Day Man
-
Posts
1,666 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
46
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Blogs
Downloads
Wiki
Posts posted by Day Man
-
-
🌮 for SA
-
6 hours ago, FLEA said:
Well if your choice is starving or getting the vaccine you aren't really free to make a choice are you?
the choice is to be employed there or not, which you are definitely free to make.
-
10 minutes ago, joe1234 said:
It'll be interesting to see how forthright these freedom-loving patriots are when their income is threatened.
-
1
-
1
-
-
quit spamming multiple forums with this
-
21 minutes ago, Pooter said:
They are basing it on political narrative.
Of 20/51 worst states (& DC), Trump won 17. The 3 he lost (Nevada, Arizona, & Georgia) had a combined margin of 2.9%. This is odd to me as the vaccines were developed mostly under his administration.
https://www.politico.com/2020-election/results/president/
-
1
-
2
-
-
-
1
-
2
-
1
-
-
14 hours ago, Guardian said:
I would rather kids learn there is a theory that everything was potentially created by a loving God and the science behind it
lol, I would love to see that "science"...
and if you're ok with teaching that "theory", what's wrong with teaching other theories?
-
1
-
-
25 minutes ago, Fast_N_Low135 said:
Are we talking 757-200 wife body jets or A380 wife body jets? There’s a big difference between the two and need to know where your standards lie.
built for speed or comfort?
-
2
-
2
-
-
On 5/12/2021 at 5:24 PM, Prosuper said:
Psalm 139:13-16
For you formed my inward parts; you knitted me together in my mother's womb. I praise you, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made. Wonderful are your works; my soul knows it very well. My frame was not hidden from you, when I was being made in secret, intricately woven in the depths of the earth. Your eyes saw my unformed substance; in your book were written, every one of them, the days that were formed for me, when as yet there was none of them.
that's great, but in the same way you probably don't base your life on lord of the rings books, a good amount of us consider the bible/any religious text to be complete fiction. 🍻
if you want to life your life based on those principles, have at it.
-
2
-
-
13 minutes ago, bfargin said:
Now you're talking complete shit. there is universal agreement by medical and scientific communities that human life is present the moment of conception. The only discussion might be the term "person". You might not like that fact anymore than I like the idea that "person"hood can be debated, but its established fact.
cool. again, please provide a (valid) reference.
-
15 minutes ago, 1:1:1 said:
You're grasping at straws. There are logically consistent arguments for abortion but you choose not to use those. A zygote is a living organism with unique, human DNA.
we're discussing whether it's considered 'living'...your viewpoint isn't as universally accepted despite how much you want it to be.
-
21 minutes ago, Lord Ratner said:
So you have a counter survey of biologists or scientists to cite?
not gonna bother...a survey is fallible. is NASA's stance not valid enough for a counterpoint?
-
13 hours ago, 1:1:1 said:
"As the usable responses began to come in, I found that 5,337 biologists (96%) affirmed that a human’s life begins at fertilization, with 240 (4%) rejecting that view. The majority of the sample identified as liberal (89%), pro-choice (85%) and non-religious (63%). In the case of Americans who expressed party preference, the majority identified as Democrats (92%)."
the author of that opinion article couldn't be biased...
Quotehttps://www.princeton.edu/~prolife/articles/embryoquotes2.html
"The following references illustrate the fact that a new human embryo, the starting point for a human life, comes into existence with the formation of the one-celled zygote"
sorry, a collection of random quotes doesn't mean shit just because it has 'princeton.edu' in the URL
-
1
-
1
-
-
7 hours ago, bfargin said:
We have a definition of human life according to science and there really is no debate there,
can you please provide a reference for this?
-
11 hours ago, Kiloalpha said:
Pretty simple. He’s using a parallel example of Mars to show the error in your/society’s whimsical definition of “life.”
you should let the folks at NASA know you figured it out!
QuoteThe big question – Is there life beyond Earth? – comes with an ironic asterisk: we don't really have a universally accepted definition of life itself.
https://exoplanets.nasa.gov/search-for-life/can-we-find-life/
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, TreeA10 said:
My apologies for the thread derailment. I made no mention of an egg fertilized, fried, or scrambled. I just said a single or multicellular organism. It's a simple question.
Rog...they say they found life/evidence of life. What's your point?
-
thread to stop the creep from the presidential thread.
-
22 minutes ago, TreeA10 said:
It's a very simple question and I'm not sure what more clarification I could add. The discovery of a single cell or multi-cell organism on another planet would be defined by scientists as?
I'm inferring (again) you posit this regarding 'life' on another planet equating a fertilized egg as being alive? is that correct?
edit: this is a huge derailment from the current thread...this probably needs its own (never-ending) thread to continue 🍻
-
5 hours ago, TreeA10 said:
If the mars rover had the capability and it found a single cell organism or, more impressively, a multicell organism on that distant planet, all the scientists on this planet would say we have discovered what? A) A non-viable mass. B) an inconvenience C) life.
can you clarify what you mean here?
-
30 minutes ago, jazzdude said:
1- The state isn't making that decision to abort a pregnancy, typically it's the mother. If we were looking at state-directed abortion or sterilization, then you have a point here, but that's not the case
31 minutes ago, jazzdude said:So I'd rather defer the choice from government to the individual, to make the choice that is right for them, rather than have the government dictate what to do.
i was trying to say these things without writing a book...thanks.
-
1
-
-
3 hours ago, Guardian said:
I’ve read your statement several times. I don’t understand your point alone or as related to the quote you are quoting. Could you please explain what you mean?Sure. Abortion is an individual decision. @bfargin quoted the constitution and bolded 'life' implying it referred to abortion. I highlighted "nor shall any state" because it doesn't apply to an individuals actions, only the state.
1 hour ago, bfargin said:I'm pretty sure he doesn't even know what he meant. I left any "religious belief" out of everything I wrote, and last time I checked a "person" is an individual.
🤨
6 hours ago, bfargin said:The Constitution, science, logic, and religion all agree on abortion.
Science and logic usually don't agree with religion on anything. Let me know if I incorrectly inferred what you were saying (that the constitution, science, logic, and reason are all against abortion).
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, bfargin said:
"No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.")
This has nothing to do with individual choices. Also, your religious beliefs are irrelevant.
-
1
-
-
@BroncoEN remembering all the illegal direct-to-fixes he did
-
5
-
2
-
-
1 minute ago, Bode said:
Threw this in to the google and no returns. Details?
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkShaw Viper last summer...AIB link is in that thread, but:
"Evidence also indicates the MP was not fully engaged on the challenges of flying a night instrument approach due to his unsuccessful attempt to conduct his first ever AAR at night, which is not allowed by Air Force regulations."
Aviation Continuation Pay (ACP - The Bonus)
in General Discussion
Posted
i would enjoy some serious schadenfreude at the AF's expense, but the national security implications are worrying.