Clark Griswold

Do you mean the latest you and your phone, computer, post, whatever, etc... are open for scrutiny, search, investigation and you are responsible for every communication that can be judged with out cause ? From JQP: http://www.jqpublicblog.com/in-message-to-wing-commanders-welsh-declares-zero-privacy-doctrine-for-all-airmen/ This is Orwellian.

Done - read more on this and once again I ask how much further down the road to crazyville can the AF go? Thanks btw.

Yup - new PM does not favor 5th gen stealth for Canada http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canada-election-2015-trudeau-scrap-f35-halifax-1.3235791 From FoxtrotAlpha: http://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/big-liberal-win-in-canada-is-bad-news-for-the-f-35-join-1737515488

First time hearing of this bullshit - anyone at Laughlin have more to add? http://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/air-force-loses-its-mind-grounds-pilots-over-texting-m-1737596640

The F-35C is getting spiked. http://breakingdefense.com/2015/10/f-35c-a-wrong-turn-for-navy-cnas/ From the article: If the Navy cancelled F-35C altogether, Hendrix writes, “it could afford to purchase two squadrons of 12 Super Hornets [per carrier] (in addition to the two Super Hornet squadrons already present) to replace the two squadrons of 10 F-35Cs and purchase six squadrons of [drones] with 16 aircraft apiece (12 strikers and four tankers) and still be able to return money to the taxpayers.” I've always suspect the Navy was playing it cool to see if it could get out of the JSF business, this is just an article and an argument but it has some valid points, the moolah saving and still buying new Super-bugs might persuade Congress to change heading. Or we could do nothing and just keep driving towards the abyss...

Yep - they put em in shitholes with limited economies, the town becomes dependent and desperate to keep the base / mission and then the AF can leverage that to get a vote for something else - myopic and unconcerned about the second order effects of all that wheeling and dealing Edit for better thought rambling. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Ok I won't cast that curse but if it was Pensacola or San Antonio that'd be pretty good IMO Had not heard of the effort to put MCEs in decent locales but given that could raise morale you can be sure that is below the line unfortunately Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I wish that weren't true but damn it.... On spitball ideas, if we cared about the long term viability of the officers careers as pilots (and God forbid, morale) we would put MCEs at UPT bases, when the planes and RPA pilots could fit into the schedule for a CT sortie, go do it. But this is the SAPR-DTS-AAD required-Disco Belt modern day AF, hell bent on forgetting its heritage and reason for being a separate service...

Yep - not the whole bleak picture but probably a good guess at what the Battle of Taiwan would require... a shit load of airplanes, missiles, luck and brass balls to fight. Article on what a PRC invasion of Taiwan might look like or their options for a military solution to re-unification: http://www.businessinsider.com/what-a-chinese-invasion-of-taiwan-would-look-like-2014-6 Probably the best Taiwan can do it make the island one giant IED, machine gun and sniper's nest to make any amphibious or airborne invasion enormously costly to the invasion force, a pyrrhic victory at best via a very long bloody campaign. Article at TNR on that subject: http://nationalinterest.org/feature/taiwans-master-plan-defeat-china-war-12510 The best deterrent is the anticipated reaction of the world: Seizure of foreign investments and good luck getting paid on the 2+ trillion the US owes you, no one except the pariah states would recognize their annexation and everyone around you will now arm themselves to the max extent they can afford and probably cozy up with the US and maybe even Japan. Great you got an island with no natural resources, no one recognizes your claim, you fought a very bloody & expensive campaign and the population hates you - big win.

Same here but I think adding 50% + would be a reasonable WAG figuring the wagon train of logistics to put that JP8 over the AOR Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

MacGruber could figure this shit out But we're without him so mere mortals will have to do...there is no solution, just as I am starting to believe there is no Syria anymore, all the nations created by Sykes-Picot are failing apart, let it just partition and separate out...

Probably something like this: Proposed Safe Zone is getting circulated with about 0.69% of happening. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/us-said-it-will-create-a-safe-zone-on-syrian-border-but-nobody-knows-how/2015/08/12/4c7d0baa-37e4-11e5-ab7b-6416d97c73c2_story.html Just as soon as we commit to an open ended 100k boots on the ground, not holding breath...

No doubt that T-X is or will be on the back burner but I don't think there is really a choice, the Tones, 38s are at a point where they either need recapitalization or replacement and the future of the AF (unfortunately) will probably consist of fewer total number of cockpits and types of cockpits, "de-specialization" is better for this future AF and in reflection of my time in the AF and flying, specialization in UPT created yet another barrier / stovepiping in the AF, Kina touchy feely comment I realize but we bitch about the lack of a unifying experience or identity in the AF, there are no obvious practical solutions to this but in this corner of the AF that tends to produce the senior leaders, we can start them with a common experience to provide amongst this small but important population in the AF the common identity we strive for.

Pretty much spot on

ANG in Vietnam.

Yep but even where they live it is do as i say not as i do, behold liberal / progressive hypocrisy and NIMBYism at its worst: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/424550/in-brooklyn-public-schools-progressives-opposing-integration-reihan-salam

Yeah, but you there are fundamentals that are transferable also the experience is universal. Granted it's not that hard and it's not an absolute requirement (NVGs, SPINs, etc...) but I think it would enhance the product delivered to the Heavies, just an idea irrespective of money, planning or logistics so it'd be highly disruptive but that's how evolution happens sometimes. No argument on returning to a single Advanced Phase Trainer - got to see the T-50 and T-100 displays at AFA Convention this year - only VIPs got to see the Boeing presentation and Clark Griswold was not on that list. Awesome jets and a huge leap from where we are at now, once again if I were CSAF for a day we'd all track to the new Phase III trainer and incorporate IFF, NVGs, LL, etc into an extended syllabus... and based on that final score, dudes would be deemed Fighter qual'd and select whatever they wanted based on merit.

Sorry my privilege got in the way Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Because stealing your stuff is ok. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/10/08/black-lives-leader-defends-looting-in-yale-lecture/

Probably the best summary of what Russia is up to in one place: http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/09/30/world/middleeast/syria-control-map-isis-rebels-airstrikes.html

I agree with not shortening Phase III, I would actually add more time but only 6k an hour for the mighty 135? Seems low. Did some Google-Fu and there was no clear perfect answer but Wiki (which is always a trustworthy source /s) gives a figure in 2002 of 11k per hour, inflation would take that to about 15k per hour, seems more likely. In the AOR, who the hell knows what it is.

While not a lease offer, the idea of only buying a core capability as needed stinks ala the original Tanker Lease idea and that worked great for us... The Tone did a good job and I thought it was good training for a large multi-crew jet, you could go with a refurbishment or look for something totally new (like the Eclipse) but if I were CSAF for a day, I would want to expand the advanced phase for more training (NVGs, International, Intro to Tactics/SPINs) and allow the Tone (or whatever might replace it) studs to track bomber also. Expand the training and choices to the studs who track to the T-1, a more capable trainer is the first step.

RT has some more from the highlights reel: https://www.rt.com/news/317864-russian-warships-missiles-launch/ Time to one up our friends in Moscow... Arc Light II

Apparently so.

Call it Op Kitchen Sink. Stopping China Would Take 2/3 of U.S. Air Powerhttp://warisboring.com/articles/stopping-china-would-take-23-of-u-s-air-power/ Minor edit.