stract

He was. I got to escort him once when I was a cadet.

there's a difference between it being hard-wired into each room on base and paying one service-provider for the access and buying your own satellite and doing it that way (my unit has a satellite in OIF). Although it's cheaper with the base-wide ISP, I've experienced it's faster if you have your own and limit the number of computers so there's more bandwidth for all. But then you have to worry about selling the satellite to someone when you leave (we just left ours in the CSAR compound in the hands of our sister squadron since we'll be back in 3 months).

my point being (since I already mentioned see-and-avoid, thank you very much) that they throw so many aircraft up into a limited amount of airspace and they're all doing different things (solo stud on a PA ride being the most fun/scary) that it's a wonder someone hasn't hit someone else. If you ever happen to be flying through Pensacola, avoid Alert Area 292 at all costs. Stay down on the coastline and you'll be the safest.

agreed. NACWS sucks. I flew the T-34, and there were many times when NACWS never responded when it should have (one time we were both belly up turning for initial into an aux field...). Then there were the times when NACWS went off and marked the location of the other aircraft in the incorrect quadrant. Always awesome. Surprised there haven't been more midairs at CC and Pcola, seeing as how the Navy does "alert areas" and it's all see-and-avoid, none of this cube-of-space in a MOA stuff like the AF does.

The build-up came from Boeing themselves, and I have a 45-sec video of them taking it apart (hour and a half or so) and putting it back together (2h 58m), which was their demo for the contract. The time to mission ready was from talking to some Campbell guys, but now that I think about it, they weren't MX, they were aircrew. So the time they quoted me might not be the most accurate.

the article I linked talks about mission ready vs flight ready...and the csar-x platform is very very close to the MH-47, so not huge differences in basic aircraft systems. also, the fact that the transmission has to be removed from the shithook, and all the blades, means that onces it's put back together it's going to require an FCF for tracking and balancing. I don't have any experience with tracking and balancing a Chinook, but in the 60, it takes multiple flights to get everything where it needs to be should a blade be replaced. I can only imagine this is a tad bit more involved with an aircraft having 2 rotor systems.

no, obviously you don't understand the difference between "mission ready" and "flight ready". The S-92 can be "mission ready" approx 1 hr after rolling off the back of a C-17/C-5, with minimal personnel participation (aka max of 10 people, and no cranes). The shithook requires 2 cranes, at least 20 people, and 2 hrs 58 min to be "flight ready". I have the video of this. From personal experience, it took approx 5 MX and 5 Ops personnel 20 min to make a 60 "mission ready" last year. And there were no cranes involved. From talking to Army MX personnel on this last deployment, it takes them appox 48 hrs to get a shithook to "mission ready" status.

Patrick also has a history of being impatient with the schoolhouse (as does Alaska). If you get hired by either of these two units and then see delays at KIKR, expect to get pulled back to your unit to finish the initial qual. TOML, how's the 701C mod going so far? When I left they were supposed to start the first bird in Oct...

and there was much rejoicing in the CSAR community.... https://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/sto...rement%20Change way to go AFSOC. Glad we're back in ACC now, and here's hoping the IG investigation comes to fruition. I'm perfectly willing to fly the HH-60 a little while longer as long as it gets us the right platform for our mission in the end (which is NOT the shithook).

Unfortunately for the helicopter community, all BFE (was BHFE for us) got consolidated at Altus this past year. Feedback from our IFs (Instructor Flight Engineers) both home station and at Kirtland is that this has made a lot more work for them having to retrain all the studs in the helo stuff before they hit the flightline. Has made the course longer, etc etc. Nobody in our community likes it.

I was just at KIRK for upgrade, and the Transition Course (for those who are coming over from Hueys, 53s, and Navy/Army) is approx 5 months long. There were 2 former Navy dudes, both qualified in the SH-60, who were doing this course. One was going to stay AD and be an IP at KIKR, and the other was hired by the 301st (Patrick - Reserves). He was going through as a 60 -1 IP, then once he gets mission experience he'll get Tac IP. Which unit is hiring you?

eh, MX can just keep throwing more metal up there to beef up those pesky 308 beam cracks... we can use the $$ for things like a better AHHS, a 3rd KY-58, a color HDD (supposedly the Reserves are testing that one right now), or even the 701D upgrade would be nice, maybe a wide-chord blade or two. Or maybe SADL, or the short-barrel .50 cal.

well at least there's some good info about sustaining our current fleet: https://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/sto...channel=defense

Well, that one there isn't really followed in our community. With the exception of DM and KIKR, every rescue (read HH-60) unit I've flown with uses the same callsign. And I know I've only used the VCSL twice for cross countries in the 3 years I've been here. Oops. I know we've made up callsigns on the fly before (we were Ivan flight when we hurevac'd for Ivan, for example, and Hooah on the way home....flight lead was a Former Army Guy).

I have this version and the tan version.

we had a guy with a ######ed up back go fly the Pred for a tour, and now I'm hearing rumors he's had surgery and trying to get back into the community.

first of all, it's IMPAC. Secondly, if a helo squadron (that rarely leaves a 3-state area) can get ALL the sectionals and TACs and keep them up to date, that's saying a lot (or a little) about your squadron. Thirdly, we just grab what we need from base ops if it comes down to it, since they stock everything, too (the occasional GP or AP-1, etc).

have you looked at using the Excel2FV2 program to see if it exports files into usable formats for you to code into your Google Earth thing? https://www.mission-planning.com/ to download the program. Among other things, it's EXCELLENT at merging multiple drawing files.

assuming you're talking about the Instrument test, and not the IRC, which is NOT a prerequisite for taking the test. The IRC can be taken with 5 hrs of CBT and 1 hr of instruction with an AIS graduate. The Instrument test, as others have mentioned, is open book, and it's HIGHLY recommended that you take ePubs in there with you and utilize the SEARCH function in Adobe to avoid much pain.

from reading the track select/assignment night thread, I can already see there have been at least 2 CV-22s drop out of Rucker recently. Congrats on helos, you'll have a blast at Rucker. Live in Enterprise. Syllabus has changed a lot since I was there so I don't have much more useful info to add in that regard. Not sure when the first TH-1H comes online, but it'll have a glass cockpit. Guessing you'll still be flying the mighty UH-1H in all its Vietnam glory and bullet hole patches.

You're a poser! Everyone know's it's Keep It Simple, Stupid. Geez... ;)

Agreed on the Silencer. I have the Asphalt frame (almost-black color) and I got the Reflex lenses for when I'm home, but the grey ones (non-polarized so legal in a uni) work great. Amazingly clear as stated above, and definitely cut down on the glare in the Desert. I don't wear them flying (we have a nice big tinted visor on our cool Darth Vader helmets) but they are indispensible walking around with the high albedo.

the few peeps we've sent from Moody to AIS recently learned a lot, but it seems, based on the products they were provided with and then regurgitated to us, that the course spends little (if any at all) time on helicopters and instruments. One guy spent a week going through all the presentations and changing the answers to the correct ones for RW so that he could give us a decent IRC class. One would think AIS would be able, since their sole mission in life is to make us all better instrument pilots, to provide products to helo drivers for use back at home station with the correct helo-related infomation contained within, since -GASP- the AF flies helos, too, because a lot of our regulations governing instrument flying are different than FW. Helicopter pilots are people, too! [/rant]

don't forget the 820th SFG (the contingency response bubbas, though I hear they're going to break off the wing and be a tenant again). Not flying, but definitely ops-types. about as close as you can get to being SOF without being SOF. and the 563rd has an OL-A at Nellis for the 66th RQS (60s) and 58 RQS (PJs).

FYI, in case everyone didn't already know, Cingular/AT&T gives military a 39% discount on phones, 25% discount on accessories, and a 19% service plan discount. Go to the business solutions link, then Fed Govt, and fill our your .mil e-mail addy and you'll get a link to the webpage with all the discounts. I'm not sure if the iPhone is there or not, since I don't have access to my .mil acct right now, but it's probably worth it to check out. And you can suspend your service when you deploy and have your phone number still waiting for you when you return, free.