ClearedHot

Something tells me the fun police will find a way to lock them down so they only display charts.

Yet she has the lips to step up to the table and play the game... FWIW, I say let her play on.

Libyan Rebels Are Flying Their Own Minidrone

Ignorance can be fixed, stupid is forever.

Reading fail...scroll up read again and punch yourself in the nuts...

Police Stop Man Attempting to Ignite Fireworks From Jeep at National Mall The Jeep had also been fitted with a turret and multiple PVC tubes from which fireworks could be shot out of. PYB?

REALLY bad Weekend. Bryan Jensen was killed yesterday as well. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PAKJGzxm1-w

Maybe they were verboten in some obscure reg kept in a deep dark recess of USAF/HQ...and completely ignored by everyone including the CSAF. Now the Shoes have won another battle in the endless war of queep, soon, they will conquer us and all that is good. A Lt Col Afraid of a CMSgt...UFB!

Because things don't always work out like you think they will...kind of like when they designed the F-4 and did not put a gun on it because all future airwars were going to be BVR faceshots (sts).

I am a FGO...I don't have a braided belt, I wear blue jeans not dockers, and I never tuck in my polo shirt. Even if I did all of the above, nothing says heinous like a SNCO with his hair parted down the middle.

Fail... First rule of debrief, admit mistakes and learn from them. Quibbling or making excuses equals pay double.

No idea what this sentence means...also, no idea why you posted a picture of the A29 Super Tucano in a thread about the AT-6? Super-T AT-6

Nothing says fun like slinging 105MM hate at some soon to be red mist zombies. New mark is 1125. Going to be hard to beat that with the Civs running into the fray.

PCAS reaches first design review ...The programme will use an unmanned A-10 Thunderbolt II or ‘Warthog’ for the demonstration in 2015... ...It is understood that DARPA is considering four munitions including the JDAM, Laser Maverick, 2.75-in rocket and gun...

If the LGPOS could haul more than two bombs to the fight you might do better.

1016

Just ask your mom to show you her drivers license...son.

Completely true, it says NO POINTS on the ticket...ergo, no insurance premium increase. This is simply a battle against the man who is trying to collect revenue.

Agreed, but from what I hear, the court is not very tolerant of long-winded speeches about "confronting my accuser", "paying with pictures of money", or other "speed cameras are unconstitutional" declarations. The guy that recently won his case did so with math and was able to generate reasonable doubt. I really want help with the math and the formula...clearly the reflected signal would be large enough to encompass the other vehicle as close as it is. I just want to prove that.

No...local law and printed on the ticket, you are required to provide that information in the form of a notarized affidavit on the back of the ticket if you want to claim you were not driving.

You are required to provide the name, current address, and driver's license number of the person that was driving.

Normally I would agree but there is a big story on the local news about a local man who used data to prove the speed cameras just across the river are not working properly. In short, the cameras in Maryland take two pictures, he was able to overlay the pictures and show the speed calibration was incorrect. He already won three cases and has another 40 tickets he is contesting. I checked and the DC cameras record two pictures, but one is just a close up of the license plate and cannot be used as an overlay as outlined above. I appreciate the "check the certification" suggestions, but I would rather beat them with facts and math. I just have yet to find the formula to prove what I think is true. One thing at a time.

Great idea, but no beer for you...

The link works for me, goes directly to the PDF and downloads a 24 slide presentation.