Jump to content

SurelySerious

Supreme User
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,529

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    43

 Content Type 

Everything posted by SurelySerious

  1. SurelySerious
    This will be Type 4 control... bring the rain.
  2. SurelySerious
    Yep, it took them two years to get the A-12 flying Mach 3+ at 69,000 ft, but in 26 years they haven't been able to get the environmental system in the F-22 to work.
  3. SurelySerious
    Whether it's pilots in the airplane or not, you still have the airplane, maintenance, and fuel roughly the same... which are orders of magnitude bigger cost than the pilots. What you will probably add in, and which maybe you haven't considered, is some amount of satellite bandwith, which isn't cheap.
  4. SurelySerious
    Eh.
  5. SurelySerious
    Hah, speaking of apologies... labeled "Obama's Afghan mission statement"
  6. SurelySerious
    Not if terrorists were using them to pass information. In that case, feel free to dispose of them as needed.
  7. SurelySerious
    They must have missed the 100% shred policy CBT.
  8. SurelySerious
  9. SurelySerious
    For those of you with ambitions beyond the squadron: "'Million Mustache March' Planned for April to encourage growth of facial hair (and the economy)" April 1, Washington, D.C.
  10. SurelySerious
  11. SurelySerious
    Waiting for Airbus' rebuttal flight: Maybe they should just do "POS."
  12. SurelySerious
    Male Astronauts Return With Eye Problems Not really Glaucoma related, but an interesting issue.
  13. SurelySerious
    Masking the real radar signature?
  14. SurelySerious
    At Nellis the other night: some retard on the well-lit single-purpose running track wearing a reflective belt. I'm sorry, were you confusing CAOC-N with the CAOC? Ugh.
  15. SurelySerious
    2012 ACSCL. Anyone with insight on why Proclear is no longer an approved lens? It disappeared form the 2011 list without explanation in the memo. 2012_ACSCLP_Approved_list.pdf 2012_ACSCLP_signed_memo.pdf
  16. SurelySerious
    What's wrong with that? You simply stated a goal. If they infer something such as, "I hate everyone here, and this mission sucks so I want out," I doubt any sugar coating is going to help.
  17. SurelySerious
    She doesn't seem to be shy about it, and sounds like she has a market cornered if she needs career options.
  18. SurelySerious
    Shack.
  19. SurelySerious
    If it's the active, or even better powered passive (emits when interrogated) kind, then you're right, EMCON would be easy
  20. SurelySerious
    That sucks, they can get it to read a passing vehicle on a highway, but not an airplane sitting feet away for a couple minutes. Wonder if they tried a Bluetooth based device; should still be small, light, and cheap.
  21. SurelySerious
    Should be pretty easy to do some radar intercepts with that big radar up front.
  22. SurelySerious
    Russia "slams" U.S. over human rights... Act surprised, deny, deny, deny, counter accuse.
  23. SurelySerious
    If only there were a place with every AFI in electronic format.
  24. SurelySerious
    For OOD: This guy.
  25. SurelySerious
    No, back to the vault; always something to learn.
×
×
  • Create New...