HuggyU2

So, if you stay as a WSO, what aircraft are your choices (in a "perfect" world)? Also, what's a "non-tactical aircraft", in your eyes?

As someone who enjoys the rich lexicon of our flying world, I'm curious to know more about this. I'm not part of the fighter fraternity, and as such, I do not plan to use this particular toast, so don't worry about that. Can you post the poem here? Can one of you fighter-types elaborate further?

Neat! I've never seen how one of these ceremonies went, so I appreciate you sharing the photos.

Those rejoins are done at over 7G's. And it's a pretty fast onset. Whiz, if he's got some extra smash, say 475KIAS, could the Hornet pull into 8 G's? As for the G-suit discussion, everytime we go through TARF refresher, they point out the the G-suit will give you about 1G of extra protection. However, dehydration can quickly rob you of that extra G, and as it gets worse, rob you of 3+ G's. Most of my high-G fighter buds say the G-suit is really good at giving you endurance, e.g. it will help you to continually pull G's over the course of 2 sorties in a day. They also say that they continually drink water between sorties/engagements to keep their tolerance up. I'm afraid that no matter what the investigation comes up with, we'll see the "experts" scream that the Blues need G-suits. But the Blues pilots say that the constant inflating/deflating of the G-suit would complicate the finesse inputs required to do what they do. Also, remember that the Blues have a spring on their control stick that is pulling the nose down with lots of weight (40 lbs, if I remember right). That would be tough to hold for 40+ minutes. When you see the cockpit video shots, you'll often see their right hand come into view and they'll shake it out and give it a few seconds of rest time.

PIT IP's are made up of pilots from various MWS' out there. It's not like they put on the AETC patch and become "cock-ish". Some are better IP's than others. Some are better people than others. You can't control it anyways, so just wait and meet the IP's in your flight, and go from there. You'll have a great time, although you'll get tired be graded by the time it's over. Leave: if your sister is getting married, or you have a "life event", they'll work with you to get a Friday off. But if you want to burn a week of use-or-lose and go party in South Padre, it ain't happening. Get rid of your use-or-lose now.

Your military commander at IFS is a great guy. I've known him for years. Go talk to him and tell him you've got concerns.

Our overseas squadrons have purchased Garmins exclusively. We used to use the Pilot III a few years back: it was very good. If you can find a used one, it would be cheap. I don't think they make it any more. Next, we went to the 196, then the 296. We also bought some 96's. Everyone loves the 196/296. No one likes the 96. I tried it once, and went back to my old Pilot III. The menu's on the 196/296 are intuitive, and the large screen is really nice. If you're just doing G.A. flying with it, a used 196 on eBay might be the way to go. I just used a 396 a few months ago on a trip. It had an XM radio subscription to get weather radar. Very handy. I have no experience using them on the road/highways. Note the 196 in the photo on the far left canopy rail. Those mountains with snow ain't the Sierras, either.

Yes. After you graduate, you'll go TDY to PIT. It lasts just about 4 months,... maybe a tad less. I don't think FAIP's will proficiency advance much, although many of the MWS types might.

For you officers: if you're not having a word with these E's about their demeanor, decorum, or whatever, then you need to. Yes, I've been to Dhafra, and I know it might elevate. But if you're right, and they're out of line, then do something good that you can post on FI.com when you get back. Rant off.

I'm guessing they are concerned about putting a 2Lt into a $220M fighter that has no two-seat training option.

Tumbleweed, Is 59K the limit then? If not, is one specified, at least for training? Above Armstrong's Line (63K), I don't believe the Combat Edge/GSuit combo will keep you alive. You'll "boil".

Go ahead and use one of the electronic ones, if it will help with computing/correlating times and doing conversions. But definitely DO NOT give up the paper logbook. And when you fill it out, throw in some comments about the flight. You'll be glad you did a few years later when you're cracking it open to look back for some reason. Great memories are had in those books. Especially when you read the comments about what happend or what you did on a cross country to Randolph on a Friday night... or the Houston Airshow. The paper logbook (Version 1.0) won't "crash", either. And I don't know this for a fact, but I think it looks pretty top-shelf to an interviewer when you hand him a career's-worth of flying in on of those logbooks. I'm very glad I kept my flight info and times the "manual way".

Anyone have any experience with a hip replacement or hip resurfacing, and getting back on flight status? I know about the Mountain Home guy in 1998 that was the first in an ejection seat. And I've talked to the Tyndall F-22 guy that had his about 5 years ago. I'm looking for new info. Thanks.

Not that I care whether you wear it or not, I got a flight with the Navy earlier this month, and some of the pilots and life support folks commented on the fact that I didn't have a pen flap. They said that wouldn't float, if I were a Navy pilot: they have to have them. Sort of ironic that this thread came out just after this happened. This thread has some good comedy. Now, when does the thread on "Peter Pockets" get cranked up?

FWIW, our unit took an Interservice Transfer from the Coast Guard. He was a C-130 pilot with about 12 years in the CG. He put on the USAF uniform, and it was tranparent. He can retire next year from the USAF, if he wants.

Weed is to bourbon as MD 20/20 is to cabernet. However, I did have a shot of weed last night. First time this year, too.

YGBSM! Say it isn't so!!

A tangent, but a good story: Boeing offered to put a sidestick on the 777. Since United was the launch customer, they had the choice. Since the UAL folks involved with the consultations were older pilots that grew up with a yoke, that's what the 777 got stuck with. What a shame.

My guess is that Toro and Hoser won't have any comment on this until after 5 Jan... in fact, they may decide that posting anything about this incident is a bad choice. As one who hit "Send" about 5 years ago and incurred the wrath of a 4-star and MAJCOM Chief Master Sgt, I wouldn't blame Toro and Hoser if they stayed quiet.... but I got to say that I hope someone outside of the 4th finds out what happens on this ort sortie, and posts it. Side note on the 4th Wing CC: I met him when he was the OG at DLF around Jan '04. You don't see too many O-6 OG's with Senior Pilot wings. This guy is on the high speed track to some stars. [ 21. December 2006, 01:18: Message edited by: Huggyu2 ]

Stop the presses! The info above is not correct. Since 2000, the U-2 community has sent 5 pilots to the F-117. These are their backgrounds: - T-37 FAIP, C-141, U-2, F-117 - KC-135, T-38, U-2, F-117 - T-37 FAIP, C-5, U-2, F-117 - B-52, KC-10, U-2, F-117 - The last guy wasn't a Marine exchange. He was a Marine interservice transfer. Cobras, T-34, U-2, F-117 In the mid 90's, we sent "TMAT" Langland and "Egg" Smith to the Viper. TMAT was a T-38 FAIP and Egg was a C-21 driver. Both are great guys, and did well. Egg came back to the U-2 for a bit, and is now the DO of the 414th Red Flag Squadron, and flies as guest help with the 64th Aggressor Squadron. TMAT just retired out of Luke. That said, not many pilots pursue that out of Beale: most really like it here. Also: if you think that you're going to come to the U-2 as a stepping stone to a fighter, you need to get real. That was never the intent of these guys. And the thing about the U-2 is this: if you don't really WANT to fly it, you're going to hate it. [ 31. May 2006, 22:30: Message edited by: Huggyu2 ]

Any of you military pilots have any experience with having a hip replacement? Did you get back on status? Please drop me a line if you did.

I love this tradition! After landing in a 4-ship, I led them to dept end EOR, went to the SOF freq, checked them in and produced my coin. The SOF, who had SA, keyed the mic, and we could hear him tapping his coin on the SOF desk. Needless to say, I ended up buying the round, since everyone claimed a safety violation, since while digging for their coins, numerous items nearly fell out of their pockets (ear plugs, money, etc..) and FOD'd their cockpits. But it was worth it.

#1: SA and being a clear thinker

Johann, Agree. We've got plenty of warrior enlisted/officers in the USAF. We just need to put THEM into the leadership roles at these deployed locations. I'd take my squadron's survival NCO over any officer in the non-support group if it came to a deployment,... POW situation,... or game of kickball. Ditto for the E-3 we have sitting behind the duty desk. Warriors, both of them. [ 16. April 2006, 13:13: Message edited by: Huggyu2 ]

Buddy of mine is down the street at (base x) a few weeks back. He gets back from an 11 hour sortie, throws on a shirt with "VANS" written on it, along withthe Van's logo. Some unidentified dude stops him in the chow hall and tells him the logo is too large IAW Wing policy. Pilot informs him the logo is 2" tall (which ok), and that the word "VANS" is a "trademark", not a "logo", and he should learn the difference. They argue. Unidentified gent says the Chief wrote the new reg. Pilot tells him Chiefs don't write regs, offciers do. Finally, pilot asks this guy who he is, and he is a SMSgt. He runs off, cries to the Chief (who is watching from afar), and within 36 hours, the sq/cc is getting asked about it from the O-6 level. We have GOT to take back control of the USAF from these idiots --- officers and enlisted alike. These stories paint a sad picture of what is going on. Technique: when pulled aside by someone for some silly-ass infraction, get close, look them in the eye, and at the top of your lungs yell, "NOTED!". Very effective, I've found out. [ 16. April 2006, 13:17: Message edited by: HerkDerka ]