slackline

https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/security/trump-fires-head-u-s-election-cybersecurity-after-he-debunked-n1248063 Trump fired Chris Krebs via Twitter for having a spine... What a stand up president. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Love it, there's that class shining through. Clearly a mature, valued member of any squadron. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Relax, this is his game. You're just playing into his hands. I did for way too long. Not worth the time, I'm just trying to save yours. He'll continue to post stuff without explicitly saying what he really means, then attack you with all the immaturity he'll later accuse you of. Go back and look at his stuff. From time to time he says something intelligent, then attacks like a kid again. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

And not too mention the secretary of state in GA is a Republican. He's getting pressure from Rep lawmakers, to include L. Graham... Seems legit. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Somebody recommended it in here before, but I think everyone should have a mandatory watch of The Social Dilemma on Netflix. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You guys take him seriously? Talk about a vitriol fueled rant... He has some decent points, but when he's so incredibly angry, hard to take it seriously. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Tempted to "like" your post just for this alone. I would have had you said, "should just fall off into the ocean..." Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I gotta disagree with you on this one. The country is not evenly divided, and it is unhealthy for all the big cities to be making the legislation that governs the rural areas. Electoral college is the best prevention against one specific ideology running the country while alienating an entire half of the country. It's a good way to keep the masses from voting mob rules. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You'll never get answers. Give up. It's like the Biden laptop with all of its damning, foolproof evidence. Gonna change the election, smoking gun, etc. Mum's the word on it. They threw a hail Mary bluff with it, but in truth, had nothing. You'll never hear a mea culpa on it. They'll say, but the true media, the YouTube army says it's true! MSM wouldn't let it be published... Some other such garbage. Remember, I asked about this very outcome before the election. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Beyond awesome! Thanks for the share. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Is it just me, or does Uncle Rudy look like he got into Trump's spray tan? Maybe my phone's color is off... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

https://www.warren.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/H.I.G. McCarthy, & Staple Street letters.pdf Neat. You have anything saying those issues weren't addressed? Why would you believe a bunch of YouTubers, but not Trump appointed DHS people? Seems odd his own people would get in on the conspiracy to throw out their money ticket, don't you think? That just doesn't check... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Parading another YouTube warrior who is clearly qualified by his owning of a mic, a camera and a YT account. No wonder you guys are such ardent defenders of everything Trump does. If that is the bar you've set, then yeah, a conspiracy theory doesn't seem so crazy. You have let Trump and all of these other completely unqualified people lead you down a primrose path... It's just not true. It actually hurts to see so many highly educated people buying everything coming out from all these YT experts and anyone with a mic and a camera. They're clearly not doing this stuff to drive subscribers and views on their own channels, therefore making more money... What would be more entertaining and drive views? A conspiracy theory with drama saying the election was stolen, or the more likely eventuality that the election played out almost exactly how it was predicted? Early lead for Trump because he downplayed the Rona and pushed for in person voting, followed by massive waves of mail-in ballots leading to a flip of that lead...? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I was simply commenting on the fact that you constantly rail on and on about emotion being left out, so I found it odd you'd share something from someone who was so clearly emotional. I'd love for you to go back and point to my emotional arguments. Please. And you talk about using other sources to discredit things like it's bad... I'm taking a page out of Trump's playbook. That's where he lives. Zero facts, smear campaigns and attempts to discredit others that don't agree with him. At least every source I've used comes from reputable, highly informed people instead of consiracy quacks. Then when you don't like it, you say it's straight out of the communist playbook. Tell me that's not using emotional, baseless arguments... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It was really hard to miss... Took up the entire right side of the screen. All jokes aside, I miss easy stuff too from time to time. Yesterday, I didn't know seadog's /s thing meant sarcasm... We all miss stuff, no biggie, but I helped you out and pasted a pic of the rating...

I made it easy for you. Based on their score of 34.5/100, it's not worth taking the time to watch his videos. I tried, but he has an awful lot of something you deride in his voice, emotion. Couldn't finish it.

https://www.newsguardtech.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Daily-Wire-NewsGuard-Nutrition-Label.pdf Thoughts on Daily Wire? Garbage, untrustworthy stuff. Don't take my word for it, look at the people that rate all the websites out there. Here, use this as a guide: https://www.newsguardtech.com/election-misinformation-tracker/ Before you complain newsguardtech.com is evil MSM, here's their list of financial contributors: https://www.newsguardtech.com/about/our-investors/

https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/11/13/1012115/senior-us-election-official-trumps-misinformation-is-insulting/ This guy is the Trump nominee, unanimously confirmed by both sides of the aisle. He calls the presidents false claims of voter fraud and "stealing the election" laughable, insulting, dangerous and an embarrassment. Trump needs to do a better job picking his cronies if he's gonna make it in 2024. Not official, but pretty dang close... I'm sure this, too, is a communist thing to say... Right out of the playbook, right?

https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-cries-election-fraud-in-court-his-lawyers-dont-11605271267 Interesting read in the WSJ if you have access. BLUF: Not much to the claims when lawyers aren't willing to risk their licenses on unsubstantiated claims. Also, judges won't admit the garbage they try to include. I guess this must mean, only leftist, Democrat judges are hearing all of these cases. You have to admire the incredible planning that the Democrats put into stealing this election. Getting everyone on board with them to include Republicans (must be RINOs) to publicly say there is no fraud, actual government officials in charge of elections to say this was the safest election we've had with no evidence of tampering or fraud, and then all judges (with the exception of one in PA because the AG for sure overstepped her authority) to get on board with the conspiracy as well. Reminder, no results have been made official, and that's not what I'm saying here. Just pointing out that Trump cares about Trump. He couldn't care less about the damage he does to our system of government. The doubt he has sewn and that people have bought, hook, line and sinker is astounding. Our founding fathers are rolling in their graves over what this guy has done to the office... Don't worry, Trump-vision, or whatever he names it, will give all of you something to drool over for the next four years until he runs again. Hopefully, a real politician that cares about what happens to this country surfaces between then and now

Missed this last night. Good luck and let us know on the rest of the family!

https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/12/politics/donald-trump-fox-news-criticism/index.html https://www.forbes.com/sites/joewalsh/2020/11/12/trump-is-now-trashing-fox-news-heres-what-may-be-his-ulterior-motive/?sh=1e85ab1a6421 https://www.axios.com/trump-fox-news-digital-media-competitor-25afddee-144d-4820-8ed4-9eb0ffa42420.html https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8942185/Donald-Trump-planning-streaming-network-peel-Fox-viewers.html Look at that MSM conspiracy trying to make Trump look bad using his own words and stuff. How dare they! Trump is always above board. Most presidents do this, right? I hope that's not too communist of a sentiment for you...

My even-keeled response was what sent you over the edge? Ok. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Go back and read my post from earlier. I put a link to newguard that does a fairly good job of ID’ing news sites biases. They put a big fat warning on OAN because it is incredibly one-sided. I give CNN, etc the smallest amount more of credibilty than I do Fox. I read them all though because even a blind squirrel finds a nut sometimes. Guardian, don’t put words in my mouth. The View, if it’s the show I’m thinking of is an entertainment show with narcissistic women that think they know everything. I’ve no clue where you’re getting that from. A year ago, I would have said it’s a very small percentage, but the ideas people have been espousing lately make me doubt that percentage is that small. Especially if you look at the Trump rally ilk, not the most inspiring group of people out there. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Saying it’s worked 45 times in the past isn’t the same as saying it cannot go wrong now. I didn’t say it could never go wrong. Simply stated that the burden of evidence to prove it was broken is on those claiming it is. Of course it could go wrong. Possible and probable are two different animals however. Absolutely saying they both suck as potential presidents. Well, we have 4 years of proof that one of them cannot hack it without being one of the most offensive people ever. I guess if Biden wins when the dust settles we’ll see if he’s better or worse. I’m willing to take my chances on him though... Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

No offense, but some of those millions of people agreeing with you also happen to embrace all sorts of other incredibly wild conspiracies. If shady lawyers like that David Kallman guy, or OAN videos and Fox News are your best evidence, forgive the rest of us for not jumping up to believe him. The reason everyone keeps saying it is because you literally just said no one’s given you any evidence as to why the other 72M people should believe the system isn’t broken. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk