines... Whoa it's getting pretty libertarian in here, I'm out before I say something crazy Hey reckless driving was a crime long before drunk driving and cell phone usage were banned, but that didn't stop our lawmakers from passing more complicated laws... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Standby Posted January 26, 2012 Share Posted January 26, 2012 Actually, I asked a couple questions and have a debrief alibi: ... Target PID = UNSAT. Reaccomplish with dry only passes until min satisfactory level achieved on subsequent sortie. Debriefed. Honest question: do you Tactical-Tom your conversations all the time or just on the internet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 26, 2012 Share Posted January 26, 2012 Honest question: do you Tactical-Tom your conversations all the time or just on the internet? Well, Douchemanlike Dan, is that really an honest question? I try to be amusing and bust my own balls for making an incorrect statement and you need to pile on with this Buzzkill-Bob kind of question? So, if I answer yours will you answer mine, that is if you're not too busy in R-2915B? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Standby Posted January 26, 2012 Share Posted January 26, 2012 Well, Douchemanlike Dan, is that really an honest question? I try to be amusing and bust my own balls for making an incorrect statement and you need to pile on with this Buzzkill-Bob kind of question? So, if I answer yours will you answer mine, that is if you're not too busy in R-2915B? Yes, it really is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swash Posted January 28, 2012 Share Posted January 28, 2012 (edited) Update: http://www.foxnews.c...test=latestnews "an accident" caused by a "clog in the sewer line." Edited January 28, 2012 by Swash Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HU&W Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 Update: http://www.foxnews.c...test=latestnews Blood clot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nsplayr Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 Took ya three shots there to get your response right, eh rainman? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 Took ya three shots there to get your response right, eh rainman? No shit! Talk about a senior fucking "the internet is difficult" moment. This really isn't my thread. Thanks for pointing that out, I hadn't even noticed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now