Lawman

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Stumbled upon this randomly and while I’m not a big shotgun guy I know a lot of people that slug hunt. If you don’t want to sit through the whole video just jump to about the 16min mark where they shoot the ballistic gel. These might be the most wickedly destructive round I’ve ever seen when thinking about the potential wounding capacity to a target. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

No you asked a loaded question (which we could all see coming) and then implied if that standard of “victory” can’t be achieved we should give up now and force the Ukrainians to capitulate. And another thing, no leader is going to publicly proclaim victory is short of an ultimate end goal, doing so would be suicidal to any negotiation. Plus this isn’t a new thing for Ukraine, they’ve been fighting to get their land back since it was annexed illegally, we just widely didn’t pay attention until 2022. If you think there isn’t a real scenario currently playing out where outcomes like Crimea is no longer under Russian control you are paying attention to the wrong talking heads in the info space. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No now you’re moving goal posts. If they can’t have it all back it’s not a win therefore we shouldn’t help them “lose.” And what’s more you only want to evaluate based off the last 6 months of Russian “success” as some would misrepresent it given how little it has achieved, its costs, and the restrictions we placed on the Ukrainians. That’s absolutely ludicrous given that they’ve retaken ground, sit in a position where Crimea is becoming an untenable position for the Russians to maintain combat forces, and have only very recently been given tools necessary for shaping actions necessary to precede any offensive action like taking back territory. And what does it achieve? Despite the sapping of any Russian combat power necessary for future aggression and rebuilding our own deficient military supply structure? Well there is the fact that Ukraine is positioned on the southern flank and effectively the most powerful ground force in a Europe, acting as a check against future Russian aggression to take the Baltics (which Putin has stated his intent towards). Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Russia isn’t “advancing.” And while we are at it, Ukraine has taken back and is holding ground they didn’t have this last January. There is a mutual exchange of tactical positions to which one side is spending exorbitantly more human capital and resources to achieve. Again, if people don’t know what a mobile defense is, or understand concepts as to why Ukraine adopted the tactics it did for the last six months, or pretend that our decision to withhold combat aid or restrict use of Corps/Division depth shaping systems like ATACM… yeah the fact Russia didnt make it the Dnieper yet along its Luhansk axis or dislodge the Ukrainians on their side of it says a lot. The Russians enjoy a fire power and manpower advantage, are attacking a non static defense, and still can’t achieve a breakthrough, not that they would be able to exploit one because of the depletion of their mechanized forces (also why you are seeing artillery tied with human wave tactics). Russia isn’t “winning” anything. That’s a misrepresentation of the realities of ground combat that you and others seem to want to avoid to advance this idea that we need to force the Ukrainians to just accept the new reality and use our hand at the spigot to turn off their means to fight a war effectively. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Crimea is currently under effective siege. If it wasn’t the Russian Black Sea fleet would still be in harbor there and the biggest airfield on the Island wouldn’t have spent the last several days on fire. If this ends at the tables as all wars have, negotiation positions will make all the impact in what final terms are. The lunacy is people like Gearhog demanding that there is some kind of righteousness in the west abandoning Ukraine to its self like it can then enter those negotiations with any kind of leg to stand on. Germany tried that in WWI with the allies basically saying “sign this or else” and the inability to continue fighting. They were done because means = 0. Russia would simply demand absurd amounts and swallow the largest land mass in Europe through ineptness by the west, and then look at the Baltics (which Putin thinks are his by right) like “who is really gonna stop me.” We should cease our more active efforts of support only after hostilities have ended, not as some sort threat of withholding it to beat the peace out of the a Ukrainians. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Russia has neither the demonstrated competency nor the troop trained and equipped to actual attempt a war of maneuver. Again, since you’re apparently so smart on the subject of the ground domain why don’t you tell me and the wider room why Ukraine actively chose to execute a mobile defense and what that would grant them in producing actual strategic effect for the hundreds to at most single digit kilometer gains in a country the size of Texas. Be sure to factor in that part where the Russians enjoy a 10 to 1 fires ratio advantage because we spent 6 months dicking away time in Congress for the sake of idiots like Greene. Again according to you Ukraine is now “losing the war.” At the current pace of the Russian Army they will be “losing the war” until some time in 2036. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Capacity to make war is Will x Means, with successful victory being chosen by the capitulation of whichever side zero’s out in that math. That’s been the same for centuries. The temporary matter of Position means nothing, by your conflict calculus Germany was “winning” WWI…… all the way up to the point it lost. Same could be said for the Revolutionary war. At no point does the Russian movement on the ground (especially given the exchange they’ve given for it) change the equation to that especially since from your previous posts you don’t understand mobile defense or why a ground force would chose to trade strategic depth for some other factor. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Because people actually familiar with ground warfare are aware of the magnitudes of higher difficulty in conducting offense vs conducting defense. And also because most of the assets that one would use to conduct and exploit a breach weren’t given to them until later in the summer thanks largely to objections by Germany. Artillery shells don’t cross minefields for you. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I like how over an 800km front they’ve taken to the choice of saying “square kilometers seized” and other such nonsense to try and doomsday the plight of the Ukrainians. The Russians can literally see the line of departure their offensives started from in their current positions after 6 months and this is the end of the world. Imagine what they’d have “achieved” had the Ukrainians actually had the back supply of shells to spend on them. “Da! 86 square KM seized this week for our glorious soldiers! Only 600,000 to go! Onward to victory comrades.” Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I mean they made that same mistake during early Covid. “It’s decimating Italy” sounds impressive to anyone who hasn’t been to Italy. That’s a “first world country” in name only with a geriatric population. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I’ve noticed a frequency and proximity of gun shows having a directly negative experience on the “don’t be a dumbass” standard. The indoor range I used to frequent in college would constantly get people straight in from the county fair grounds with something stupid in hand by somebody who’s gun ownership is being measured in minutes. Then you’re getting flagged by some jackass and his buddies or watching somebody blast away at the backstop with steel core in a Mosin still packed with grease. Introduce kids and teens to guns while they still have dads/uncles in their life so they don’t turn into these jackasses. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You basically get two options: Move somewhere that it’s always cold so you can pretty much use anything Or Adopt a clothing style inflexible to fashion change for 15 years…. Wait for flannel to come back around…. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The ATFs actions in an enforcement capacity should be removed or severely curtailed. Look we don’t have Treasury agents doing Elliot Ness bootlegger raids anymore, we don’t have other agency groups with their own group of local Joe door kickers taking down guys doing illicit internet stuff. IRS doesn’t conduct raids, they accompany them. The ATF should have its nuts removed and outsource that action to local and federal law enforcement which hasn’t shown its self to be collectively up its own ass. There is no reason the FBI field offices and local departments couldn’t fill that capacity and it would foster better inter agency cooperation. They can still be armed in the normal accomplishment of their duties, same way the crime scene guys all are, but it’s for an understand of protection or exigent circumstances not to go conducting raids because they want to moonlight as SWAT. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

There is a huge push in Army aviation to start sending more people to WTI and the weapons course just because we understand the deficiency in the sort of institutional knowledge stovepiped of training. The debrief/AAR process at the weapons course alone was eye opening to the senior leaders we had sit through it. Broad perspective of experience is critical from us slipping back to a pre joint military which I would largely say looking at our procurement strategies we are already doing. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes it’s the Russians that are gonna tell you the real truth. You know you are literally a vignette characature we have to do annual training on for insider threat? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The show feels like a form of sleep hypnosis. I don’t understand how my full cocaine and redbull rockstar energy child can somehow sit still for something with this pace. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I didn’t tell you not to watch wrestling I told you it was fake. You somehow seem to take that as “well I can’t know unless I watch it” which is an absolutely preposterous bit of logic you’ve committed yourself too. Same is true for a bunch of Russian hacks with a long history of BS statements being presented by one of our more flamboyantly in the bag characters as “the real story on the ground.” Two of us knew how bogus that claim was, we provided you with easy verifiable examples of it… but you, like a child, need to stick the key in the wall socket to find out it will in fact be a negative experience for you. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Do you need to watch professional wrestling to know it’s fake, or has enough been demonstrated to meet the expected threshold to dismiss the idea it’s real? At this point you just want to be contrarian to any evidence presented about these guys and their show and you’ve ignored all of it or dismissed it as “that doesn’t count because…” Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I bring him up because no rational person would attempt to disprove his demonstrated lack of integrity (the the point of openly defending himself in court saying so) or defend the concept we need to listen to his content with any reasonable expectation of truth. What an irrational person would do is take a similarly set of highly compromised individuals hosting a podcast which spends its content selling fabricated stories and negative narratives of the west and NATO as somehow worthy of the time to spend to mince through said content in search of any kind of truth. You aren’t nuanced, you’re just obtuse. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It’s this or pay attention to Daniel Tiger. Though I think that show would give as good a ground intelligence summary as two hacks telling us Ukraine is done for and all the worlds ills are the fault of the west and NATO. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I can assure you even empty a full frame plastic pistol will effectively pistol-whip somebody if that’s what you’re down to. Polymers don’t quick give the way an eye socket does. And the barrel is great for an in hand smash grip. Doesn’t feel as natural as a full frame metal or revolver, but it’s still way harder than your fist. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

No we all get it you’re a troll. You just like to be a more sophisticated one than our regular troll. I just like pointing out the dubious guests and theories by your new favorite podcast to champion because anybody taking your advise to give service to them is gonna waste their time figuring that out first hand. It’s like watching you defend Tucker as still being needed to be listened too seriously. That’s a Rogan episode you can definitely skip. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Man 1398 more podcasts before you can exercise any level of critical thinking on the nature of its content… how will you have time to keep up with all the breaking news on OAN. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I’m gonna warn you, due to its relative size the tech warrant community can be extremely clique’ish on gatekeeping upward mobility. The other bad trend we seem to have is a lot of WO positions in the MTOE exist at such a level you get bosses with rank that discount your expertise because you’re just a W2, or warrants that try to wear daddy’s rank which is no better than the out of control E8/9. I’m am glad to see the Air Force embrace the concept of specialization over ladder climbing and I do think it’s something we should get behind DOD wide. I just hope in growing this new community they can avoid the pitfalls and negative habits we created in the Army. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk