Banzai
-
Posts
140 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Blogs
Downloads
Wiki
Everything posted by Banzai
-
-
Narrator: “In this forum, you can watch active and retired military officers who have sworn an oath to the constitution and American institutions pontificate that the 5th/14th amendments and decades of legal precedent around them are okay to be ignored if it’s in the interest of their political goals. Fascinating!” “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/426/67 “It is true that aliens who have once passed through our gates, even illegally, may be expelled only after proceedings conforming to traditional standards of fairness encompassed in due process of law.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/345/206 It’s not about supporting or not supporting MS-13 gang members - you guys are presenting an entirely false dilemma. It’s about supporting the constitutional right to due process. Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
-
Peoples lives are being shattered and destroyed by a mere allegation. Some are true and some are false. Some are old and some are new. There is no recovery for someone falsely accused - life and career are gone. Is there no such thing any longer as Due Process?
-
Nah, I saw how this forum reacted to bureaucrats releasing timing, targets, and assets within an unclassified signal chain. The basis of judgment has been primarily first which party does the accused wrong doer belong to.
-
I can’t wait to see the trades of congressman and folks in the administration. Must be reported by May 15. Equally excited to see this forum explain how it isn’t insider trading and is somehow not only ethical but also logical and obviously the right thing to do.
-
https://amp.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3306066/eu-leaders-plan-trip-beijing-july-summit-xi-jinping If true, we’re gonna get to test your guys’s theories about how soft power and globalization are old news! The cracks are starting to form in the world order. But at least some insiders and billionaires are making money off dumps and pumps while we go down. Transfer that wealth!
-
Nice!
-
1912 political cartoons are back in vogue.
-
And after today?
-
You said trillions. 2 of your sources are 1-2 billion and one was apple. The difference between 1-2 billion and 1 trillion dollars? About a trillion dollars. This is nothing. To apple, if you didn’t know, they do this every presidency to gain favor with the public. They promised 430 billion in 2021 and 350 billion in 2018 that, yep, never materialized: 2021: https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2021/04/apple-commits-430-billion-in-us-investments-over-five-years 2018: https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2018/01/apple-accelerates-us-investment-and-job-creation/ The TRILLIONS in investments are not existent. You’re buying in to either Fox propaganda (that says there are 5T of new investments with no source), or you’re looking to find something that fits your worldview and not question it. I sincerely hope companies do, I really do, but it’s ridiculous to say they are right now.
-
Go with a SINGLE credible source on the investments. A SINGLE one.
-
Also I’m not a democrat, what is “my party” you speak of?
-
Why?
-
When I posted it, it was correct. Go ahead and prove that their first story on it wasn’t at 10 PM. To your question, are you trying to tell us something about yourself? Or do you just sit at home and fume about people’s genitalia in your free time? The talk radio mind rot gotchu bad bb.
-
https://www.sacbee.com/news/nation-world/national/article303655371.html Turns out that even when you reduce your tariffs to 0, the current US is so unpredictable that that is not enough. There is literally no proof that what you said will mean anything - just as your Vietnam point was pointless. If it’s about deficits, there’s nothing we can do but enjoy the depression.
-
Yeah, I’m sure you are aware that Vietnam right now has an effective tariff rate of about 1%, right? Huge winning getting that reduced. You are one of the biggest propaganda echo chamber enjoyers. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/tm.tax.mrch.wm.ar.zs?locations=VN
-
You guys think it’s odd that FoxNews doesn’t have a single story on the market and removed their stock ticker? Or is that how fair and balanced news looks?
-
@BashiChuni @Boomer6 What do you not like about this? The tariff rates published by the White House are literally the trade deficit ratios (with a minimum blanket rate). I find it especially hilarious that because of this blanket simple math, they are instituting tariffs on places like uninhabited islands (Heard and McDonald island) and islands which are literally only inhabited by US/UK military personnel (Diego Garcia) 😂 Drove past a few of these bad boys a couple weeks ago, and you’ve gotta admit, stock prices are low. Promise made, promise kept!
-
You can retract your statement anyways. Bad take and you know it. Especially bad coming from an alleged combat aviator; feel sad to what you’re doing to your credibility. It was revealed that F-18s, tomahawks, and MQ-9s were tasked to strike the houthis “top missile guy” at an exact time. The Houthis have SA-6s and SA-3s and have shot down over a dozen of our aircraft. There is clearly risk. Recommend to rebuild you don’t go too deep down the talk radio path you’re flirting with and get back to studying. I’d start with what the classification of these things are: - Movement of ammunition, aircraft, personnel, units, or comm equipment. - Date and time mission/operations begin - Time lines/schedules There are some FOIAd SCGs. DYOR.
-
I think it’s safe to say I don’t believe that.
-
I do not recall the definition of classified information. But I am glad that she said that there was no classified information. I look forward to having the SSCI validate her statement and reassure the public. https://thehill.com/homenews/media/5212821-atlantic-editor-suggests-hes-open-to-sharing-hegseths-full-war-plans-texts-publicly/
-
I do not remember and do not recall.
-
How about this, let’s take a hypothetical stance that there is totally not enough evidence to believe this is anything other than a fake news smear job. If it comes out as true - which the truth will come out when the reporter is called to testify - will you oppose and denounce the actions taken if targets and timing and/or other classified information were shared?
-
I just want to confirm you stance. Do you believe that these screenshots are fake? Followed by Or do you believe those are true? What do you think about the national security council saying they appear to be authentic? If you believe they are true then is your belief that in between these texts in this text chain they did not share information on the strikes - and that was entirely fabricated? Do you think it’s possible that the reporter is being truthful in intentionally not sharing what he thinks is classified information? If it is true, do you think he should openly share what he believes is classified information? Or do you think if he believes that it is classified that he should not put it out there? Is your stance that, although much of what was stated by the reporter is backed up by verifiable evidence, that this portion of his article is fake news? If so, what makes you think that?
