-
Posts
2,209 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
58
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Blogs
Downloads
Wiki
Posts posted by BashiChuni
-
-
ukraine never has and never will be a vital national security concern for the united states of america.
the only reason we care is because our corrupt politicians have corrupt dealings in a corrupt eastern european nation.
why was the president's crack head son doing business there? why was then vice president biden interjecting in a ukranian prosecutor's firing?
our economy and politics are not tied to events in ukraine. they only are if you want them to be.
-
1 hour ago, FourFans said:
The only victory to be had will be the most costly kind, and we all get to help pay the price in some form or fashion. That's history. It's happened before and will happen again.
i reject this outright. and this type of thinking has characterized our disastrous foreign policy post WWII
we are americans. we are not ukranians. the founding fathers would be appalled
-
ive read all of them
- 2
-
1 hour ago, ClearedHot said:
@BashiChuni not being pejorative, but your optic is somewhat tainted having been raised in what we want to be the American way of war. Declare an objective, go take it quickly, packup and go home. Thanks to support from the west and ever more efficient weapons have both exposed the faulty Russian war machine and equalized Ukraine on the battlefield. Sadly the fight in Ukraine has settled into a battle of attrition that in years past would have favored Russia giving their willingness to endlessly throw their youth into the meat grinder. Yes Ukraine wants to counter attack and regain their territory, but as long Russia continues to try and conquer Ukraine, then Ukraine has accidentally settled into the strategic position the German Commander Falkenhayn had at Verdun where the purpose was not to out maneuver or gain strategic position, but to bleed the "French white."
Ukraine is paying a horrific price, a cost that is purposely not being told, but as long as Ukraine has the support of the west, they will survive, Russia is alone and the impact is long and will be far reaching. The impact of years of internal social issues and this conflict has reduced their young working male population, an issue that will manifest in several years and further accelerate the decline Russia as a world power. Russia's Navy has been hurt, Russian's Air Force has been seriously degraded and Russia's army is in tatters. Putin's expansion has been stopped and his dream of rebuilding the FSU is dead. We need to keep it buried.
if this is a war of attrition ukraine has lost.
i'd place my bet on the russian bear to bleed slower than the ukranians. history backs this up.
-
3 hours ago, FourFans said:
No one. That's who's winning. It's war. No one wins in war.
Counter question: What do you think would happen afterwards if Russia were allowed to go unchecked by western support? US and NATO stops supporting Ukraine, as you think should happen, and Russia dominates and takes the entire of Ukraine. Then what? You think he'll stop?
yes. invading ukraine (a NON NATO) country with historical ties to Russia/USSR, is a much different calculus than invading other european countries.
nuance is a beautiful thing. and guess what....if putin decided to push farther then NATO kicks their ass. simple.
-
12 hours ago, uhhello said:
Define winning.
absolute obliteration of your enemy.
- 1
-
55 minutes ago, uhhello said:
What did we find out?
you tell me.
who's winning?
-
the time to use soft power was long past. expanding nato was a HUGE strategic mistake. putin didn't just wake up and decide to invade ukraine.
we were fucking around in russia's backdoor for decades and guess what...we found out
- 1
- 2
-
C. it's not our fight
-
"for the good of the world"
please.
so tired of the globalists.
- 1
-
-
-
This is a continuation of our disastrous foreign policy of intervening in regional conflicts where we do not belong
-
-
Looks like that Ukrainian war isn’t going so well…
-
ah gottcha
seems smart!
-
1 hour ago, Ganderly8 said:
Hello,
wondering if anyone here knows much about the new Rated Demonstration program bonus for this FY?
I'm currently a former CSO going through UPT with a ADSC til FY25. At first glance at this PSDM it looked like I wouldn't be eligible but looking at it further I can't find anywhere it flat out says I'm ineligible. Specifically under the ETP section where it mentions "aviators who are currently in UFT who have not incurred the UFT ADSC" may request an ETP. Not sure who else that sentence would apply for other than cross-training folks.
I know its a long shot but I'm not gunna not ask, seeing as how they've got my ass for the full twenty either way...
Thanks!
don't you already incur 10 years additional ADSC after UPT?
-
3 hours ago, CaptainMorgan said:
Rated Liar for Life is at it again…
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkDAMN! SHOTS FIRED!!!
-
his family should sue the shit out of shitspin
- 1
- 3
-
-
https://open.spotify.com/episode/79jUT27WJEkb6wVqkOOeSB?si=OjdWtmT4S5qseBUdkOvP0w
Great long form Ukraine discussion
- 1
-
-
-
successes? i don't see a whole lot of winning there...
- 1
Russian Ukraine shenanigans
in General Discussion
Posted
let them be emboldened. putin isn't going to capture europe. that's extreme gas lighting and won't happen. hell he can't even take kiev and the experts are shrieking about paris. gmafb.
the second putin crosses into NATO i'll be interested. until then i DGAF