Clark Griswold

Next Gen Helicopter: https://www.popularmechanics.com/flight/g2988/bell-concept-helicopter/

I'll commit to IDK... seems tempting but is it analogous that the "Air" Force which currently has the majority of military space assets is not investing / exploiting space to its fullest extent for military purposes in power projection for the US as the US Army was judged to be immediately after WWII thus beginning our existence as a separate service? I would argue that Space is not to be separated from the Air Force but the Air Force needs to become the US Air & Space Force.

Agreed and those were interesting programs/ideas, good stuff either gets built or the LL get rolled into another program(s). Another pic of this concept: Would need to "smoothed" out and joined for one continuous edge from fuselage to wing tip.

Why the hell did the guy filming think the Class C accident happening right in front of him was less important than a routine takeoff?

Not to mention at probably 15% per flight hour cost and the logistical / security costs of parking a T-bird configured F-35s while out on the road. T-X T-birds would likely have a much lower logistical footprint. Bar napkin math but 8 pilots flying 750 hours a year (WAG) in T-bird F-35s @ $30k an hour comes to $180 million but in a T-X @ 5k an hour comes to 30 million, 150 million in savings, real money even for the AF.

Unclass footage released

Copy all It could do the job but damn that is one expensive show... not sure what the requirement per hour max cost for the T-X is but probably around 1/5th (or less) of what a 35 will cost per flight hour of rage.

This. Question (not just for CH) but has it ever been discussed to go back to 38s or ideally whichever jet is picked in the T-X competition? New jets, lower operational costs, all are two seaters, etc...

Copy that NG proposed design and article on 6 gen Fat and flat is the new hotness Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Add ons, more 5+ / 6 gen vaporware but plausible:

Early Gripen design:

Demo at Paris Air Show: Luke F-35s flying again also: https://www.airforcetimes.com/articles/luke-air-force-base-to-resume-f-35-flight-ops-after-oxygen-deprivation-incidents

Excellent. Someone at LM leaned the ABC's... Keep closing multi-year sales and keep dropping that price, particularly for the A model. Still want other partners (sts) and just my two cents, but coaxing Germany & Poland into the club are the Glen Gary leads. That could be another 150+ aircraft and would give the Ruskies something to worry about.

Yup, well said. The test pilot (Kurt Schroeder) said pretty much the same thing. Good technology but not needed. Presentation here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOmvrk3LPGc FSW research accomplished its goal, proved it was viable / gathered data, but FSW deployment became unnecessary due to advances in other areas / change in the operational environment. Still an interesting concept and with its low speed capability, surprised it was never proposed for carrier aircraft. But ask and Google sometimes provides interesting vaporware...

Yup Watched a presentation on FSW / X-29 from one of the retired test pilots - he addressed that a little and thought / said LO and FSW probably didn't work together Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Heaven has a new pledge... RIP Flounder.

FSW F-35 vaporware

How Trump Can Fix The F-35 Fighter Program Without Hurting American Warfighters, Workers Or Allies https://www.forbes.com/sites/lorenthompson/2016/12/20/how-trump-can-fix-the-f-35-fighter-program-without-hurting-american-warfighters-workers-or-allies/#35690e5a59d8 Take with a grain of salt but some decent suggestions for cost savings

Inevitable that some part of operations / combat become fully autonomous (once released for the mission). On the topic of concept RPAs / UAVs...vaporware but a reasonable extrapolation of the MQ-1/9/X series...

That is entirely possible... Probably won't affect the overall acquisition plan but it does provide a Plan B of sorts for other unforeseen problems, delays, financial difficulties, etc... Just my two cents but that is a Plan B- (delaying F-35A acquisition for SLEP'ed F-16s) - we've bet the farm on the F-35A, go all in and get this as right as it can be, we're over 110+ aircraft purchased with more on the way and paid for, barring some huge new flaw(s) discovered we are well past V1.

Low-Cost Attritable Aircraft (RPA) https://warisboring.com/the-u-s-air-forces-next-killer-drone-is-disposable/

Because it is much easier to accomplish in the near term and success begets success. About half the distance with a much more favorable intercept geometry, about 90% the same G, way less radiation from pseudo magnetic field, 4 times as much solar power available, etc... Crawl, Walk, Run. Crawl was the Moon Walk could be Venus Run is definitely Mars You could retrieve surface samples with an unmanned solution and retrieve from the HAVOC vehicle in atmosphere also, landing on any place Mars or the Moon adds so much cost, requirements and risk that it stifles just getting into deep space. First manned Mars missions, IMO, would be only Mars orbit and maybe Martian moon landings, like Apollo 8 (lunar only orbit) to keep practicing before we play.

Chinese moon landing strategy: How China's Planned Moon Landing Will Differ From America's Moon Landing Not planned till 2036 but this should kick us in the pants for the next big thing... which IMO should not be getting our asses to Mars but to Venus... HAVOC is the better option than shooting for Mars right now, we probably could pull this off in 10 years or so with focus, a shit load of money and a functioning political system to keep the government working towards this...

Precursor to modern AR... FICON Project and "Tom Tom" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FICON_project Pre-contact and contact are at about 4:30.

Concept Spaceplane https://bristolspaceplanes.com/projects/ascender/

Yup Article on the 'bat: https://www.airspacemag.com/history-of-flight/too-hot-to-handle-mcdonnell-xp-67-moonbat-67265978/