HeloDude

Wait…so you’re saying that the media being upset with a religious organization for its values is valid if that religious organization is large and has influence…but if there’s another major (but smaller) religious organization doing similar (or worse) things, that it’s ok for that same media to not call them out because they have less influence? Dude, I know you’re a progressive and you’re not very pro-religion, but you’re either intentionally being obtuse about this, or we’ll just never see eye on it because our values and opinions are quite different. Either way, it is what it is.

Are you suggesting that Muslims in Middle East are worse towards LBTQ folks than Christians in the US? You’re really reaching here, even for you.

Check this out…

Do you want examples because you disagree that this happens?

But to answer your question, the bias is that it’s more acceptable in the media to be easier on non-Christian religions/leaders when they screw up vs not. Example—how often is it reported about how Christian denominations are against LGBT-whatever, abortions, gay marriage, etc compared to how often it’s reported how the Muslim faith sees those same issues.

Wait…so then what is media bias if it’s not reporting what your viewers want to see?

By your logic, there is zero media bias as they’re all just selling advertising. Or…bias means that they only cover what their viewers want to see?

No worries man, I was just posting for sake of conversation. Best of luck and hope it all works out well for you and your family.

A little confused here… From what you wrote, I interpret that you didn’t do your (what I assume) ACSC correspondence, you believe that you would have made O-5 (I assume that’s what you got passed over for) if you would have done your correspondence, you have a bonus (assume) and took continuation which prevents you from getting out of your bonus earlier…but you’re also hoping to be able to retire earlier under TERA? If this is all true, then why didn’t you do your ACSC correspondence and/or why didn’t you just decline continuation to get out of your bonus (which I assume you took)? I know you said this “may have been done purposely”…but I have yet to meet anyone who wanted to do 20 years in the AF and who would rather retire as a Major than a Lt Col. By the way, from my vantage point, very few people that make Lt Col, and are not in the top 1/3 of selects, get non-vol’d to become commanders and/or get staff jobs since the priority is to fill cockpits. Unless something has changed quite a bit recently? I know that I offer a lot of assumptions on my part, but it’s what I gathered from your post.

Oh it is 100% media bias. If you think the media only reports (and to what level) on what the country finds “interesting”, then we’ll just have to disagree.

Thanks for confirming the bias in the media! For what it’s worth, I’m not a Catholic.

That’s exactly my point…the media will provide more coverage if the pope did what the Dalai Lama did…so why is that?

Got it—bias. We should judge individuals on their actions, not on the actions of others.

Are you suggesting because of what some priests did that makes what the Dalai Lama did ok? This was in the news for one day at the most and that was it. I’m sure if the Pope did the same thing it would have been in the news for more than a day…

Appreciate the responses, but my post was in response to Pooter saying that people vote on party lines and when they don’t, they vote on candidate personality. A California Dem primary is already composed of Dems (so no party line vote), so are Dems in California saying Kamala and Newson were picked in their primaries because of their respective personalities were the best available?

If Kamala or Gavin are so bad, then why were they able to win their Dem primaries in California?

If this dude transitions to a female then precedent shows that a Democrat President will commute his sentence.

Are you suggesting that if it was reported today that the Pope did something extremely inappropriate with a child (like what the Dahli Lama just did) that it would have been handled the same in the media as what we saw with the Dahli Lama?

California is literally the epitome of what happens with progressive policies…and yet you’re saying the country wants progressive policies? Btw, I always find it funny how people like Nsplayr enjoy living in a state like Tennessee, but yet will tell you how bad TN is wrt their politics and how much better Cali is…but continues to stay in TN.

If that’s your response, I’m guessing you don’t disagree with my post.

If this was done by a Catholic Bishop or the Pope, or a leader in the Baptist church, you wouldn’t hear the end of it from the majority of the media.

So it’s your opinion that the Democrats are using the judicial system to intentionally affect the outcome of a future election? Does this bother you at all?

Are there any Democrats in the House or Senate who you would label an “extremist”, and if so, who are they?

Is this why you became a nav?

Not even close man. I suggest you read those books you’re referring to in your post.