Jump to content

fire4effect

Supreme User
  • Posts

    430
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by fire4effect

  1. 19 hours ago, fire4effect said:

    Interesting we are having this conversation in the first place. But given who we have running for the office of POTUS on  both sides not really surprising. What would really be interesting would be the reaction of the Praetorian Guard (AKA Secret Service)....4000 or so strong? or say Brigade size.....who are supposed to be apolitical to the extreme....many of whom are former military....would they defend POTUS in a relevant scenario or walk....I understand that they're recruiting fewer than they are losing.......the times we live in....

     

    18 hours ago, ihtfp06 said:

    Put....down....the....bottle....

    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    Fair assumption.....meant it more tongue in cheek....should have been clearer......I admit that I am more than a little surprised that there is actually a thread seriously discussing a potential military role in a domestic civil war on a mainstream forum such as Baseops....that is what I was referring to the "times we live in"  Now..........where is that rum and coke?:drinking:

  2. Interesting we are having this conversation in the first place. But given who we have running for the office of POTUS on  both sides not really surprising. What would really be interesting would be the reaction of the Praetorian Guard (AKA Secret Service)....4000 or so strong? or say Brigade size.....who are supposed to be apolitical to the extreme....many of whom are former military....would they defend POTUS in a relevant scenario or walk....I understand that they're recruiting fewer than they are losing.......the times we live in....

  3. Anybody know what the class A mishap rate is for the F-18 for say the last 10 years? Sounds eerily similar to the Beaufort  SC crash of the Blue Angel's #6 in 2007. Not to mention a couple of mishaps that were dual engine failures with ground fatalities. So much for dual engine redundancy.

  4. On ‎12‎/‎10‎/‎2015 at 7:43 AM, polcat said:

    AFSAS is at https://afsas.af.mil. You can also search for AFSAS in the AF Portal. I just signed up for an account.

    And they denied my access to mishaps since I'm not a safety officer. Go figure.

    I talked to a guy at the safety center in the not too distant past and the impression I got was they are trying to crack down/control release of sensitive information to essentially safety coded personnel. Apparently too much finds its way into the  wild......shocked face.. Of course depending on if any "controversial" information that may be found in any SIB, especially if it relates to any potential human error seems to eventually come out.....I too am curious when/where the AIB will be released  so all sectors of aviation may benefit.

  5. 19 hours ago, Jaded said:

    Wow, I knew it was bad, but didn't think it was that bad.

    I cannot imagine what it would feel like to be stop lossed in a job you hate. 

    I knew lots in the 2005-2008 and beyond time frame....one troop I know was accepted and very shortly headed to law school just as the stop loss came down...he was a less than happy troop on that whole OIF deployment. I understand he eventually made it to law school but he was typical of a lot of lives that got derailed. Worst of all the ones who had similar plans but their last stop was Section 60 at Arlington..........just trying to lend a little perspective

  6. I definitely agree it's all about the money and power (the vast majority of politics is), but I disagree that anything with regards to this issue will change with the next administration.  The country is not the same as it was 15 years ago, much less what it was 35 years ago.  Also, the Middle East is losing its place when it comes to importance in the world...so not not only has our country changed, but the world, the world economy, etc has changed.  

    Can't argue the point we're a different world/country economically/geopolitically and in 1980 our strongest response from the Democratic administration at the time to the invasion of Afghanistan was to boycott the Olympics....on a side note it was just reported that a potentially large untapped oil field was found in Israel to add a new wrinkle...but if Donald Trump somehow gets elected there's no telling how he would react to a Russian provocation......though we all hope that the realities of being president as opposed to running for president would be assessed rationally.....(that's where our senior military leadership owes POTUS  whomever it is the unvarnished truth)............Sunni/Shia animosity has only grown since we were all spending our many long deployments in Iraq and ISIS certainly hasn't helped the animosity. Would the Shiites from Iran and Iraq like to dominate Saudi Arabia/Suez Canal/Eastern Mediterranean/Israel etc...by actual or implied threat of force and be happy to let Russia provide the muscle? That to me is scary proposition.

  7. All about the money........very little about Assad specifically....control Syria you wield a lot power over the world oil supply.......and global oil prices.....Putin knows what he has with our current administration and how far he can push.......in a year not so much....Afghanistan 1979 all over again. What's to stop them from pushing east and south once they own Syria 

  8. Supposedly the FAA will release the certification requirement for RPA operators in the civilian world soon (relatively speaking). Suggestions range from a RPA specific very basic training type certificate up to a Commercial/Instrument ticket. In the fall the FAA made it clear for those of us with a pilot certificate we could be putting it in jeopardy if we operate a model aircraft or other RPA contrary to the FARs. Obviously making sure they keep current certificated pilots on a short leash until the complete regulatory picture is sorted out. I'm pretty sure the requirements will be designed to reflect a size/performance distinction on the various systems when it's all said and done.

    Especially for the smaller systems that anyone can buy and operate out of their backyard .....I think the FAA will have a hard time policing them without a license requirement of some kind in place.....even so enforcement could require a lot of manpower

    Ultimate take away is the certificate required will determine pay scales over the long haul

  9. How much get's taken in taxes?.........I can't remember a time the government didn't get a big chunk back right off the top ...Honestly I'm surprised they aren't imposing a stop loss as so many suggested would happen some time ago. Can't get much cheaper than that.....

    On another note I was at a college flight school a while back and talking to some of the kids learning to fly (not in any official capacity just to be clear) about the military and I was surprised that at least some wouldn't consider it because they heard that they might get put in the RPA world instead of a manned airframe. Wanted nothing to do with it as they aspired to be an airline pilot....fair enough....Of course I did try to explain a LOT of troops are still around because of RPAs........Hope I made them at least do some hard thinking.

  10. I'm sure the movie will be appropriately cheesy but I would have absolutely no qualms whatsoever putting a Hellfire on the bad guy's head via RPA. Having had encounters with various forms of insurgent ordnance while in far away places I have no sympathy for any of them...especially ISIS. Warfare is as much about getting in the enemies head.....IEDs, mortars, rockets.....can't shoot back at them.....and that I can assure you is frustrating.....bad guys know it....well guess what ISIS...we're giving you a taste of you're own medicine.....now you're getting "IEDs" back...via air mail. This a way to get in the bad guy's head for a change. Having spoken to some less than respectable types in the past I know it does. Thanks to all you guy's in the RPA world...long hours and all...hit'em again

    • Upvote 2
  11. http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/navys-futuristic-laser-weapon-action/story?id=27507405

    I've seen a lot of comments on lasers shooting down missiles, artillery projectiles, and uavs.....very little about manned aircraft from the surface.....what's concerning is the vulnerability of manned aircraft especially when our adversaries figure out (steal) the technology. The size of the power supply required for a given laser output seems to currently favor surface based systems.

  12. Helping the Iraqis could be ok, but advise and assist only. The only risk to US forces should be existing in the country, very low key, low cost in both people and dollars. The face on all operations needs to be Iraqi, as long as the integration with the country team is tight and leadership is willing to call the baby ugly early it could be successful.

    To follow on to Helodude's point, we can't and shouldn't do it for them, they need to step up. We can be there to provide some advice, but it has got to be their effort and skin in the game. This is going to be the future of US efforts abroad, limited means, limited ways, and limited ends. The last point is what needs to change in the American psyche, what can we actually achieve, our ends need to be limited. We can't make Iraq a mini America, it will be ######ed up for a very long time. The most we can hope for is help them achieve a semi-stable vector to something better, and help them with the tools to fight to maintain that vector. But they have to do that fighting or it isn't actually worth anything.

    In other words, sure we'll help a little, but if you ###### it up we're more than willing to let you lie in the bed you make.

    I did the advising gig too. Painful process though to watch. With the water treatment plant (provided most of water for Baghdad and a frequent insurgent target) at Tarmya North of Taji most of the effort our AO was directed at protecting that piece of infrastructure and the pumping stations coming from it......As for anything American...well lets just say during some down time one evening Iraqi and American officers watched Deuce Bigelow Male Gigolo on a laptop....fine juvenile humor transcending cultures :thumbsup: But I digress.....They've come a LONG way from barely able to keep the water flowing to where they are now and they'll have to continue to figure out they way ahead for themselves. If we can provide something of relatively low cost/risk to us AND it's a force multiplier beyond their current capabilities I don't have a problem.

    On the subject of Afghanistan...having returned not long ago from that garden spot.....that place will be up for grabs depending on how much of a residual coalition force is left behind with most of the country being for the most part staying under Afghan Government control with areas of heavy Taliban influence in pockets of the East and South for some time to come....My 0.02

  13. I think they lengthened Taji's runway after I left that gem of a place several years ago...but according to this, I think the Reaper needs a little bit longer of a runway. Then again, what do I know...and besides, what's a 'runway'?

    I say allow the Iraqis to take care of their own country. They're more than capable now, if they truly want to make it better.

    Yep I couldn't remember Taji's runway length.....Balad would be better........I just like the thought of a relatively low risk way to keep killing insurgents a very long way from our shores. Having talked to a few less than respectable types from that area a long time ago the bad guy's definitely fear UAVs and Hellfires..... I knew Iraqis were using 208s with Hellfires but admittedly I can't speak to which is more effective.

    • Upvote 1
  14. Having spent more than my fair share of time on the ground in that hell hole, I say stack Taji with as many Preds/Reapers and Hellfires as they can fit and go to town on the SOBs. Let them take Falluja/Ramadi and the surrounding areas so they're drawn out into the open and kill them in easier to hit clusters........as for ground troops......beyond some SOF troops....no way

    • Upvote 1
  15. I was surprised during my USAFE tour that the French and Belgians still care as much as they do. Maybe not the Paris-types, but all the little towns were very reverent to their local monuments and cemetaries. Very humbling.

    On the same trip to Normandy they met some residents of Sainte-Mere-Eglise and the locals were surprised that John Steele (the American Paratrooper that landed on the church steeple) was not a household name in the U.S. I admit I didn't remember his name either until they told me. They French locals in Normandy sure remember.

×
×
  • Create New...